Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, not recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05471843

Study of Sonrotoclax (BGB-11417) Monotherapy in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma

The study consists of two parts. Part 1 determines the safety and tolerability of sonrotoclax monotherapy, the maximum tolerated dose, and the recommended Phase 2 dose of sonrotoclax monotherapy for relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma. Part 2 evaluates efficacy of sonrotoclax monotherapy at the recommended Phase 2 dose with recommended ramp-up schedule from Part 1.

Active, not recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 1 / Phase 2

Primary location

Hospital Aleman, Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Argentina

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically confirmed diagnosis of MCL
  • Prior systemic treatments for MCL (at least one line of anti-cluster of differentiation 20 (anti-CD20) based immune or chemoimmunotherapy and at least one kind of covalent or non-covalent adequate Bruton Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) inhibitor).
  • Relapsed/refractory disease
  • Presence of measurable disease
  • Availability of archival tissue confirming diagnosis of MCL, or willing to undergo fresh tumor biopsy
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0,1 or 2.
  • Adequate organ function

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known central nervous system involvement by lymphoma
  • Prior malignancy other than MCL within the past 3 years, except for curatively treated basal or squamous cell skin cancer, superficial bladder cancer, carcinoma in situ of the cervix or breast, or localized Gleason score 6 prostate cancer.
  • Prior exposure to a BCL-2 inhibitor (eg, venetoclax/ABT-199).
  • Prior autologous stem cell transplant within the last 3 months; or prior autologous chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy within the last 3 months; or prior allogeneic stem cell transplant within the last 6 months or currently has an active graft-vs-host disease requiring the use of immunosuppressants.
  • Clinically significant cardiovascular disease.
  • Major surgery or significant injury ≤ 4 weeks prior to start of study treatment.
  • Active fungal, bacterial or viral infection requiring systemic treatment.

Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

Treatment and study plan

Sonrotoclax

Drug

Administered orally

Other names: BGB-11417

Primary outcomes

  1. Part 1: Number of Participants Experiencing Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

    Time frame: From first dose in the ramp-up period through the first 3 weeks of treatment at the target dose (approximately 7 weeks)

    DLTs included the following events without a clear alternative cause other than study drug:

    Hematologic Toxicity:

    • Grade ≥ 3 febrile neutropenia;
    • Grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia lasting > 7 days or resulting in clinically significant bleeding;
    • Any Grade ≥ 4 hematological toxicities, except for Grade 4 neutropenia lasting ≤ 7 days with or without treatment, Grade 4 lymphopenia, or Grade 4 leukopenia.

    Nonhematologic Toxicity:

    • Any Grade ≥ 3 nonhematologic toxicity with the following exceptions:
    • Laboratory tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) defined by the Howard criteria that resolves (≤ Grade 1 or baseline) in ≤ 3 days;
    • Individual TLS-related laboratory adverse events that resolve (≤ Grade 1or baseline) in ≤ 3 days with or without treatment;
    • Grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity that resolves to ≤ Grade 2 following therapeutic intervention in ≤ 7 days;
    • Asymptomatic biochemical laboratory abnormalities that resolve (≤ Grade 1 or baseline) in ≤ 7 days with or without supportive care.
  2. Part 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Adverse Events Leading to Treatment Discontinuation

    Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose or the primary analysis data cut-off date, whichever occurred earlier; maximum duration of treatment was 31 months.

    An adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study drug, whether considered related to study drug or not.

    A serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose:

    • Resulted in death
    • Was life-threatening
    • Required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization.
    • Resulted in disability/incapacity.
    • Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
    • Was considered a significant medical adverse event by the investigator or sponsor based on medical judgment.
  3. Part 1: Number of Participants Experiencing Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS) Adverse Events

    Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose or the primary analysis data cut-off date, whichever occurred earlier; maximum duration of treatment was 31 months.

    Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) occurs when large numbers of cancer cells die rapidly, releasing their contents (such as potassium, phosphorus, and nucleic acids) into the bloodstream faster than the kidneys can filter them out. This rapid breakdown causes a dangerous chain reaction of metabolic and electrolyte imbalances.

  4. Part 2: Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)

    Time frame: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.

    ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per the Lugano Classification for non-Hodgin lymphoma.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) of Sonrotoclax After a Single Dose

    Time frame: Ramp-up Week 1 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose

  2. Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) of Sonrotoclax at Steady-State

    Time frame: Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose

  3. Part 1: Time to Maximum Observed Concentration of Sonrotoclax (Tmax) After a Single Dose

    Time frame: Ramp-up Week 1 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose

  4. Part 1: Time to Maximum Observed Concentration of Sonrotoclax (Tmax) at Steady State

    Time frame: Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose

  5. Part 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Sonrotoclax After a Single Dose

    Time frame: Ramp-up Week 1 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose

  6. Part 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) at Steady State

    Time frame: Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose

  7. Part 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) at Steady State

    Time frame: Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose

  8. Part 1: Overall Response Rate Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)

    Time frame: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.

    ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a complete response (CR), or partial response (PR) per the Lugano classification for non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

    IRC review for response assessments was only performed for Part 1 participants assigned to the 320 mg dose level.

  9. Part 1: Overall Response Rate Assessed by the Investigator

    Time frame: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.

    ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a complete response (CR), or partial response (PR) per Lugano classification for non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

  10. Part 1: Duration of Response (DOR) Assessed by the IRC

    Time frame: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.

    DOR is defined as the time from the date of the first documented response (PR or better) after treatment initiation until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause; whichever occurred first, per the Lugano classification for non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

    IRC review for response assessments was only performed for Part 1 participants assigned to the 320 mg dose level.

    DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

  11. Part 1: Duration of Response Assessed by the Investigator

    Time frame: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.

    DOR is defined as the time from the date of the first documented response (PR or better) after treatment initiation until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

  12. Part 1: Progression Free Survival (PFS) Assessed by the IRC

    Time frame: From first dose until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.

    PFS is defined as the time from the date of the first study dose until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.

    IRC review for response assessments was only performed for Part 1 participants assigned to the 320 mg dose level.

    PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

  13. Part 1: Progression-free Survival Assessed by the Investigator

    Time frame: From first dose until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.

    PFS is defined as the time from the date of the first study dose until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

  14. Part 1: Time to Response (TTR) as Assessed by the IRC

    Time frame: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.

    Time to response is defined as the time from start of treatment to first documentation of response (PR or better). IRC review for response assessments was only performed for Part 1 participants assigned to the 320 mg dose level.

  15. Part 1: Time to Response Assessed by the Investigator

    Time frame: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.

    TTR is defined as the time from start of treatment to first documentation of response (PR or better).

  16. Part 1: Overall Survival (OS)

    Time frame: From first dose until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.

    Overall survival is defined as the time from the start of treatment to the date of death due to any cause. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

  17. Part 2: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Assessed by the Investigator

    Time frame: Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.

    ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per the Lugano Classification for non-Hodgin lymphoma.

  18. Part 2: Duration of Response Assessed by the IRC

    Time frame: Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.

    Duration of response is defined as the time from the date of the first documented response (PR or better) after treatment initiation until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

  19. Part 2: Duration of Response Assessed by the Investigator

    Time frame: Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.

    Duration of response is defined as the time from the date of the first documented response (PR or better) after treatment initiation until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

  20. Part 2: Progression-free Survival Assessed by the IRC

    Time frame: From first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.

    PFS is defined as the time from the date of the first study dose until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

  21. Part 2: Progression-free Survival Assessed by the Investigator

    Time frame: From first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.

    PFS is defined as the time from the date of the first study dose until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

  22. Part 2: Time to Response Assessed by the IRC

    Time frame: Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.

    Time to response is defined as the time from start of treatment to first documentation of response (PR or better).

  23. Part 2: Time to Response Assessed by the Investigator

    Time frame: Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.

    Time to response is defined as the time from start of treatment to first documentation of response (PR or better).

  24. Part 2: Overall Survival

    Time frame: From first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.

    Overall survival is defined as the time from the start of treatment to the date of death due to any cause. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

  25. Part 2: Change From Baseline in National Comprehensive Cancer Network - Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Symptom Index-18 (NFlymSI-18) Disease Related Symptoms-Physical (DRS-P) Sub-scale Score

    Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, and 24

    The NFlymSI-18 is a patient-reported outcome questionnaire that was developed to measure disease-specific symptoms and/or treatment-related concerns in patients with advanced lymphoma. The NFLymSI-18 questionnaire includes 18 separate questions about disease symptoms in the last 7 days; participants are asked to respond to each question on a scale from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The 18 questions are grouped into 4 subscale scores: "Disease related symptoms - physical," "Disease related symptoms - emotional," "Treatment side effects," and "Function and wellbeing." The Disease Related Symptoms - Physical subscale score ranges from 0 to 36, where higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

  26. Part 2: Change From Baseline in National Comprehensive Cancer Network - Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Symptom Index-18 (NFlymSI-18) Treatment Side-Effects (TSE) Sub-scale Score

    Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, and 24

    The NFlymSI-18 is a patient-reported outcome questionnaire that was developed to measure disease-specific symptoms and/or treatment-related concerns in patients with advanced lymphoma. The NFLymSI-18 questionnaire includes 18 separate questions about disease symptoms in the last 7 days; participants are asked to respond to each question on a scale from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The 18 questions are grouped into 4 subscale scores: "Disease related symptoms - physical," "Disease related symptoms - emotional," "Treatment side effects," and "Function and wellbeing." The Treatment Side-Effects subscale score ranges from 0 to 12, where higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

  27. Part 2: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score

    Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, and 24

    The EQ-5D VAS measures participants' self-rated health status on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 = 'the best health you can imagine' and 0 = 'the worst health you can imagine'. Higher scores on VAS indicate higher health status.

  28. Part 2: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Adverse Events Leading to Treatment Discontinuation

    Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose or the data cut-off date, whichever occurred earlier; maximum duration of treatment in Part 2 was 24.8 months.

    An adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study drug, whether considered related to study drug or not.

    A serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose:

    • Resulted in death
    • Was life-threatening
    • Required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization.
    • Resulted in disability/incapacity.
    • Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
    • Was considered a significant medical adverse event by the investigator or sponsor based on medical judgment.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

BeOne Medicines

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Multicenter Phase 1/2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of BCL2 Inhibitor BGB-11417 in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2027
First posted
Jul 25, 2022
Registry last updated
Sep 22, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.