Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04958694

CEDARS Intervention: A Coping, Emotional Development, & Stress Reduction Intervention

Using an adapted stress-reduction intervention called the CEDARS, the investigators will pilot the intervention in adolescents (N=40) to determine the feasibility and acceptability of CEDARS implementation and to investigate adolescent stress reduction. As an exploratory aim, the investigators will explore the influence of the CEDARS on CMH-related behaviors and CMH. The investigators expect that those adolescents who undergo the intervention will have the greatest improvement in mental health symptoms than their waitlisted counterparts. Our secondary hypothesis is that those who report more adversity will also report greater improvement in mental health symptoms than their peers.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

14 year–19 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

About this study

This intervention has been adapted based on feedback from previous focus groups with adolescents, clinical staff, community stakeholders, and a CEDARS workgroup.

Participants will be divided into two groups - 20 in the intervention group and 20 in the waitlisted group.

Adolescents in the intervention group will participate in 7 weekly, 1-hour sessions. This online intervention will feature positive affect and stress reduction skills delivered via self-paced and self-guided modules. The skills are taught through brief didactic and semi-interactive videos followed by invitations and opportunities for practice within the session and at home. Participants will complete a baseline, mid-point, and post-intervention survey to determine the influence of the intervention.

There will be one follow-up survey with participants after the intervention. The survey will take place 1 month after the program has concluded.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adolescents ages 13-20
  • Adolescents able to speak and understand English fluently
  • Adolescents with reliable internet access (for virtual access to online modules)

Exclusion criteria

  • Individuals younger than age 13 and older than age 20
  • Individuals who are not able to speak or understand English fluently
  • Individuals without reliable internet access

Treatment and study plan

CEDARS

Behavioral

This intervention is intended to help adolescents cope with stress and improve positive affect.

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility: Percentage of Recruitment Target Enrollment Met

    Time frame: Baseline

    This measurement reflects the number of participants recruited compared to the recruitment target goal.

  2. Feasibility:4 of 7 Intervention Modules Completed

    Time frame: Endpoint (8 Weeks after intervention start)

    Feasibility was defined as the proportion of participants who completed at least 4 of the 7 core intervention modules during the study period.

  3. Feasibility: Mean Intervention Module Completion

    Time frame: Endpoint (8 Weeks after intervention start)

    Intervention module completion was defined as the mean number of modules the intervention participants completed during the study period.

  4. Acceptability: Participant Satisfaction Score ≥8 of 10

    Time frame: Endpoint (8 Weeks after intervention start)

    Acceptability was defined as participant satisfaction with the intervention, measured using a 1-10 satisfaction scale, with scores ≥8 indicating intervention acceptability.

  5. Acceptability: Mean Participant Satisfaction

    Time frame: Endpoint (8 Weeks after intervention start)

    Acceptability was defined as participant satisfaction with the intervention measured using a 1-10 satisfaction scale, with scores ≥8 indicating positive acceptability.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Depressive Symptoms

    Time frame: Baseline, Midpoint (Week 4), Endpoint (Week 8), and 1-month follow-up

    The PHQ-9 is a self-administered depression module of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ). It contains 9 questions that help identify patients with clinically meaningful symptoms of depression. Patient responses are scored 0-3 with 0 representing "not at all" and 3 indicating "nearly every day;" thus, the PHQ-9 contains a total score range of 0-27. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms. No specific administration time could be found, but a reasonable administration time is approximately 5-10 minutes for cognitively intact patients. PHQ-9 questions are straightforward and pertain to depressive symptoms experienced over the past 2 weeks that include anhedonia, dysphoria, sleep disturbances, fatigue, changes in eating, low self-esteem, concentration difficulties, hypo-or-hyper-active behaviors, and thoughts of suicide or homicide.

  2. Anxiety Symptoms

    Time frame: Baseline, Midpoint (4 weeks), Endpoint (8 weeks), 1 month post intervention

    The GAD-7 is a 7-item self-report questionnaire used to measure the severity of generalized anxiety disorder, with total scores ranging from 0 to 21 based on a 4-point scale (0-3). Scores of 5, 10, and 15 represent cut-points for mild, moderate, and severe anxiety, respectively. A score of 10 or higher is the recommended threshold for identifying probable cases of GAD.

  3. Positive Affect

    Time frame: Baseline, Midpoint (4 weeks), Endpoint (8 weeks), 1 month post intervention

    PANAS-C SF Scale: In this 10-item scale, the 5 positive affect (PA) items are summed to obtain a PA score, and the 5 negative affect (NA) items are summed to obtain an NA score. Each question is scored 1- "not much or not at all" to 5- "a lot. Higher scores on each scale indicate higher levels of engagement within that particular affect, although there is no cutoff threshold.

  4. Perceived Stress

    Time frame: Baseline, Midpoint (4 weeks), Endpoint (8 weeks), 1 month post intervention

    The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is a widely used, self-report psychological instrument designed to measure the degree to which individuals appraise situations in their lives as uncontrollable, unpredictable, and overwhelming. The general scoring guidelines are 0-13: Low stress, 14-26: Moderate stress, 27-40: High perceived stress.

  5. Flourishing

    Time frame: Baseline, Midpoint (4 weeks), Endpoint (8 weeks), 1 month post intervention

    The Flourishing Scale (FS; Diener et al., 2010) is a brief 8-item summary measure of the respondent's self-perceived success in important areas such as relationships, self-esteem, purpose, and optimism. It was designed to measure social-psychological prosperity and to complement existing measures of subjective well-being. The FS provides a single psychological well-being score. All items are rated on a 7-point Likert-type scale where 1 = strongly disagree and 7 = strongly agree. All items are phrased in a positive direction. Scores can range from 8 (Strong Disagreement with all items) to 56 (Strong Agreement with all items). Higher scores indicate greater flourshing.

  6. Negative Affect

    Time frame: Baseline, Midpoint (4 weeks), Endpoint (8 weeks), 1 month post intervention

    PANAS-C SF Scale: In this 10-item scale, the 5 positive affect (PA) items are summed to obtain a PA score, and the 5 negative affect (NA) items are summed to obtain an NA score. Each question is scored 1- "not much or not at all" to 5- "a lot. Higher scores on each scale indicate higher levels of engagement within that particular affect, although there is no cutoff threshold.

  7. Resilient Coping

    Time frame: Baseline, Midpoint, Endpoint. 1 Month Post-Intervention

    The Brief Resilient Coping Scale captures tendencies to cope with stress adaptively. The scale focuses on the tendency to effectively use coping strategies in flexible, committed ways to actively solve problems despite stressful circumstances. Total score: Total sum scores range from 4 to 20. Scores of 4-13 indicate low resilient coping, 14-16 indicate medium resilient coping and 17-20 indicate high resilient coping.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Coping and Emotional Development for Adolescents to Reduce Stress for Adolescents

Acronym: CEDARS

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jul 12, 2021
Registry last updated
Aug 17, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.