Hyperimmune immunoglobulin to SARS-CoV-2 (hIVIG)
BiologicalThe hIVIG product is administered as a single dose of 3.5 grams, or 35 milliliter at a concentration of 0.1 grams/milliliter.
NCT Number: NCT04910269
The primary objective of the Outpatient Treatment with Anti-Coronavirus Immunoglobulin (OTAC) (INSIGHT 012) trial is to compare the safety and efficacy of a single infusion of anti-COVID-19 hyperimmune intravenous immunoglobulin (hIVIG) versus placebo among adults with recently diagnosed severe acute respiratory syndrome - coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) infection who do not require hospitalization. The primary endpoint of this double-blind randomized trial is a five-category ordinal outcome that assesses the participant's clinical status seven days after the infusion of hIVIG or placebo.
1. Asymptomatic and no limitations in usual activity due to COVID-19 2. Mild COVID-19 illness or minor limitations to usual activity 3. Moderate COVID-19 illness and with major limitations to usual activity 4. Severe COVID-19 or serious disease manifestation from COVID-19 5. Critical illness from COVID-19 or Death
Two strata of participants will be identified for analysis purposes. Stratum 2 will be participants who receive direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) or other anti-SARS-CoV2 agents that are approved/available and recommended for use as part of standard of care (SOC), estimated to be about 20% of participants. Stratum 1 will be participants who do not receive this agents, estimated to be about 80% of participants.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Instituto Medico Platense, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
The primary objective will be addressed by testing two hypotheses aimed at assessing whether hIVIG + standard of care (SOC) is superior to placebo + SOC for the primary ordinal endpoint at Day 7. These hypotheses will be tested for the following two groups: a) among all randomized participants (stratum 1 and 2), and b) among only participants enrolled in stratum 1. For the primary analysis, overall type 1 error will be controlled at 5% by using a 2-sided significance level of 0.035 for each hypothesis. This significance level was obtained using the correlation between the test statistics for the proportional log odds ratio for all randomized participants and for this log odds ratio for those in stratum 1. This correlation was determined to be 0.895. With this approach hIVIG will be considered superior to placebo if either of the two hypotheses is rejected.
Participants will be randomized to a single infusion of an hIVIG product or placebo in a 1:1 allocation. Randomization will be stratified by study site pharmacy and the two SOC strata.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Ongoing immunosuppressive condition or immunosuppressive treatment, includes:
Exclusion criteria
The hIVIG product is administered as a single dose of 3.5 grams, or 35 milliliter at a concentration of 0.1 grams/milliliter.
Infusion of 35 milliliters standard isotonic saline
Time frame: 7 days
The primary outcome is to compare the safety and efficacy of a single infusion of hIVIG versus placebo on clinical status after seven days. Outcome will be reported as the percent of participants who fall into each of 5 clinical status categories as defined below.
Time frame: 28 days
Outcome reported as the percent of participants who are hospitalized or who expire for any reason by day 28 post treatment.
Time frame: 28 days
Outcome reported as the percent of participants who expire for any reason by day 28 post treatment.
Time frame: 28 days
Outcome is reported as the number of participants with significant disease progression through 28 days, which is defined by fulfilling criteria for category 4 or 5 on the ordinal scale using a time to event analysis.
Time frame: 4, 14, 28 days
Outcome will be reported as the percent of participants who fall into each of 5 clinical status categories as defined below at days 4, 14, and 28 following treatment.
Time frame: 7 days
Outcome is reported as the proportion of participants with any disease progression at Day 7, using a sliding dichotomous scale progression defined by a categorization on the ordinal scale that is worse than the status at entry.
Time frame: 7 days
Outcome is reported as the proportion of participants who progress to categories 3-5 on the clinical ordinal scale at Day 7 among participants in categories 1 or 2 of the ordinal scale at entry.
Time frame: 7, 14, 28 days
Outcome is reported as the percent of participants who experience severe disease progression during follow-up, defined by the worst health status achieved on the clinical ordinal scale at any point by Day 7, 14, and 28.
Time frame: 7, 14, 28 days
Outcome is reported as the percent of participants who attain their pre-COVID health status without limitations in usual activity (defined as category 1 on the ordinal scale) at Day 7, 14, and 28.
Time frame: 7 days
Outcome is reported as the change between Day 0 and Day 7 in viral burden as determined by serum antigen levels from nasal and saliva specimens.
Time frame: 7 days
Outcome is reported as the change between Day 0 and Day 7 in viral burden as determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from nasal and saliva specimens.
Time frame: 7 days
Outcome is reported as the change in SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels between Day 0 and Day 7, including subclasses and neutralizing titers.
Time frame: 28 days
Outcome is reported as the percent of participants who had health care engagement for the purposes of medical evaluation and/or management of COVID-19 illness (e.g., via telehealth, clinic, urgent care, emergency room, or hospitalization) at 28 days follow-up.
Time frame: 28 days
Outcome is reported as the number of participants who experience each of the following categories as their worst respiratory status through 28 days, including: a) no respiratory symptoms, b) upper respiratory symptoms, c) lower respiratory symptoms without hypoxia, c) hypoxia requiring conventional oxygen supplementation by nasal canula, d) respiratory failure requiring high-flow oxygen delivery device or non-invasive ventilation, or e) respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation or extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).
Time frame: 7 days
Outcome is reported as the mean oxygen saturation (percentage) level in each group at 7 days.
Time frame: 28 days
Outcome is reported as the number of patients starting other treatments targeting COVID-19 through 28 days post treatment.
University of Minnesota
Other
An International Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of Anti-Coronavirus Hyperimmune Intravenous Immunoglobulin for the Treatment of Adult Outpatients in Early Stages of COVID-19
Acronym: OTAC
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04363268
COVID, COVID-19
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04385251
COVID, COVID-19
Denver, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04362150
COVID, COVID-19
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06821139
COVID, COVID - 19
Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
View Trial Details