Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Terminated

NCT Number: NCT05516498

Zibotentan and Dapagliflozin Combination, EvAluated in Liver Cirrhosis (ZEAL Study)

This is a two part Phase IIa/b multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group dose-ranging study to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the combination of zibotentan and dapagliflozin, and dapagliflozin monotherapy versus placebo in participants with cirrhosis with features of portal hypertension.

Why the study stopped: The study was ended earlier than planned due to a sponsor decision.
Terminated

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Research Site, Heidelberg, Australia

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Part A will assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the combination of B mg zibotentan and 10 mg dapagliflozin versus placebo in participants with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis with features of portal hypertension and with no history of decompensation events.

If the safety profile is determined to be acceptable at the conclusion of Part A, Part B will investigate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of A mg, B mg, or C mg zibotentan combined with 10 mg dapagliflozin and of 10 mg dapagliflozin monotherapy versus placebo in participants with cirrhosis with features of portal hypertension. Part B will include a broader range of Child- Pugh A and Child-Pugh B cirrhosis participants, including those with more severe disease, a history of decompensation events, or current ascites.

The study will be conducted in approximately 30 to 45 study centres in North America, Asia, and Europe.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Study principal inclusion criteria For both Part A and Part B

  • No current or prior (within 1 month of enrolment) medical treatment with an SGLT2 inhibitor or ERAs.
  • On no or a stable dose of beta blockers, with no major dose changes within 1 month prior to the first dose of study intervention.
  • Provision of signed and dated, written ICF prior to any mandatory study-specific procedures, sampling, and analyses.
  • Female participants of non-childbearing potential confirmed at screening by fulfilling one of the following criteria:
  • Post-menopausal: defined as amenorrhoea for at least 12 months or more following cessation of all exogenous hormonal treatments; and also, FSH levels in the post-menopausal range by central laboratory.
  • Documentation of irreversible surgical sterilisation by hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy or bilateral salpingectomy but not tubal ligation.
  • Female participants must have a negative pregnancy test at screening and must not be lactating

Part A participants who have the following:

  • Clinical and/or histological diagnosis of cirrhosis with either (i) features of portal hypertension or (ii) liver stiffness ≥ 21 kPa.
  • MELD score < 15.
  • Child-Pugh score ≤ 6.
  • No clinically evident ascites.
  • No evidence of worsening of hepatic function (eg, no clinically significant change in signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters of hepatic disease status) within the last month prior to dosing, as determined by the investigator or usual practitioner.
  • HVPG recording of good enough quality as judged by a central reader.

Part B participants who have the following:

  • Clinical and/or histological diagnosis of cirrhosis and either history of decompensation or compensated cirrhosis with signs of clinically significant portal hypertension.
  • HVPG recording of good enough quality and HVPG > 10 mmHg, as judged by a central reader.
  • MELD score < 15.
  • Child-Pugh score < 10.
  • No ascites or ascites up to grade 2 without change in diuretic treatment within the last month prior to first dose and no paracentesis within the last month or planned paracentesis in the next 4 months at screening.
  • No evidence of worsening of hepatic function (eg, no clinically significant change in signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters of hepatic disease status) within the last month prior to dosing, as determined by the investigator or usual practitioner.

Study principal exclusion criteria:

  • Any evidence of a clinically significant disease which in the investigator's opinion makes it undesirable for the participant to participate in the study.
  • Liver cirrhosis caused by chronic cholestatic liver disease
  • ALT or AST ≥ 150 U/L and/or total bilirubin ≥ 3 × ULN
  • Acute liver injury caused by drug toxicity or by an infection.
  • Any history of hepatocellular carcinoma.
  • Liver transplant or expected liver transplantation within 6 months of screening.
  • History of TIPS or a planned TIPS within 6 months from enrolment into the study.
  • Active treatment for HCV within the last 1 year or HBV antiviral therapy for less than 1 year.
  • Participants with T1DM.

