CHU de Brest
Brest, 29609, France
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT05308888
Aortic valve stenosis is the most common valve disease leading to surgical or percutaneous intervention in Europe and North America. Percutaneous aortic valve replacement (TAVI) is currently recommended for the management of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis and with high; very high operative risk of aortic valve replacement surgery or intermediate operative risk of aortic valve replacement surgery after a benefit-risk assessment by a heart team and operative contraindication to conventional aortic valve replacement surgery. These indications are supported by the 2017 European Cardiology guidelines.
This technique of percutaneous arterial valve implantation is most often performed via the femoral route, under local anesthesia, with placement of a prosthetic biological valve in the aortic position, impacting it into the patient's native aortic valve.
TAVI has been shown to be superior to medical treatment in patients with a aortic valve stenosis at very high operative risk of conventional aortic valve replacement surgery. However, the occurrence of atrioventricular conduction disorders (de novo left bundle branch block (LBBB) or complete AVB) remains the most frequent complication after TAVI. Therefore, the rate of pacemaker (PM) implantation after TAVI remains high, ranging from 2% to 51%, with an average rate of 13%.
Pacemaker implantation has several deleterious effects (increased hospitalization time, desynchronization of the left ventricle by permanent right ventricular pacing, exposure of the patient to procedural complications of pacemaker placement, and possible increase in the final cost to society of the initial hospitalization.
Not all patients who received a pacemaker post TAVI implantation use their PM. The rate of Pacemaker dependency and therefore of patients who actually use their pacemaker is approximately 33-36% at 1 year after percutaneous valve implantation.
In view of all the potentially deleterious consequences of post TAVI pacemaker implantation, it is therefore necessary to know which patients really justify pacemaker implantation after percutaneous valve implantation.
The purpose of this study is to investigate diagnostic imaging criteria that may be predictive of the occurrence of intramyocardial conduction disorders post TAVI implantation. Although some patients present only transient conductive disturbances, the impact of tissue inflammation of the intramyocardial conduction pathways after TAVI remains to be understood.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Brest, 29609, France
Location status: Recruiting
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The 18F-FDG PET-CT will be performed in the nuclear medicine department of the CHU of Brest. For this exam, the administration of 2-3 MBq/kg of 18F-FDG ([18F]F-fluorodeoxyglucose) will be performed to the patient in a single intravenous injection.
Time frame: Up to 5 days after TAVI's implantation
The primary end point is "occurrence of conductive disturbance": 1) complete BAV, 2) high-grade BAV, 3) LBBB, 4) RBBB, 5) BAV1; assessed by the performance of post-percutaneous valve implantation electrocardiograms (ECGs) during the initial patient's hospitalization.
Time frame: Up to 5 days after TAVI's implantation, 1, 6 and 12 months
Number of participants requiring pacemaker implantation post-TAVI
Time frame: 1 and 6 month
Simulation rate of the right ventricular lead of the pacemaker at 1 and 6 months after TAVI's implantation
Time frame: 6 month
Occurrence of a conductive disorder (atrioventricular blocks or high-grade atrioventricular block or left buncle branch block or right bundle branch block or atrioventricular block grade 1) within 6 months of discharge from TAVI's hospitalization.
Interested in participating?
Request InfoUniversity Hospital, Brest
Other
Acronym: IMPACT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07715279
AORTIC VALVE DISEASES, Aortic Valve Disease
Chengdu, Sichuan, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06049654
Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Insufficiency
Alessandria, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT06596460
Aortic Stenosis, Severe, Aortic Valve Disease
London, England, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT07008911
Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Stenosis
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial Details