University of Illinois Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
NCT Number: NCT04506151
Up to 40% of adults with type 1 diabetes have insufficient sleep which is associated with negative health consequences including poor blood glucose control and greater diabetes complications. In this study, a sleep intervention (Sleep-Opt) that uses wearable sleep tracking technology, telephone coaching and informational content designed to improve sleep and glycemic control in working-age adults with type 1 diabetes. Sleep-Opt could lead to reduced development of diabetes complications and improve quality of life for adults with type 1 diabetes.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Despite improvements in treatment regimens and technology, less than 20% of adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) achieve glycemic targets. Sleep is increasingly recognized as a potentially modifiable target for improving glycemic control. Diabetes distress, poor self-management behaviors, and reduced quality of life (QoL) have also been linked to sleep variability and insufficient sleep duration. The American Diabetes Association Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes incorporated sleep as an important component of the medical evaluation in persons with diabetes. However, no specific recommendation was given as to how to improve sleep. A significant gap of knowledge exists regarding the effects of sleep optimization on glycemic control in T1D. The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of a T1D-specific sleep optimization intervention (Sleep-Opt) on the primary outcomes of sleep variability, sleep duration and glycemic control (A1C); other glycemic parameters (glycemic variability, time in range), diabetes distress, self-management behavior, QoL, and other patient reported outcomes in working-age adults with T1D and habitual increased sleep variability or short sleep duration. To achieve these aims, a randomized controlled trial is planned in 120 working age adults (18 to 65 years) with T1D. Participants will be screened for habitual sleep variability (> 1 hour/week) or insufficient sleep duration (< 6.5 hours per night). Eligible subjects will be randomized to the Sleep-Opt group or healthy living attention control group for twelve weeks. A one-week run-in period is planned, with baseline measures of sleep by actigraphy (sleep variability and duration), glycemia (A1C and related glycemic measures: glycemic variability and time in range using continuous glucose monitoring), and other secondary outcomes: diabetes distress, self-management behaviors, quality of life and additional patient-reported outcomes. Sleep-Opt is a technology-assisted behavioral sleep intervention that this study team developed that leverages the rapidly increasing public interest in sleep tracking by consumers (+500% in 3 years). The behavioral intervention employs four elements: a wearable sleep tracker, didactic content, an interactive smartphone application, and brief telephone counseling. The attention control group will participate in a healthy living information program. At midpoint (Week 6) completion (Week 12) and post-program (Week 24), baseline measures will be repeated to determine differences between the two groups and sustainability of the intervention.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
12-week behavioral intervention
Healthy Living
Time frame: Week 6
Standard deviation total sleep time for one week
Time frame: Week 12
Standard deviation total sleep time for one week
Time frame: Week 24
Standard deviation total sleep time for one week
Time frame: Weeks 6
total sleep time minutes
Time frame: Week 12
total sleep time in minutes
Time frame: Week 24
total sleep time in minutes
Time frame: Week 6
Hemoglobin A1C week 6, %
Time frame: Week 12
HbA1c blood test
Time frame: Week 24
HbA1c blood test
Time frame: Week 6
Type 1 Diabetes Distress Scale measures diabetes distress. Item mean scores calculated (sum of scores/number of items) ranges from 1-6 Higher scores indicated greater distress Unit of measure = units on a scale
Time frame: Week 12
Type 1 Diabetes Distress Scale measures diabetes distress. Item mean scores calculated (sum of scores/number of items) ranges from 1-6 Higher scores indicated greater distress Unit of measure = units on a scale
Time frame: Week 24
Type 1 Diabetes Distress Scale measures diabetes distress. Item mean scores calculated (sum of scores/number of items) ranges from 1-6 Higher scores indicated greater distress Unit of measure = units on a scale
Time frame: Week 6
Diabetes Self Management Questionnaire-R (DSMQ-R) measures diabetes self-management Item mean scores calculated (sum of scores/maximum possible sum of items * 10). Ranges from 0-10. Higher numbers indicate better self-management behavior Unit of measure = units on a scale
Time frame: Week 12
Diabetes Self Management Questionnaire-R (DSMQ-R) measures diabetes self-management Item mean scores calculated (sum of scores/maximum possible sum of items * 10). Scores ranges from 0-10. Higher numbers indicate better self-management behavior Unit of measure = units on a scale
Time frame: Week 24
Diabetes Self Management Questionnaire-R (DSMQ-R) measures diabetes self-management Item mean scores calculated (sum of scores/maximum possible sum of items * 10). Ranges from 0-10. Higher numbers indicate better self-management behavior Unit of measure = units on a scale
Time frame: Week 6
Diabetes Quality of Life scale measures quality of life Total quality of life score calculated as follows: (Raw total score - lowest possible score)/raw score range * 100. Scores range from 0-100.
