Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, Virginia, 24061, United States
NCT Number: NCT05337098
Animal and observational research in humans suggest that specific types of non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) may impair glycemic control. However, whether NNS consumption impacts glucose homeostasis in middle-aged/older adults with prediabetes is unknown, and potential mechanisms by which this could occur have yet to be identified. The overall objective of this R21 proposal is to establish proof-of-concept for alterations in glucose homeostasis following intake of sucralose, but not aspartame, in middle-aged/older adults with prediabetes compared to a eucaloric diet with no NNS.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me40 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Blacksburg, Virginia, 24061, United States
Observational research has linked intake of non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS), which are consumed daily by ~50% of middle-aged/older U.S. adults, with increased risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). This risk may be exacerbated by advancing age, which is associated with low-grade chronic inflammation and increased risk of T2D. Current T2D prevention recommendations related to NNS usage are unclear and confusing; use as an alternative to added sugar intake is suggested but long-term NNS use is discouraged despite minimal research to support this recommendation. Animal and observational human studies suggest detrimental effects of some NNS on glucose homeostasis. Longer-term human studies largely demonstrate null findings. Differences in study design and a lack of rigor in existing research contribute to inconclusive findings. In addition, NNS are often studied as a single entity yet types of NNS vary in their absorption and metabolism (e.g., the two most commonly consumed NNS, sucralose and aspartame). Whether NNS consumption impacts glucose homeostasis in middle-aged/older adults with prediabetes is unknown, and potential mechanisms by which this could occur have yet to be identified. The overall objective of this R21 proposal is to establish proof-of-concept for alterations in glucose homeostasis following intake of sucralose, but not aspartame, in middle-aged/older adults with prediabetes compared to a eucaloric diet with no NNS. We will investigate changes in inflammatory markers as potential mechanisms by which sucralose intake influences glucose homeostasis. Following a 2-week eucaloric lead-in diet, 30 middle-aged/older adults (40+ yrs) with prediabetes will be randomly assigned to 1 of 3 controlled feeding conditions for 6 weeks (10 participants per group): sucralose, aspartame, or a control group (no NNS). Standardized diets will be matched for macronutrients (50% carbohydrate, 35% fat, 15% protein) and other variables to avoid the potential confounds of weight change and dietary factors which may influence study outcomes (e.g., added sugars). All groups will receive identical diets, other than the additional NNS for the two NNS groups. 24-hr glycemic control using continuous glucose monitoring and insulin sensitivity and beta cell function via oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), serum endotoxin, and inflammatory cytokines, including C-reactive protein, will be measured before and following the 6-week dietary treatment period. This research may have clinical practice and policy implications by informing U.S. dietary guidelines and guidelines for T2D prevention, which devote minimal attention to NNS and provide unclear guidance on NNS use due largely to a lack of rigorously-designed controlled feeding trials.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Provision of either aspartame, sucralose, or control with no non-nutritive sweeteners to a controlled feeding study to determine impacts on glucose homeostasis.
Time frame: Pre-intervention CGM AUC was measured for 7 days (last week of 2 week lead in) prior to being randomized into the 4 week intervention. Post-intervention CGM AUC was measured for 7 days during the last week of the 4 week intervention.
mg*hr/dL of glucose via continuous glucose monitoring (Area under the curve, AUC). Participants wore a CGM device for 7 consecutive days prior to pre-intervention testing and 7 consecutive days prior to post-intervention testing. Interstitial glucose concentrations were recorded every 5 minutes.The AUC was measured prior to beginning the controlled feeding for 1 week (during the lead-in phase) and during the last week of the controlled feeding intervention. This was not measured for a certain time frame "post-dose".
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Other
Non-Nutritive Sweetener Consumption (Aspartame and Sucralose) and Glucose Homeostasis in Older Adults With Prediabetes
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05441982
Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Glucose Metabolism Disorders
Blacksburg, Virginia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07375797
Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Diabetes Mellitus
Viborg, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT07483723
Adnexal Diseases, Continuous Glucose Monitoring
Salouël, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06716671
Behavior, Continuous Glucose Monitoring
Barcelona, Spain
View Trial Details