Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04612738

Project Talk Trial: Engaging Underserved Communities in End-of-life Conversations

Compared to the general population, individuals from underserved communities are more likely to receive low quality end-of-life care and unwanted, costly and burdensome treatments due in part to a lack of advance care planning (ACP; the process of discussing wishes for end-of-life care with loved ones/clinicians and documenting them in advance directives).

This study will use existing, trusted, and respected social networks to evaluate two conversation-based tools intended to engage underserved individuals in discussions about end-of-life issue and motivate them to carry out ACP behaviors.

Through this study, investigators will learn how best to engage underserved populations in ACP so as to: 1) increase the likelihood that patients from underserved communities will receive high-quality end-of-life care; 2) address health disparities related to end-of-life treatments; and 3) reduce unnecessary suffering for patients and their families.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Pincham-Lincoln Community Center, Athens, Alabama, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The overall project goal of this 3-armed cluster, randomized control trial in underserved, diverse communities is to determine whether playing a serious conversation game called Hello is more effective than other advance care planning (ACP) approaches, or usual care (i.e., simply distributing an advance directive [AD]). The investigators will randomize 75 underserved communities across the US. The primary outcome is completion of a visually verified AD; secondary outcomes include performance of other ACP behaviors.

Many Black/African Americans and Latina/Latino patients are more likely to receive low quality end-of- life medical care than White individuals- in fact, they are 3 times more likely than white Americans to die after a lengthy intensive care unit stay. Advance care planning (ACP)- the process of discussing one's wishes with loved ones and clinicians, and then documenting them in an advance directive (AD)- can help reduce these health inequities by preventing costly/burdensome treatments that are unlikely to reduce suffering or improve quality of life. Though ~60% of Americans engage in ACP, <25% of underserved populations have done so- in large part due to distrust of the healthcare system/clinicians, and reluctance to discuss death and dying.

This study leverages underserved communities' existing, trusted social networks to deploy two community-based ACP interventions and study their mechanisms of action. By identifying which interventions increase engagement in ACP in underserved communities (and why), this project will help improve quality of end-of-life care, reduce unnecessary suffering, and end-of-life healthcare costs which conserves public health resources.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Community Hosts

  • Ability to recruit 20 individuals from underserved populations to attend a community event
  • Experience hosting a community event
  • Experience working with underserved populations
  • Participation in a series of mandatory live study-related web-based trainings
  • Completes a research site agreement

Research Participants

  • Adults over the age of 18 years old in underserved populations
  • Able to speak and read English and/or Spanish
  • Have not completed an AD within the previous 5 years
  • All participants regardless of health status
  • Individuals from the same household can enroll

Exclusion criteria

Community Hosts

  • Inability to recruit 20 individuals from underserved populations
  • Inexperience for hosting a community event
  • Inexperience working with underserved populations
  • Unable to attend a series of mandatory live study-related web-based trainings
  • Do not provide informed consent
  • Do not complete a research site agreement
  • Previously hosted a Hello project event

Research Participants

  • Anyone <18 years of age
  • Anyone not able to speak and read English and/or Spanish
  • Have significant difficulties with hearing or speaking difficulties by self-report
  • Completed an AD in the past 5 years
  • Do not provide informed consent

Treatment and study plan

Hello (serious game)

Behavioral

Commercially available, 'Hello' 32 is a serious game that consists of 32 questions prompting players to share their values, goals, and beliefs about end-of-life issues. The creators developed the questions following interviews with palliative care clinicians, hospice nurses, and funeral directors, and then revised them through a series focus groups with >100 patients/caregivers from diverse backgrounds.

The Conversation Project (CP) Starter Kit

Behavioral

The CP Starter Kit is one of the most widely promoted and disseminated ACP tools nationwide, is available for free online, and does not require a healthcare professional for use. Like 'Hello', it is intended to help individuals have end-of-life conversations with loved ones. The 11-page workbook has open- ended prompts to consider one's values and preferences for end-of-life care, who to talk with about one's wishes, and suggestions on how to do so. It also prompts participants to rank priorities on a 5-point scale (e.g., What are your concerns about treatment? 1= I'm worried I won't get enough care, 5= I'm worried I'll get overly aggressive care). The CP website provides resources for running a community event using the 'CP Starter Kit', including a 23-page manual, "Coaching the Conversation- A Guide to Facilitating Conversation Groups," with details on hosting a community-based program.

Table Topics (general conversation game)

Other

Table topics is a popular, commercially available conversation starter game that consists of question cards to prompt conversations (e.g., 'What do you love about your hometown?').

Primary outcomes

  1. Completion of a Self-reported or Visually Verified Advance Directive

    Time frame: 6 months post-intervention

    Study team confirms completion of a signed advance directive collected via self-report or visual verification

Secondary outcomes

  1. Completion of at least one Other Advance Care Planning (ACP) behavior

    Time frame: 6 months post-intervention

    Performance of at least one other ACP behaviors, since the event, such as self-reported ACP completion, discussions with loved ones, conversations with care providers, financial preparations (long-term health insurance, life insurance, disability insurance, etc.), nursing home/long-term care planning, hospice or palliative care planning, funeral arrangements, etc.

  2. Change in Advance Care Planning(ACP) Engagement Readiness 4-Item Survey

    Time frame: Baseline (Day of event participation); 6 months post-event participation

    This short-version survey measures stages of readiness to perform ACP.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Other

Collaborators

  • Hospice Foundation of America
  • University of Kentucky

Registry information

Official study title

Project Talk Trial: Engaging Underserved Communities in End-of-life Conversations: a Cluster, Randomized Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Nov 3, 2020
Registry last updated
Sep 9, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.