Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04920097

Auricular Point Acupressure to Manage Chemotherapy Induced Neuropathy

The proposed randomized control trial will evaluate auricular point acupressure (APA) on chemotherapy-induced neuropathy (CIN), rigorously considering point specificity and placebo effects by integrating self-report measures, psychophysical measures (QST), endogenous biomarkers (cytokines), and neuro-imaging to investigate APA's efficacy and underlying mechanism(s).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Chemotherapy-induced neuropathy (CIN)-pain, numbness, or tingling distributed in the hands and feet-produces persistent symptoms affecting sensation and balance in cancer survivors. Up to 50% of cancer survivors still suffer CIN 6 years after treatment. Duloxetine, the only recommended drug by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, was found to be superior to placebo but improved CIN by only 0.73 points (0-10 scale). No effective treatment for CIN has been established except exercise, with an effect size of <0.508. Opioids relieve CIN pain, but long-term use is strongly discouraged due to opioid overuse.

The investigators propose to test auricular point acupressure (APA), an innovative and scalable solution developed from auricular acupuncture. APA is a non-invasive (needleless) and active treatment for patients with pain, whereas acupuncture is an invasive (using needles) and passive treatment (administered by a licensed practitioner). In APA, small seeds are taped on specific ear points by a skilled provider and patients press on the seeds to stimulate ear points three times daily, three minutes per time, for a total of nine minutes per day. APA provides pain relief within 1-2 minutes after ear stimulation and sustains pain relief for one month after a 4-week APA intervention. APA is popular in Taiwan, China, and Europe. Though its use is sparse in the U.S., a limited number of clinical trials have supported APA in pain management.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • cancer patients ages ≥18 years
  • have received a medication in one of the following categories: platinum-based, vinca alkaloids, bortezomib, eribulin, and/or taxanes
  • have CIN due to receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy for cancer or have pre-existing peripheral neuropathy of another etiology that worsened after chemotherapy
  • have one of the average intensity of pain, or numbness, or tingling on their extremities the previous week due to CIN ≥ 4 on a 11-point numerical scale.

Exclusion criteria

  • use of an investigational agent for pain control concurrently or within the past 30 days
  • use of an implantable drug delivery system, e.g. Medtronic SynchroMed®
  • prior celiac plexus block or other neurolytic pain control treatment
  • other identified causes of painful paresthesia existing prior to chemotherapy (e.g., radiation or malignant plexopathy, lumbar or cervical radiculopathy,)
  • allergy to latex (the tapes for the APA include latex) and/or having a history of allergic reactions to the adhesive tape
  • pregnant women (based on the self-reported data)
  • individuals diagnosed with diabetic neuropathy

Treatment and study plan

In-person training for seed placement and APA

Other

In-person seed placement and a training for the participant or their caregiver to place the seeds on the ear points.

Virtual training for seed placement and APA

Other

Self-administer APA by placing the seeds according to the video instruction found in the self-guided smartphone application for understanding and administering APA. Participant and/or a caregiver will follow the video instruction on seed placement.

Other names: Self-guided smartphone app with video instruction for seed placement and APA

Usual Care

Other

Participants will continue with usual care from oncologist.

Post-training zoom session for seed placement and APA coaching

Other

Zoom session for seed placement and APA coaching, to occur after initial APA and seed placement training (initial training is either in person or guided by the smartphone app videos).

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Severity as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after baseline

    Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) assesses worst pain severity. The scale ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain), a higher score indicates greater pain

  2. Numbness as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after Baseline

    Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) assesses worst numbness. The scale ranges from 0 (no numbness) to 10 (severe numbness), a higher score indicates greater numbness.

  3. Tingling as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after baseline

    Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) assesses worst Tingling. The scale ranges from 0 (no tingling) to 10 (severe tingling), a higher score indicates greater tingling.

  4. Stiffness as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after baseline

    Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) assesses worst stiffness. The scale ranges from 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (severe stiffness), a higher score indicates greater stiffness.

  5. Grade of Peripheral Motor Neuropathy as Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after baseline

    Peripheral motor neuropathy is graded using the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0. Severity is graded on a scale that ranges from 1 to 5, with higher grade indicating greater severity of neuropathy.

  6. Grade of Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy as Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after baseline

    Peripheral sensory neuropathy is graded using the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0. Severity is graded on a scale that ranges from 1 to 5, with higher grade indicating greater severity of neuropathy.

  7. Physical Function as Assessed by The Revised BPI-CIN Pain Interference Subscale

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after Baseline

    The BPI-CIN Interference subscale will be used to measure physical function caused by CIN. The seven items evaluate interference with general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other persons, sleep, and enjoyment of life. Each item is rated on a 0-10 numeric scale (0 = does not interfere; 10 = completely interferes). The overall score is calculated as the mean of the seven items with a total score ranging from 0 to 10 to determine the level of interference, with higher scores indicating greater interference.

