Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre"
Madrid, 28041, Spain
NCT Number: NCT04593407
EMR and ESD are both effective and safe and are associated with a very low risk of procedure related mortality when performed for colorectal laterally spreading lesions (LSL).
Some kind of LSLs have a low risk of submucosal invasive carcinoma (SMIC) or these foci are found in well demarcated areas of the tumor. This is the case of the non-granular flat elevated (LSN-NG-FE) and the LSLs-G mixed subtypes.
The investigators aim to assess if piecemeal EMR (the older technique) for LSLs-G mixed type > 30 mm and LSLs-NG FE type > 20 mm is not inferior to ESD (the new treatment) for the need of additional surgery in the mid-term.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year–85 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Madrid, 28041, Spain
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is curative for lesions with superficial submucosal invasive carcinoma (s-SMIC) and favourable histological features. The procedure is performed mainly for laterally spreading lesions (LSLs) and is the reference treatment for these neoplasms in Asian countries nowadays. LSLs can be granular (G) or non-granular (NG). Most LSLs-G homogenous type are superficial and can be resected by EMR because SMIC is often lacking. On the other hand, since LSLs-G mixed type > 20 - 30 mm have a higher prevalence of SMIC when compared with the homogenous subtype, Asian experts now recommend ESD for this kind of tumors. However, some years ago, EMR had been suggested for LSLs-G mixed type if the largest nodule was resected first and the histological assessment was done separately. The rationale for the latter approach is that the invasive component is usually found within the large nodule.
Conversely, the prevalence of SMIC is higher in LSLs-NG PD type, therefore, ESD is the preferred therapeutic intervention. In addition, LSLs-NG FE type have been associated with multifocal invasion in Japanese studies. However, in Western countries, the percentage of SMIC in LSLs-NG FE type > 20 mm seems much lower than previously described in Asian series. Thus, the investigators do not know if EMR might be enough to remove these tumours.
Furthermore, if the risk of s-SMIC is low, the recurrence rates for ESD in these kind of lesions (LSL-G mixed type > 30 mm and LSL-NG FE type > 20 mm) might be comparable to that of piecemeal EMR, in terms of curative resection (avoiding the need for surgery) in the mid-term. When performing an EMR, recurrences are more frequent, but they are largely inconsequential because it is usually unifocal, diminutive and easily can be managed endoscopically on subsequent sessions.
In order to clarify the controversial issue of performing colorectal ESD in Western countries, the investigators aim to assess if piecemeal EMR (the older technique) for LSLs-G mixed type > 30 mm and LSLs-NG FE type > 20 mm is not inferior to ESD (the new treatment) for the need of additional surgery in the mid-term.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an endoscopic resection technique that allows the removal of large colorectal lesions using a conventional "lift-and-cut" procedure or an underwater technique
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an endoscopic procedure that allows dissection of larger colorectal lesions in one piece using endoknives.
The procedure is technically more difficult, much more time-consuming than EMR, mandates multiday hospital admission and has an increased risk of perforation.
Time frame: Month 18
Compare between two groups.
Time frame: Month 1
Compare between two groups
Time frame: Month 1
Compare between two groups
Time frame: Month 1
Compare between two groups
Time frame: Month 18
Compare between two groups
Time frame: Month 1
Compare between two groups
Time frame: Month 1 and 18
Compare between two groups
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify MeJosé Carlos Marín Gabriel
Other
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Laterally Spreading Lesions Non Granular-Flat Elevated Type (LSL-NG-FE) ≥ 20 mm and LSLs-Granular Mixed Type ≥ 30 mm. A Randomized, Non-inferiority Trial.
Acronym: intERsection
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07213609
Colonic Diseases, Colonic Neoplasms
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01671592
Carcinoma, Colonic Diseases
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03885817
Colonic Diseases, Colorectal Neoplasms
Ålesund, Norway
View Trial DetailsNCT05358249
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details