Routine practice group
Diagnostic TestRoutine practice group
NCT Number: NCT05758402
This was a randomized, open, parallel, controlled, multi-center, interventional, cross-sectional study to evaluate the detection rate of Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in Korean moderate to severe Psoriasis (PsO) patients with or without the Early arthritis for psoriatic patients (EARP) screening.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–100 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Novartis Investigative Site, Bundang Gu, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
All procedures for each patient were performed for one day. If an additional time was required depending on the circumstances of the institution and so on, the data specified in this study protocol were recommended to be collected as soon as possible. After the participants enrolled in this study, they were assessed whether they met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. In terms of the severity of PsO, it was assessed with the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and if the score of 10 or higher was defined as moderate to severe PsO. A total 368 eligible participants were randomized 1:1 ratio into the EARP group and the Routine practice group.
For the EARP group, the investigator asked the participants about the EARP questionnaire consisting of 10 questions. When the EARP score >= 3, the participants were suspected for having potential PsA. For Routine practice group, the investigator selected the participants suspected of PsA in consideration of the various clinical characteristics of the participants.
After the completion of EARP questionnaire evaluation and the investigator's judgement as per routine practice in each group, all the participants were evaluated using Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis (CASPAR). According to the CASPAR, participants having inflammatory articular disease with 3 or more points from the CASPAR were diagnosed as PsA, and the detection rate of PsA in each group was evaluated and compared.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Routine practice group
EARP group
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1)
After the completion of EARP questionnaire evaluation and the investigator's judgement as per routine practice in each group, all the participants were evaluated using Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis (CASPAR). According to the CASPAR, participants having inflammatory articular disease with 3 or more points from the CASPAR were diagnosed as PsA, and the detection rate of PsA in each group was evaluated and compared.
The detection rate of Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) amongst moderate to severe Psoriasis (PsO) patients between the EARP group and the Routine practice groups was defined as the percentage of patients with true positive results divided by all patients in each EARP and Routine practice group.
The true positive results were defined as patients with a classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis (CASPAR) score >= 3 among EARP >= 3 for the EARP group and among those suspected of PsA by investigator's judgement for the Routine Practice group.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1)
Sensitivity was summarized with the number and percentage of patients who have true positive (TP) among those who have true positive (TP) and false negative (FN).
Specificity was summarized with the number and percentage of patients who have true negative (TN) among those who have true negative (TN) and false positive (FP).
Positive predictive value (PPV) was summarized with the number and percentage of patients who have true positive (TP) among those who have true positive (TP) and false positive (FP).
Negative predictive value (NPV) was summarized with the number and percentage of patients who have true negative (TN) among those who have true negative (TN) and false negative (FN).
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1)
Age characteristics between patients with PsA and without PsA were analyzed and compared.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1)
Gender characteristics between patients with PsA and without PsA were analyzed and compared.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1)
Body Mass Index (BMI) characteristics between patients with PsA and without PsA were analyzed and compared.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1)
Drinking and smoking history characteristics between patients with PsA and without PsA were analyzed and compared.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1)
Duration of Psoriasis (PsO) characteristics between patients with PsA and without PsA were analyzed and compared.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1)
Family history of psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) characteristics between patients with PsA and without PsA were analyzed and compared.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1)
PASI combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score in the range 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). The body is divided into four sections (head (H) (10% of a person's skin); arms (A) (20%); trunk (T) (30%); legs (L) (40%)). Each of these areas is scored by itself, and then the four scores are combined into the final PASI. For each section, the percent of area of skin involved, is estimated and then transformed into a grade from 0 (0% of involved area) to 6 (90-100% of involved area). Within each area, the severity is estimated by three clinical signs: erythema (redness), induration (thickness) and desquamation (scaling). Severity parameters are measured on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). The sum of all three severity parameters is then calculated for each section of skin, multiplied by the area score for that area and multiplied by weight of respective section (0.1 for head, 0.2 for arms, 0.3 for body and 0.4 for legs).
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1)
The presence or absence of hard-to-treat area involvement (scalp, palmoplantar, nails) and presence or absence of musculoskeletal symptoms between patients with PsA and without PsA were analyzed and compared.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1)
The Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score is used to measure psoriasis of the nails. Each nail is divided into 4 equal and symmetrical quadrants to properly assess nail matrix and nail bed changes. Each nail is given a score for nail bed PsO and nail matrix PsO ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (present in 4/4 nail) depending on the presence of any of the features of nail PsO in that quadrant. A total score per nail is 0-8, and the range of the total scores from all nails is 0-160 (toenails are included).
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1)
66 swollen and 68 tender joints are assessed (the hips are not assessed for swelling). The joint count is scored as a sum of the tender joints and a sum of the swollen joints. SJC66: swollen joint count in 66 joints; TJC68: tender joint count in 66 joints.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1)
The presence or absence of co-morbidities (heart diseases, stroke, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension and fatty liver)) between patients with PsA and without PsA were analyzed and compared.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1)
The presence or absence of PsO related treatment other than medications (UV light therapy, Psoralen with ultraviolet A (PUVA), Phototherapy and Laser therapy and Naturopathy) between patients with PsA and without PsA was analyzed and compared.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Industry
Acronym: ASAP
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04433442
Arthritis, Arthritis, Psoriatic
Busan, Busan Gwang Yeogsi, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT05590247
Arthritis, Arthritis, Psoriatic
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03737045
Arthritis, Arthritis, Psoriatic
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06101706
Arthritis, Arthritis, Psoriatic
Avignon, France
View Trial Details