  8. Functional Ability as Assessed by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Scale

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after Baseline

    The ECOG Performance Status Scale describes level of functioning in terms of ability to care for oneself, daily activity, and physical. Score on the ECOG ranges from 0 (fully active and able) to 5 (dead) with higher score indicating lower function:

    0 - Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction

    • - Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work
    • - Ambulatory and capable of all selfcare but unable to carry out any work activities; up and about more than 50% of waking hours
    • - Capable of only limited selfcare; confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours
    • - Completely disabled; cannot carry on any selfcare; totally confined to bed or chair
    • - Dead
  9. Quality of Life as Assessed by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 -Physical Function Subscale

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after baseline

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 - physical function subscale assesses physical function using 4 items, each scored on a 5-point likert scale (1 = Unable to do; 5 = Without any difficulty). Raw scores ranging from 4 to 20 are converted to standardized T-scores (population mean = 50, Standard deviation = 10) using HealthMeasures tables with a range of approximately 20-80. The higher T-scores indicate better physical function.

  10. Quality of Life as Assessed by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 -Fatigue Subscale

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after baseline

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 - fatigue subscale assesses fatigue using 4 items, each scored on a 5-point likert scale (1 = Unable to do; 5 = Without any difficulty). Raw scores ranging from 4 to 20 are converted to standardized T-scores (population mean = 50, Standard deviation = 10) using HealthMeasures tables with a range of approximately 20-80. The higher T-scores indicate greater fatigue.

  11. Quality of Life as Assessed by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 -Pain Interference Subscale

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after baseline

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 - pain interference subscale assesses how pain interferes with daily activities using 4 items, each scored on a 5-point likert scale (1 = Unable to do; 5 = Without any difficulty). Raw scores ranging from 4 to 20 are converted to standardized T-scores (population mean = 50, Standard deviation = 10) using HealthMeasures tables with a range of approximately 20-80. The higher T-scores indicate greater pain interference.

  12. Quality of Life as Assessed by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 -Depression Subscale

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after baseline

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 - depression subscale assesses depression using 4 items, each scored on a 5-point likert scale (1 = Unable to do; 5 = Without any difficulty). Raw scores ranging from 4 to 20 are converted to standardized T-scores (population mean = 50, Standard deviation = 10) using HealthMeasures tables with a range of approximately 20-80. The higher T-scores indicate greater depression severity.

  13. Quality of Life as Assessed by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 -Anxiety Subscale

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after baseline

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 - anxiety subscale assesses anxiety using 4 items, each scored on a 5-point likert scale (1 = Unable to do; 5 = Without any difficulty). Raw scores ranging from 4 to 20 are converted to standardized T-scores (population mean = 50, Standard deviation = 10) using HealthMeasures tables with a range of approximately 20-80. The higher T-scores indicate greater anxiety.

  14. Quality of Life as Assessed by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 -Sleep Disturbance Subscale

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after baseline

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 - sleep disturbance subscale assesses sleep disturbance using 4 items, each scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Unable to do; 5 = Without any difficulty). Raw scores ranging from 4 to 20 are converted to standardized T-scores (population mean = 50, Standard deviation = 10) using HealthMeasures tables with a range of approximately 20-80. The higher T-scores indicate greater sleep disturbance.

  15. Quality of Life as Assessed by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 -Ability to Participate in Social Activities Subscale

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after baseline

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 - ability to participate in social activities subscale assesses a participant's perceived ability to engage in usual social roles and activities using 4 items, each scored on a 5-point likert scale (1 = Unable to do; 5 = Without any difficulty). Raw scores ranging from 4 to 20 are converted to standardized T-scores (population mean = 50, Standard deviation = 10) using HealthMeasures tables with a range of approximately 20-80. The higher T-scores indicate better and higher functioning social participation.

  16. Upper Limb Function as Assessed by the Quick Dash Index

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after baseline

    The QuickDASH Index assesses upper limb disability and symptoms. It evaluates limitations in daily activities (e.g., opening jars, performing housework), as well as pain, tingling, and sleep disturbances. The total score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability), with higher scores indicating greater disability.

  17. Symptoms Severity as Assessed by the MD Anderson Symptom Severity Inventory

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after Baseline

    The MD Anderson Sympton Severity Inventory assesses severity of 13 common symptoms experienced by patients with cancer. Each item is rated on a 0-10 numeric scale (0 = not present; 10 = as bad as you can imagine). The overall symptom severity score is calculated as the mean of the 13 items with a range of 0 to 10, higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.