Medical Conditions (Part A only)

  • INR > 1.5.
  • Serum/plasma levels of albumin ≤ 35 g/L.
  • Platelet count < 75 × 109/L.
  • History of ascites
  • History of hepatic hydrothorax
  • History of portopulmonary syndrome
  • History of hepatic encephalopathy
  • History of variceal haemorrhage
  • History of acute kidney injury
  • History of heart failure, including high output heart failure (eg, due to hyperthyroidism or Paget's disease)

Medical Conditions (Part B only)

  • INR > 1.7.
  • Serum/plasma levels of albumin ≤ 28 g/L.
  • Platelet count < 50 × /109L.
  • Acute kidney injury within 3 months of screening.
  • History of encephalopathy of West Haven grade 2 or higher within 6 months prior to screening.
  • History of variceal haemorrhage within 6 months prior to screening.
  • NYHA functional heart failure class III or IV or with unstable heart failure requiring hospitalisation for optimisation of heart failure treatment and who are not yet stable on heart failure therapy within 6 months prior to screening.
  • Heart failure due to cardiomyopathies that would primarily require specific other treatment: eg, cardiomyopathy due to pericardial disease, amyloidosis or other infiltrative diseases, cardiomyopathy related to congenital heart disease, primary hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, cardiomyopathy related to toxic or infective conditions (ie, chemotherapy, infective myocarditis, septic cardiomyopathy).
  • High output heart failure (eg, due to hyperthyroidism or Paget's disease).
  • Heart failure due to primary cardiac valvular disease/dysfunction, severe functional mitral or tricuspid valve insufficiency, or planned cardiac valve repair/replacement.

Treatment and study plan

Part A: Placebo (matching zibotentan capsule & matching dapagliflozin tablet)

Drug

placebo capsule (matching zibotentan capsule)

placebo tablet (matching dapagliflozin tablet)

Part A: zibotentan (dose B) + dapagliflozin

Drug

zibotentan capsule

dapagliflozin tablet

Part B: Placebo (matching zibotentan capsule & matching dapagliflozin tablet)

Drug

placebo capsule (matching zibotentan capsule)

placebo tablet (matching dapagliflozin tablet)

Part B: placebo (matching zibotentan capsule) + dapagliflozin

Drug

placebo capsule (matching zibotentan capsule)

dapagliflozin tablet

Part B: zibotentan (dose A) + dapagliflozin

Drug

zibotentan capsule

dapagliflozin tablet

Part B: zibotentan (dose B) + dapagliflozin

Drug

zibotentan capsule

dapagliflozin tablet

Part B: zibotentan (dose C) + dapagliflozin

Drug

zibotentan capsule

dapagliflozin tablet

Primary outcomes

  1. Absolute Change in HVPG From Baseline to Week 6, Part A

    Time frame: From Baseline to Week 6

    Absolute change in Hepatic venous pressure gradient from baseline to week 6.

  2. Absolute Change in HVPG From Baseline to Week 6, Part B

    Time frame: From Baseline to Week 6

    Absolute change in Hepatic venous pressure gradient from baseline to week 6.

Secondary outcomes

  1. HVPG Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 6, Part A

    Time frame: From Baseline to Week 6

    Hepatic venous pressure gradient percentage change from baseline to week 6, Part A.

  2. HVPG Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 6, Part B

    Time frame: From baseline to week 6

    Hepatic venous pressure gradient percentage change from baseline to week 6, Part B.

  3. Number of Participants With HVPG Response at Week 6, Part A

    Time frame: From baseline to week 6

    A HVPG responder is defined as a subject having <10 mmHg at week 6 if baseline HVPG >=10 or a reduction of >=1.5 mmHg from baseline to week 6. n: Number of subjects in analysis. N: Number of subjects per treatment group.

  4. Number of Participants With HVPG Response at Week 6, Part B

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 6

    A HVPG responder in Part B is defined as a subject having at least 20% decrease or a reduction to or below 12 mmHg if baseline HVPG > 12 mmHG from baseline to Week 6.

  5. Change in Body Weight (kg) Over Time Course of Study, Part A

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 6

    The analysis is performed using MMRM. The model includes the continuous covariate of the Baseline measurements as the fixed effect covariate and fixed categorical effects of treatment group, visit, and treatmentby-visit interaction.

