New Haven Clinical Research Unit
New Haven, Connecticut, 06511, United States
NCT Number: NCT05206604
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety, (local and systemic) tolerability, and pharmacokinetics following multiple doses of topically applied, maximum feasible formulations of PF-07295324 (0.12% w/w) or PF-07259955 (2% w/w), on approximately 20% body surface area (BSA), in healthy adult participants.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
New Haven, Connecticut, 06511, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Participants are eligible to be included in the study only if all of the following criteria apply:
Age and Sex:
Weight:
Exclusion criteria
Participants are excluded from the study if any of the following criteria apply:
Medical Conditions:
Prior/Concomitant Therapy:
NOTE regarding COVID vaccines with authorization or approval for emergency use:
There is no requirement for washout of COVID vaccines prior to the first dose of PF-07295324/vehicle or PF-07259955/vehicle if the vaccine is not live attenuated (eg, mRNA, utilizing a viral vector,inactivated virus).There is no protocol-specified requirement for the interruption of IP dosing prior to or after vaccination if the COVID vaccine is not live attenuated.
Prior/Concurrent Clinical Study Experience:
Diagnostic Assessments:
Other Exclusions:
Ointment
Cream
Time frame: Baseline up to the end of follow up (ie, up to 44 days)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. AEs included both SAEs and non-serious AEs. Treatment-related AEs and SAEs were determined by the investigator.
Time frame: At screening, admission (Day -1), on Days 5, 7, 10, at discharge (Day 12), and at early termination if applicable
Hematology parameters included hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, platelet and white blood cell count, total neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils, reticulocytes, and lymphocytes. Chemistry parameters included blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, glucose (fasting), calcium, sodium, potassium, chloride, total bicarbonate, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, uric acid, albumin, total protein. Urine parameters included pH, glucose, protein, blood, ketones, nitrites, leukocyte esterase, urobilinogen, urine bilirubin, microscopy. Only those categories in which at least 1 participant had abnormal data were reported.
Time frame: At screening, on Days 1, 2, 5, 7, 10, 11, at discharge (Day 12), and at early termination if applicable
Criteria for abnormality in vital signs: supine pulse rate <40 beats per minute (bpm) or >120 bpm; supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) <50 mmHg, maximum increase or decrease from baseline of >=20 mmHg; supine systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90 mmHg, maximum increase or decrease from baseline of >=30 mmHg. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to the first dosing. Vital sign abnormalities reported for at least 1 participant are presented here.
Time frame: At screening, on Days 1, 2, 5, 7, 10, 11, at discharge (Day 12), and at early termination if applicable
ECG abnormalities criteria included: 1) maximum QTc interval adjusted according Fridericia formula (QTcF) (msec): 450<= QTcF <480, 480<= QTcF <500, and QTcF >=500; QTcF maximum increase from baseline (msec): 30<= change <60, and change >=60; 2) maximum PR interval (msec): >=300; PR increase from baseline (msec): baseline >200 with 25% increase at maximum, baseline <=200 with 50% increase at maximum; 3) maximum QRS (msec): >=140; QRS increase from baseline (msec) >=50%. Baseline was defined as the average of the last triplicate measurement prior to the first dosing. ECG abnormalities reported for at least 1 participant are presented here.
Time frame: Screening up to Day 12 or early termination if applicable
Application site toleration was assessed by Draize scoring. Draize scores were defined as: 0 = No reaction visible, 1 = Trace reaction - barely perceptible pinkness, 2 = Mild reaction - readily visible pinkness, 3 = Moderate reaction - definite redness, 4 = Strong to severe reaction - very intense redness. Participants with at least 1 instance of Draize score >0 were listed.
Time frame: On Days 1 and 10 at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after application
Cmax was defined as maximum plasma concentration. It was observed directly from data.
Time frame: On Days 1 and 10 at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after application
Tmax was defined as time to reach maximum observed plasma concentration. It was observed directly from data.
Time frame: On Days 1 and 10 at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after application
AUCtau was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to time tau, the dosing interval. tau = 12 hours for BID dosing cohorts and tau = 24 hours for QD dosing cohorts.
Time frame: On Days 1 and 10 at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after application
Cavg was defined as average plasma concentration. It was determined by AUCtau/tau; where tau was the dosing interval and AUCtau was area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to time tau, the dosing interval. tau = 12 hours for BID dosing cohorts and tau = 24 hours for QD dosing cohorts.