  18. Pain Self Efficacy as Assessed by Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after Baseline

    Pain self-efficacy is assessed using the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ). This 10-item instrument measures a participant's confidence in performing daily activities, social life and function despite pain. Each item is rated on a 0-6 scale (0 = Not at all confident; 6 = Completely confident) and total score ranges from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy and greater confidence in coping.

  19. Psychological Impact of Pain as Assessed by the Pain Catastrophizing Score

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after Baseline

    The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) assesses components of catastrophizing: rumination, magnification, and helplessness. The total score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating greater pain catastrophizing.

  20. Number of Chronic Overlapping Pain Conditions as Assessed by the Chronic Overlapping Pain Conditions (COPC)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after Baseline

    Chronic Overlapping Pain Conditions (COPC) are assessed using the Chronic Overlapping Pain Conditions Screener (COPCS). This instrument identifies the presence of up to 10 common chronic pain conditions. The COPC total score is calculated as the number of positively identified conditions (answered "Yes"), with higher scores indicating greater pain impact, central sensitization, and severity.

  21. Charlson Comorbidity Index

    Time frame: Baseline

    The Charlson Comorbidity index assesses a participant's comorbidity burden and predicted risk of mortality. The total score ranges from 0 to 37. A higher score indicates greater comorbidity burden and higher risk of mortality.

  22. Pain Impact as Assessed by Pain, Enjoyment and General Activity (PEG) Scale

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after baseline

    Pain, Enjoyment and General Activity (PEG) is a three-item questionnaire that assesses pain intensity and its impact patient's daily life. Each item is rated on a 0-10 scale. The PEG score is calculated as the mean of three items, resulting in score range of 0 to 10, with a higher scores indicating greater pain severity and functional interference.

  23. Number of Participants Reporting Opioid Use

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 28

  24. Opioid Use Per Day as Measured by the Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME) Per Day

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 28

    Opioid use will be collected via EMA diary using a questionnaire. Milligram Morphine Equivalent (MME) will be determined by using an equivalency factor to calculate a dose of morphine equivalent to the ordered opioid. Daily morphine equivalent dosing is sum of the MME of all opioids a patient is likely to take within 24 hours, and will be calculated to MME for analysis. Baseline was defined as the first day of opioid use recorded in the EMA diary.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Experimental Pain Sensitivity as Assessed by a Multimodal Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) Battery - Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT)-Trapezius

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after Baseline

    In order to measure experimental pain sensitivity, a multimodal Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) battery will be completed: pressure pain threshold (PPT), Mechanical Temporal Summation (MTS), and Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM). To assess PPT, a handheld digital pressure algometer (Wagner, Greenwich, CT) was applied at a constant rate of 2.9 Newton per centimeter squared (N/cm^2) per second to the participant's trapezius and thumbs. Participants were asked to notify the experimenter when the pressure sensation ''first becomes painful." The pressure at which participants indicated that the pressure sensation ''first becomes painful" is reported.

  2. Experimental Pain Sensitivity as Assessed by a Multimodal Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) Battery - Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT)-Thumb

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after Baseline

    In order to measure experimental pain sensitivity, a multimodal Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) battery will be completed: pressure pain threshold (PPT), Mechanical Temporal Summation (MTS), and Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM). To assess PPT, a handheld digital pressure algometer (Wagner, Greenwich, CT) was applied at a constant rate of 2.9 Newton per centimeter squared (N/cm^2) per second to the participant's trapezius and thumbs. Participants were asked to notify the experimenter when the pressure sensation ''first becomes painful." The pressure at which participants indicated that the pressure sensation ''first becomes painful" is reported.

  3. Experimental Pain Sensitivity as Assessed by a Multimodal Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) Battery - Mechanical Temporal Summation (MTS)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after Baseline

    In order to measure experimental pain sensitivity, a multimodal Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) battery will be completed: pressure pain threshold (PPT), Mechanical Temporal Summation (MTS), and Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM). To assess MTS, a single pinprick stimulus (e.g., via a weighted pinprick stimulator or Neuropen) is applied, followed by a series of 10 rapid, identical stimuli at the same location, usually at a rate of 1/second, to measure the change in pain sensation. Participants rate their pain after the stimuli using a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable. A higher score means greater pain sensitivity and increased temporal summation. MTS is calculated as the increase in pain intensity rating (Δ change score) between the first stimulus and the end of the series.

  4. Experimental Pain Sensitivity as Assessed by a Multimodal Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) Battery - Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after Baseline

    In order to measure experimental pain sensitivity, a multimodal Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) battery will be completed: pressure pain threshold (PPT), Mechanical Temporal Summation (MTS), and Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM). CPM was assessed as the change in PPT on the trapezius immediately after the immersion of the contralateral hand up to the wrist in a cold-water bath (Neslab, Portsmouth, NH) at 4 degrees Celsius for 20 seconds. [ [To assess PPT, a handheld digital pressure algometer (Wagner, Greenwich, CT) was applied at a constant rate of 2.9 Newton per centimeter squared (N/cm^2) per second to the participant's trapezius. Participants were asked to notify the experimenter when the pressure sensation ''first becomes painful" to assess pressure pain threshold (PPT).]

