Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05421273

Effects of Active Versus Passive Recharge Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation on Pain Experience in Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type 2: a Multicenter Randomized Trial (BURST-RAP Study)

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has shown to be an effective treatment for patients with persistent spinal pain syndrome Type 2 (PSPS Type 2). The method used to deliver electrical charge in SCS is important. One such method is burst stimulation. Two variations of burst waveforms are currently in use: one that employs active recharge and one that uses passive recharge. It is still unknown if there are clinical differences between active recharge and passive recharge burst SCS. To date, no clinical studies have been performed that directly compared these two burst stimulation waveforms. The objective of this Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) is to assess and compare effect of passive recharge burst SCS with active recharge burst SCS on pain relief and motivational-emotional facets of pain

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, Gelderland, Netherlands

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This multicenter randomized clinical trial will take place in 6 Dutch hospitals: the Rijnstate Hospital (Arnhem), Bravis Hospital (Roosendaal), Elizabeth TweeSteden Hospital (Tilburg), Diakonessen Hospital (Utrecht), Alrijne Hospital (Leiden) and the Amsterdam University Medical Hospitals A-UMC). PSPS Type II2 patients (n=96) will be randomized into a group receiving either active or passive recharge burst. Following a successful trial period, patients are permanently implanted. Patients complete the pain catastrophizing score (PCS) (primary outcome at 6 months), numeric pain rating scale (NRS), patient vigilance and awareness questionnaire (PVAQ), hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS), quality of life (EQ-5D), Oswestery disability index (ODI), patient global impression of change (PGIC) and painDETECT questionnaires (secondary outcomes) at baseline, after trial, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months following implantation.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects between 18 and 70 years of age
  • At least moderate level of catastrophizing as measured with the Pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) of at least 20 at first visit of the pain clinic.
  • Chronic pain diagnoses as PSPS Type 2 of at least 6 months
  • Neurologic exam without marked motor deficit.
  • LBP and/or leg pain intensity should be 5 or higher measured with the 11-box NRS 0-10
  • Meets all the inclusion criteria for the implantation of a neurostimulation system as typically utilized in the study center. PM: depression is not an exclusion criteria
  • Subject has been screened by a multi-disciplinary panel including a psychologist and deemed suitable for implantation
  • Subject is able and willing to comply with the follow-up schedule and protocol
  • Subject is able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Female subject of childbearing potential is pregnant/nursing or plans to become pregnant during the course of the study
  • Escalating or changing pain condition within the past month as evidenced by investigator examination
  • BMI ≥35
  • "Subject has had injection therapy or radiofrequency treatment for their low back pain (LBP) or leg pain within the past 3 months"
  • Subject currently has an active implantable device including ICD, pacemaker, spinal cord stimulator or intrathecal drug pump
  • Subject is unable to operate the device
  • Severe spinal column degeneration likely to cause technical problems with neuromodulation, to be assessed by the treating physician
  • Previous Neurostimulation therapy

Treatment and study plan

Spinal cord stimulation using passive recharge burst stimulation

Device

Passive recharge burst is marked by a recharge pattern that passively compensates for charge differences.

Spinal cord stimulation using active recharge burst stimulation

Device

Active recharge burst is characterized by negative pulses that directly compensate for charge differences.

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain catastrophizing score

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Numeric pain rating scale

    Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months

  2. Patient vigilance and awareness questionnaire

    Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months

  3. Hospital anxiety and depression scale

    Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months

  4. EQ-5D questionnaire

    Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months

    Quality of life questionnaire

  5. Oswestery disability index

    Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months

  6. Patient global impression of change

    Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months

  7. PainDETECT questionnaire

    Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months

    Characterisation of neuropathic pain components

  8. Mean charge per second used

    Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months

    Measures the amount of electrical charge used

  9. Mean charge per hour used

    Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months

    Measures the amount of electrical charge used

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Jan-Willem Kallewaard, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

Martijn Mons, Msc.

CONTACT

[email protected]

+31433881034

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Rijnstate Hospital

Other

Registry information

Acronym: BURST-RAP

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jun 16, 2022
Registry last updated
Nov 19, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.