The Aga Khan University
Karachi, Pakistan
NCT Number: NCT04957108
Smart phone-based applications to identify cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) are extremely useful in circumstances where urgent device interrogation is needed and device identification card is not available. Few studies have provided insight regarding the utility of these applications. We have studied two widely available applications i.e., Pacemaker ID app (PMIDa) or Cardiac Rhythm Management Devices-Finder (CRMD-f) to identiy device manufacturers in CIEDs.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Observational
Karachi, Pakistan
Smart phone-based applications to identify cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) are extremely useful in circumstances where urgent device interrogation is needed and device identification card is not available. Few studies have provided insight regarding the utility of these applications. We have studied two widely available applications i.e., Pacemaker ID app (PMIDa) or Cardiac Rhythm Management Devices-Finder (CRMD-f) to identiy device manufacturers in CIEDs.
547 patients who underwent CIED implantation from year 2016 - 2020 in our institute were enrolled. There were 438 Medtronic and 109 St. Jude's devices. All chest radiographs were de-identified and resized into 225*225 pixels focusing on the CIED. PMIDa and CRMD-f applications were used to identify CIED. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value for both applications were calculated and compared.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
PMIDa and CRMD-f applications were used to identify CIED
Time frame: Upto 6 months of enrollment
Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value for both Pacemaker ID app and CRMD finder app. Above mentioned values shall be calculated after analysing data in SPSS and doing cross tabulation. Values will be in percentages.
Time frame: Upto 6 months of enrollment
sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value for both Pacemaker ID app and CRMD finder app. Above mentioned values shall be calculated after analysing data in SPSS and doing cross tabulation. Values will be in percentages.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAga Khan University Hospital, Pakistan
Other
Comparing Sensitivity and Specificity of Pacemaker ID Application and Cardiac Rhythm Management Device-Finder Application in Identifying Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Manufacturer Using Chest Radiograph - an Observational Study.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03405740
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Cardiac Arrhythmia
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07792772
Acute Heart Failure (AHF), Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT04841304
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Cardiac Arrhythmia
Copenhagen, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT07205367
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Cardiac Arrhythmia
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial Details