  6. Change in Body Weight (kg) Over Time Course of Study, Part B

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 6 and Week 16

    The analysis is performed using MMRM. The model includes the continuous covariate of the Baseline measurements as the fixed effect covariate and fixed categorical effects of treatment group, visit, and treatmentby-visit interaction.

  7. Change in Total Dosage of Loop-diuretic Equivalents Use From Baseline to Week 6, Part A

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 6

    Change in total dosage of loop-diuretic equivalents use from baseline to Week 6, Part A. A loop-diuretic equivalent is based on 40 mg furosemide = 1 mg bumetanide = 20 mg torsemide = 50 mg ethacrynic acid.

  8. Change in Total Dosage of Loop-diuretic Equivalents Use From Baseline to Week 6 and Week 16, Part B

    Time frame: From Baseline to Week 6 and Week 16

    Change in total dosage of loop-diuretic equivalents use from baseline to Week 6, Part B. A loop-diuretic equivalent is based on 40 mg furosemide = 1 mg bumetanide = 20 mg torsemide = 50 mg ethacrynic acid.

  9. Change in Total Body Water From Baseline to Week 6, Part A

    Time frame: From Baseline to Week 6

    Change in total body water from baseline to Week 6, Part A. The analysis is performed using MMRM.

  10. Change in Total Body Water From Baseline to Week 6 and Week 16, Part B

    Time frame: From Baseline to Week 6 and Week 16

    Change in total body water from baseline to Week 6 and Week 16, Part B. The analysis is performed using MMRM.

  11. Change in Extracellular Water From Baseline to Week 6, Part A

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 6

    Change in extracellular water from baseline to Week 6, Part A. The analysis is performed using MMRM. Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) was performed at the study centre to monitor body water volumes and body fat mass.

  12. Change in Extracellular Water From Baseline to Week 6 and Week 16, Part B

    Time frame: From Baseline to Week 6 and to Week 16

    Change in extracellular water from baseline to Week 6 and Week 16, Part B. The analysis is performed using MMRM. Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) was performed at the study centre to monitor body water volumes and body fat mass.

  13. Change in Intracellular Water From Baseline to Week 6, Part A

    Time frame: From Baseline to Week 6

    Change in intracellular water from Baseline to Week 6, Part A. The analysis is performed using MMRM. Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) was performed at the study centre to monitor body water volumes and body fat mass.

  14. Change in Intracellular Water From Baseline to Week 6 and Week 16, Part B

    Time frame: From Baseline to Week 6 and Week 16

    Change in intracellular water from Baseline to Week 6 and Week 16, Part B. The analysis is performed using MMRM. Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) was performed at the study centre to monitor body water volumes and body fat mass.

  15. Change in Total Body Fat Mass From Baseline to Week 6, Part A

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 6

    Change in total body fat mass from Baseline to Week 6, Part A. The analysis is performed using MMRM. Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) was performed at the study centre to monitor body water volumes and body fat mass.

  16. Change in Total Body Fat Mass From Baseline to Week 6 and Week 16, Part B

    Time frame: From Baseline to Week 6 and Week 16

    Change in total body fat mass from Baseline to Week 6 and Week 16, Part B. The analysis is performed using MMRM. Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) was performed at the study centre to monitor body water volumes and body fat mass.

  17. Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 6, Part A

    Time frame: From Baseline to Week 6

    Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to Week 6, Part A. The analysis is performed using MMRM.

  18. Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 6 and Week 16, Part B

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 6 and Week 16

    Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to Week 6 and Week 16, Part B. The analysis is performed using MMRM.

  19. Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 6, Part A

    Time frame: From Baseline to Week 6

    Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to Week 6, Part A. The analysis is performed using MMRM.

  20. Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 6 and Week 16, Part B

    Time frame: From baseline to Week 6 and Week 16

    Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to Week 6 and Week 16, Part B. The analysis is performed using MMRM.

Interested in participating?

Terminated

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

AstraZeneca

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Two Part Phase IIa/b Multicentre, Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Dose-ranging Study to Assess Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of the Combination of Zibotentan and Dapagliflozin, and Dapagliflozin Monotherapy Versus Placebo in Participants With Cirrhosis With Features of Portal Hypertension

Acronym: ZEAL

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Aug 25, 2022
Registry last updated
Sep 25, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.