Ex Vivo Intraarterial Methylene Blue Injection Improve Nodal Staging Accuracy in Colorectal Cancer

Background:

Colorectal Cancer is the second most common cause of death in Hungary. The most important prognostic and predictive factor of colorectal cancer is the stage of disease at the time of diagnosis. Precise staging, especially nodal staging is highly important for correct planning of oncotherapy, i.e. adjuvant chemotherapy. Nodal staging relies on the proper surgical removal of mesocolon/mesorectum belonging to the the affected colorectal segment, as well as on the thorough pathology work-up of the specimen.

Current quality standards require examination of a minimum of 12 lymph nodes in order to reliably report N0 stage.

Methylene-blue injection into the main supplying artery of the removed specimen is one of the simplest and most effective techniques described to aid pathologist in lymph node harvesting.

Technique of methylene blue injection:

First of all, surgeon need to en block remove the affected colorectal segment with its mesecolon/mesorectum. Then the surgeon isolates the main supplying artery and cannulated it with an appropriate-size canula.

Methylene blue solution (50 mg methylene blue diluted in in 30 ml saline) is prepared and injected into the freshly removed specimen via the canula until the blue solution appears on the cut edges of the specimen.

The specimen can be processed in a routine way (placed in 4% formaldehyde).

Aim of the study:

The aim is to investigate if the well described and in Western-European healthcare systems well tested technique (Methylene blue injection) can be effectively adapted in an overwhelmed, busy Eastern-European healthcare environment. (Other techniques, including pathology assistant are not affordable in this area.) Apart form testing diagnostic accuracy of the pathologist on specimens with and without methylene blue injection, the investigators would like to assess a potential survival benefit of the suspected improvement of staging effectivity.

Timing of the study:

Over a 20-month period of 2014 and 2015 two surgical centers in Hungary randomised their elective colorectal resection cases into interventional and control arms. Randomisation was performed with a 1:1 ratio at each site on 100-100 consecutive cases.

Further pathology work-up and reporting has been routinely performed without any specific effect on oncology follow-up or treatment. No specific data collection has been performed after the intervention.

This study aims to retrospectively select the 100-100 (total of 200) consecutive colorectal resection cases of the given time frame from the official hospital medical recording systems.

Pathology reports and other relevant patient clinical records will be collected and statistically assessed.

Ethical approval was requested and gained from the Medical Research Council, Hungary, for the retrospective analysis of patient data.

Statistical analysis:

Power analysis was performed to get the sufficient number of cases (200 cases in total).

Case Report Form The retrospectively included cases will be listed in a specific database on a safe medical server. Anthropometric, disease-specific, operation-specific and pathology report details will be extracted out of the official patient documentation system.

Patients will be included according to the known interventional interval and the operation type (elective colorectal resection). Cases in the database will be anonymized. No patient-identifying data will be recorded or given to the assessor of the study (statistician).

Inclusion criteria

• Elective operation.
• Colon or rectum resection performed.
• Malignant colorectal condition.
• Curative intent.

Exclusion criteria

• Acute surgery performed
• Final histology: benign
• No other pathologic method (apart form Methylene Blue injection) used to improve lymph node yield