Multi-level intervention to increase CRC screening
BehavioralIntervention for the community, providers, patients, clinics and systems
NCT Number: NCT04427527
This project aims to implement a multi-level group randomized trial, delayed intervention that includes components targeting clinics, providers, patients, and the community to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, follow-up, and referral-to-care among patients age 50-74 in 12 counties in Appalachian Kentucky and Ohio. The 12 counties will be assigned to one of two study groups (early vs. delayed) and outcome measures (rate of CRC screening) will be obtained from clinic-level electronic health record data and a county-level behavioral assessment telephone survey. The hypothesis for the project is that the multi-level intervention will increase the clinic and county level CRC screening rates.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me50 year–74 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
.no exclusions based on gender, race or ethnicity
Intervention for the community, providers, patients, clinics and systems
Time frame: Y1 Follow-up
This is the Y1 follow-up clinic-reported aggregated CRC screening rate for eligible patients age 50-74 at the clinic-level for Pair 2 and Pair 3 early and delayed clinics (n=8). Pair 1 clinics (n=4) were excluded. Percentages reported are based on aggregated numerator (total # of patients age 50-74 screened for CRC at Pair 2 and 3 early/delayed clinics)/aggregated denominator (total # of patients age 50-74 eligible for CRC screening at Pair 2 and 3 early/delayed clinics).
Time frame: Y2 Follow-up
This is the Y2 follow-up clinic-reported aggregated CRC screening rate for eligible patients age 50-74 at the clinic-level for Pair 2 and Pair 3 early and delayed clinics (n=8). Pair 1 clinics (n=4) were excluded. Percentages reported are based on aggregated numerator (total # of patients age 50-74 screened for CRC at Pair 2 and 3 early/delayed clinics)/aggregated denominator (total # of patients age 50-74 eligible for CRC screening at Pair 2 and 3 early/delayed clinics).
Time frame: Y0 Baseline
This is the baseline clinic-reported aggregated CRC screening rate for eligible patients age 50-74 at the clinic-level for Pair 2 and Pair 3 early and delayed clinics (n=8). Pair 1 clinics (n=4) were excluded. Percentages reported are based on aggregated numerator (total # of patients age 50-74 screened for CRC at Pair 2 and 3 early/delayed clinics)/aggregated denominator (total # of patients age 50-74 eligible for CRC screening at Pair 2 and 3 early/delayed clinics).
Time frame: Y0 Baseline
Weighted estimates of clinic-level CRC screening status (within/not within CRC Screening Guidelines) among adults aged 50-74 were calculated from survey data collected in Pair 2 and Pair 3 counties. Estimates were weighted using balancing weights and county/state-level weighting factors to account for sampling design and oversampling. Reported values are weighted mean estimates with 95% confidence intervals and are not participant-level percentages.
Time frame: Y2 Follow-up
Weighted county-level estimates of CRC screening within screen guidelines among adults age 50-74. Estimates were calculated using balancing weights to account for age/sex representation within counties and county/state weighting factors to account for oversampling. Therefore, weighted estimates and confidence intervals are not restricted to the range 0-100 and should not be interpreted as raw percentages of survey participants.
Time frame: Y1 Follow-up
Weighted county-level estimates of CRC screening within screen guidelines among adults age 50-74. Estimates were calculated using balancing weights to account for age/sex representation within counties and county/state weighting factors to account for oversampling. Therefore, weighted estimates and confidence intervals are not restricted to the range 0-100 and should not be interpreted as raw percentages of survey participants.
Mark Dignan, PhD
Other
Accelerating Colorectal Cancer Screening Through Implementation Science in Appalachia (ACCSIS)
Acronym: ACCSIS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06790355
Colonic Diseases, Colorectal Cancer
Fuzhou, Fujian, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05391321
Colonic Diseases, Colorectal Cancer
Limoges, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06212817
Colonic Diseases, Colorectal Cancer
Arnhem, Gelderland, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT06236321
Colonic Diseases, Colorectal Cancer
Aberdeen, United Kingdom
View Trial Details