Scores are reverse coded so that higher numbers indicate better quality of life.
Unit of measure = units on a scale
Time frame: Week 12
Diabetes Quality of Life scale measures quality of life Total quality of life score calculated as follows: (Raw total score - lowest possible score)/raw score range * 100. Scores range from 0-100.
Scores are reverse coded so that higher numbers indicate better quality of life.
Unit of measure = units on a scale.
Time frame: Week 24
Diabetes Quality of Life scale measures quality of life Total quality of life score calculated as follows: (Raw total score - lowest possible score)/raw score range * 100. Scores range from 0-100.
Scores are reverse coded so that higher numbers indicate better quality of life.
Unit of measure = units on a scale.
Time frame: Week 6
Patient Reported Outcomes Measure (PROMIS) fatigue scale score measures fatigue.
The total score was converted to T-scores (with T-scores, 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10). Mean T-scores were calculated. Higher scores reflect greater fatigue.
Time frame: Week 12
Patient Reported Outcomes Measure (PROMIS) fatigue scale score measures fatigue.
The total score was converted to T-scores (with T-scores, 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10). Mean T-scores were calculated. Higher scores reflect greater fatigue.
Time frame: Week 24
Patient Reported Outcomes Measure (PROMIS) fatigue scale score measures fatigue.
The total score was converted to T-scores (with T-scores, 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10). Mean T-scores were calculated. Higher scores reflect greater fatigue.
Time frame: Week 6
Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) measures depressive mood. Total summed score ranges from 0-60. Higher scores indicate greater depressive mood. Unit of measure = units on a scale.
Time frame: Week 12
Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) measures depressive mood. Total summed score ranges from 0-60. Higher scores indicate greater depressive mood. Unit of measure = units on a scale.
Time frame: Week 24
Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) measures depressive mood. Total summed score ranges from 0-60. Higher scores indicate greater depressive mood. Unit of measure = units on a scale.
Time frame: Week 6
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) measures subjective sleep quality. Total summed score ranges 0-21. Higher score reflects poorer sleep quality. Unit of measure = units on a scale.
Time frame: Week 12
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) measures subjective sleep quality. Total summed score ranges 0-21. Higher score reflects poorer sleep quality. Unit of measure = units on a scale.
Time frame: Week 24
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) measures subjective sleep quality. Total summed score ranges 0-21. Higher score reflects poorer sleep quality. Unit of measure = units on a scale.
Time frame: Week 6
Coefficient of variation (CV%), continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-derived glucose standard deviation (SD) divided by the mean and multiplied by 100.
Time frame: Week 12
Coefficient of variation (CV%), continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-derived glucose standard deviation (SD) divided by the mean and multiplied by 100.
Time frame: Week 24
Coefficient of variation (CV%), continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-derived glucose standard deviation (SD) divided by the mean and multiplied by 100.
Time frame: Week 6
Percent of time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-derived glucose is between 70-180 mg/dL.
Time frame: Week 12
Percent of time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-derived glucose is between 70-180 mg/dL.
Time frame: Week 24
Percent of time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-derived glucose is between 70-180 mg/dL.
Time frame: week 12
Mediation tests of the sleep intervention effect on A1C that is due to the change in sleep duration. It is the product of parameter estimates testing the effect of the intervention on sleep duration and the mediating effect of the change in sleep duration on A1C. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) models were used.
Time frame: Week 12
Results are not reported by treatment arm. This analysis tests the sleep intervention effect on A1C that is mediated by the change in sleep variability. The values reported are the product of parameter estimates testing the effect of the intervention on sleep variability and the effect of the change in sleep variability on A1C. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) models were used.
University of Illinois at Chicago
Other
Acronym: SOPT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07787754
Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT04646473
Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
Hanover, New Hampshire, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02438189
Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
Stanford, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05488119
Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
Stanford, California, United States
View Trial Details