Sonrotoclax
DrugAdministered orally
Other names: BGB-11417
NCT Number: NCT05471843
The study consists of two parts. Part 1 determines the safety and tolerability of sonrotoclax monotherapy, the maximum tolerated dose, and the recommended Phase 2 dose of sonrotoclax monotherapy for relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma. Part 2 evaluates efficacy of sonrotoclax monotherapy at the recommended Phase 2 dose with recommended ramp-up schedule from Part 1.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Hospital Aleman, Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Argentina
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Key Inclusion Criteria:
Key Exclusion Criteria:
Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.
Administered orally
Other names: BGB-11417
Time frame: From first dose in the ramp-up period through the first 3 weeks of treatment at the target dose (approximately 7 weeks)
DLTs included the following events without a clear alternative cause other than study drug:
Hematologic Toxicity:
Nonhematologic Toxicity:
Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose or the primary analysis data cut-off date, whichever occurred earlier; maximum duration of treatment was 31 months.
An adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study drug, whether considered related to study drug or not.
A serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose:
Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose or the primary analysis data cut-off date, whichever occurred earlier; maximum duration of treatment was 31 months.
Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) occurs when large numbers of cancer cells die rapidly, releasing their contents (such as potassium, phosphorus, and nucleic acids) into the bloodstream faster than the kidneys can filter them out. This rapid breakdown causes a dangerous chain reaction of metabolic and electrolyte imbalances.
Time frame: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per the Lugano Classification for non-Hodgin lymphoma.
Time frame: Ramp-up Week 1 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
Time frame: Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
Time frame: Ramp-up Week 1 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
Time frame: Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
Time frame: Ramp-up Week 1 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
Time frame: Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose
Time frame: Target Dose Week 4 Day 1 at predose
Time frame: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a complete response (CR), or partial response (PR) per the Lugano classification for non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
IRC review for response assessments was only performed for Part 1 participants assigned to the 320 mg dose level.
Time frame: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a complete response (CR), or partial response (PR) per Lugano classification for non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Time frame: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
DOR is defined as the time from the date of the first documented response (PR or better) after treatment initiation until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause; whichever occurred first, per the Lugano classification for non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
IRC review for response assessments was only performed for Part 1 participants assigned to the 320 mg dose level.
DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
DOR is defined as the time from the date of the first documented response (PR or better) after treatment initiation until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From first dose until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
PFS is defined as the time from the date of the first study dose until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.
IRC review for response assessments was only performed for Part 1 participants assigned to the 320 mg dose level.
PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From first dose until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
PFS is defined as the time from the date of the first study dose until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
Time to response is defined as the time from start of treatment to first documentation of response (PR or better). IRC review for response assessments was only performed for Part 1 participants assigned to the 320 mg dose level.
Time frame: Response was assessed 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to one year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
TTR is defined as the time from start of treatment to first documentation of response (PR or better).
Time frame: From first dose until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 1 was 10.7 (0.1-31.6) months.
Overall survival is defined as the time from the start of treatment to the date of death due to any cause. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per the Lugano Classification for non-Hodgin lymphoma.
Time frame: Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
Duration of response is defined as the time from the date of the first documented response (PR or better) after treatment initiation until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
Duration of response is defined as the time from the date of the first documented response (PR or better) after treatment initiation until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
PFS is defined as the time from the date of the first study dose until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
PFS is defined as the time from the date of the first study dose until the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
Time to response is defined as the time from start of treatment to first documentation of response (PR or better).
Time frame: Response was assessed at 8 and 16 weeks after the first dose, then every 12 weeks up to 1 year, every 24 weeks for 2 years, and yearly thereafter; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
Time to response is defined as the time from start of treatment to first documentation of response (PR or better).
Time frame: From first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date; median (range) time on follow-up in efficacy-evaluable participants in Part 2 was 14.2 (0.3-24.9) months.
Overall survival is defined as the time from the start of treatment to the date of death due to any cause. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, and 24
The NFlymSI-18 is a patient-reported outcome questionnaire that was developed to measure disease-specific symptoms and/or treatment-related concerns in patients with advanced lymphoma. The NFLymSI-18 questionnaire includes 18 separate questions about disease symptoms in the last 7 days; participants are asked to respond to each question on a scale from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The 18 questions are grouped into 4 subscale scores: "Disease related symptoms - physical," "Disease related symptoms - emotional," "Treatment side effects," and "Function and wellbeing." The Disease Related Symptoms - Physical subscale score ranges from 0 to 36, where higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, and 24
The NFlymSI-18 is a patient-reported outcome questionnaire that was developed to measure disease-specific symptoms and/or treatment-related concerns in patients with advanced lymphoma. The NFLymSI-18 questionnaire includes 18 separate questions about disease symptoms in the last 7 days; participants are asked to respond to each question on a scale from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The 18 questions are grouped into 4 subscale scores: "Disease related symptoms - physical," "Disease related symptoms - emotional," "Treatment side effects," and "Function and wellbeing." The Treatment Side-Effects subscale score ranges from 0 to 12, where higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, and 24
The EQ-5D VAS measures participants' self-rated health status on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 = 'the best health you can imagine' and 0 = 'the worst health you can imagine'. Higher scores on VAS indicate higher health status.
Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose or the data cut-off date, whichever occurred earlier; maximum duration of treatment in Part 2 was 24.8 months.
An adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study drug, whether considered related to study drug or not.
A serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose:
BeOne Medicines
Industry
A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Multicenter Phase 1/2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of BCL2 Inhibitor BGB-11417 in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05495464
Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases, Immune System Diseases
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03162536
Blood Protein Disorders, Cardiovascular Diseases
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01415752
Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases, Immune System Diseases
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02952508
Blood Protein Disorders, Cardiovascular Diseases
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial Details