  5. Functional Connectivity Changes in Salience Network - Basal Ganglia Network (SAL-BGN) as Assessed by fMRI Neuroimaging

    Time frame: Baseline

    Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) will be used to assess changes in functional connectivity between the Salience Network and Basal Ganglia Network (SAL-BGN) from baseline to post-intervention (1 month after baseline). Functional connectivity is calculated based on the correlations in Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) signal fluctuations in different brain regions. Connectivity strength will be quantified using Fisher z-transformed correlation coefficients, with higher values indicating stronger functional connectivity.

  6. Functional Connectivity Changes in Language Network - Basal Ganglia Network (LAN-BGN) as Assessed by fMRI Neuroimaging

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after Baseline

    Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) will be used to assess changes in functional connectivity between the Salience Network and Basal Ganglia Network (SAL-BGN) from baseline to post-intervention (1 month after baseline). Functional connectivity is calculated based on the correlations in Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) signal fluctuations in different brain regions. Connectivity strength will be quantified using Fisher z-transformed correlation coefficients, with higher values indicating stronger functional connectivity.

  7. The Grooved Pegboard Test-Dominant Hand

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after baseline

    The Grooved Pegboard Test assesses fine motor skills, speed, and visual-motor coordination. Participants are asked to place 25 pegs into slots as quickly as possible. The total time to complete the task is recorded in seconds with dominant hand. Higher times indicate slower performance and reduced dexterity

  8. The Grooved Pegboard Test-Non Dominant Hand

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after Baseline

    The Grooved Pegboard Test assesses fine motor skills, speed, and visual-motor coordination. Participants are asked to place 25 pegs into slots as quickly as possible. The total time to complete the task is recorded in seconds with non-dominant hand. Higher times indicate slower performance and reduced dexterity

  9. Interleukin-1 Alpha Level (From Plasma)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after Baseline

    Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers. Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40 and p70), IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β) were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay. Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.

  10. Interleukin-1 Beta Level (From Plasma)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after Baseline

    Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers. Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40 and p70), IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β) were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay. Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.

  11. Interleukin-2 Level (From Plasma)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after Baseline

    Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers. Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40 and p70), IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β) were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay. Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.

  12. Interleukin-4 Level (From Plasma)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after Baseline

    Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers. Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40 and p70), IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β) were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay. Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.

  13. Interleukin-6 Level (From Plasma)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after Baseline

    Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers. Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40 and p70), IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β) were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay. Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.

  14. Interleukin-8 Level (From Plasma)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after Baseline

    Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers. Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40 and p70), IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β) were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay. Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.

  15. Interleukin-10 Level (From Plasma)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after Baseline

    Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers. Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40 and p70), IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β) were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay. Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.

  16. Interleukin-12 Level (p40) (From Plasma)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after Baseline

    Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers. Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40 and p70), IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β) were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay. Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.

  17. Interleukin-12 Level (p70)-(From Plasma)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after Baseline

    Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers. Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40 and p70), IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β) were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay. Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.

  18. Interleukin-13 Level (From Plasma)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after Baseline

    Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers. Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40 and p70), IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β) were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay. Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.

  19. Interleukin-17 Level (From Plasma)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after Baseline

    Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers. Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40 and p70), IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β) were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay. Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.

  20. Interferon-gamma Level (From Plasma)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after Baseline

    Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers. Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40 and p70), IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β) were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay. Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.

  21. Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha Level (From Plasma)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers. Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40 and p70), IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β) were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay. Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.

  22. Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha Level (From Plasma)

    Time frame: 1 month after baseline

    Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers. Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40 and p70), IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β) were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay. Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.

  23. Transforming Growth Factor-beta Level 1(From Plasma)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers. Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40 and p70), IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β) were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay. Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.

  24. Transforming Growth Factor-beta Level 1 (From Plasma)

    Time frame: 1 month after baseline

    Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers. Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40 and p70), IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β) were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay. Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.

  25. Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide Level(From Plasma)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after baseline

    Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers. Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay. Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.

  26. Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 Level (From Plasma)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after baseline

    Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers. Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay. Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.

  27. Eotaxin Level (From Plasma)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after baseline

    Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers. Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay. Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.

  28. C-reactive Protein Level (From Plasma)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month after baseline

    Blood samples were collected to measure cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers. Serum concentrations of cytokines and chemokines were quantified using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay. Biomarker concentrations were analyzed as indicators of inflammatory response at baseline and 1 month after baseline.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Other

Collaborators

  • Johns Hopkins University
  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jun 9, 2021
Registry last updated
Aug 4, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.