Time frame: Pre-dose on Days 1 and 10
Ctrough was defined as pre-dose concentration. It was observed directly from data.
Time frame: On Days 1 and 10 at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after application
Rac(Cmax) was defined as observed accumulation ratio for Cmax and was determined by Cmax on Day 10/Cmax on Day 1. Cmax was defined as maximum plasma concentration. Accumulation ratios was not calculated due to Day 1 Cmax values below the limit of quantification.
Time frame: On Days 1 and 10 at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after application
Rac(AUCtau) was defined as observed accumulation ratio for AUCtau. AUCtau was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to time tau, the dosing interval. tau = 12 hours for BID dosing cohorts and tau = 24 hours for QD dosing cohorts. Rac[AUCtau] was calculated by AUCtau on Day 10/AUCtau on Day 1 and accumulation ratios was not calculated due to Day 1 AUCtau values below the limit of quantification.
Time frame: On Days 1, 2, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, and early termination (if applicable) at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after application
t1/2 was defined as terminal half-life. It was determined by Loge(2)/kel, where kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log linear concentration time curve.
Time frame: On Days 1, 2, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, and early termination (if applicable) at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after application
CL/F was defined as aparent clearance. It was determined by Dose/AUCtau. AUCtau was area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to time tau, the dosing interval (12 hours for BID cohorts and 24 hours for QD cohorts).
Time frame: On Days 1, 2, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, and early termination (if applicable) at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after application
Vz/F was defined as apparant volume of distribution. It was determined by Dose/(AUCtau * kel). AUCtau was area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to time tau, the dosing interval (12 hours for BID cohorts and 24 hours for QD cohorts). kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log linear concentration time curve.
Time frame: On Days 1 and 10 at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after application
Cmax was defined as maximum plasma concentration. It was observed directly from data.
Time frame: On Days 1 and 10 at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after application
Tmax was defined as time to reach maximum observed plasma concentration. It was observed directly from data.
Time frame: On Days 1 and 10 at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after application
AUCtau was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to time tau, the dosing interval. tau = 12 hours for BID dosing cohorts.
Time frame: On Days 1 and 10 at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after application
Cavg was defined as average plasma concentration. It was determined by AUCtau/tau; where tau was the dosing interval and AUCtau was area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to time tau, the dosing interval. tau = 12 hours for BID dosing cohorts.
Time frame: Pre-dose on Days 1 and 10
Ctrough was defined as pre-dose concentration. It was observed directly from data.
Time frame: On Days 1 and 10 at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after application
Rac(Cmax) was defined as observed accumulation ratio for Cmax and was determined by Cmax on Day 10/Cmax on Day 1. Cmax was defined as maximum plasma concentration.
Time frame: On Days 1 and 10 at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after application
Rac(AUCtau) was defined as observed accumulation ratio for AUCtau. AUCtau was defined as area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to time tau, the dosing interval. tau = 12 hours for BID dosing cohorts. Accumulation ratios was not calculated due to Day 1 AUCtau values below the limit of quantification.
Time frame: On Days 1, 2, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, and early termination (if applicable) at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after application
t1/2 was defined as terminal half-life. It was determined by Loge(2)/kel, where kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log linear concentration time curve.
Time frame: On Days 1, 2, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, and early termination (if applicable) at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after application
CL/F was defined as aparent clearance. It was determined by Dose/AUCtau. AUCtau was area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to time tau, the dosing interval (12 hours for BID cohorts and 24 hours for QD cohorts).
Time frame: On Days 1, 2, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, and early termination (if applicable) at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours after application
Vz/F was defined as apparant volume of distribution. It was determined by Dose/(AUCtau * kel). AUCtau was area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to time tau, the dosing interval (12 hours for BID cohorts and 24 hours for QD cohorts). kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log linear concentration time curve.
Pfizer
Industry
A PHASE 1, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, SPONSOR-OPEN, VEHICLE-CONTROLLED, FIRST-IN-HUMAN, MULTIPLE-DOSE STUDY, TO INVESTIGATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, AND PHARMACOKINETICS, OF TOPICALLY ADMINISTERED PF-07295324 AND PF-07259955, IN HEALTHY ADULT PARTICIPANTS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07374406
Healthy
Jeonju, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT07365865
Deficient Keratinized Mucosa, Healthy
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT04849923
Healthy
Winterthur, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT06744517
Behavior, Healthy
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial Details