Ribociclib
DrugRibociclib Dose Level 0 (starting dose) 200mg QD Dose Level 1A 400mg QD on Days 8-28 Dose Level 1B 200mg QD Dose Level 2 400mg QD on Days 8-28
NCT Number: NCT04315233
This is an open-label, multi-center, phase I study designed to assess the maximum tolerated dose of ribociclib and belinostat in combination. The trial will open with a dose escalation followed by an expansion cohort at the identified dose. Dose escalation will be open to the enrollment of patients diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer or ovarian cancer. Dose expansion will only be open to patients diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
We hypothesize that ribociclib plus belinostat will be a well-tolerated and demonstrate activity in women with metastatic triple-negative breast or recurrent ovarian cancers.
This trial combines two targeted agents, a CDK inhibitor and a lysine deacetylase (DAC) inhibitor for use as the first targeted treatment for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. This in itself would be a leap forward for women who currently endure sequential treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapies. However, we will also be using samples from this trial in NIH-funded research on clonal evolution and geographic heterogeneity in breast cancer. Blockade of CDK4/6 and of lysine deacetylases (DAC) are both promising treatments for breast cancer. DAC inhibitors have been shown to have single-agent activity against triple-negative breast cancer in vivo, possibly through decreasing EMT, decreasing migration, and decreasing metastasis [6, 7] CDK4/6 inhibitor monotherapy causes cell cycle arrest and tumor regression in triple-negative breast cancer models. [8, 9] However, neither approach has been successfully translated into clinical use as a monotherapy.
There are several lines of evidence demonstrating that inhibiting DAC increases the sensitivity of breast cancer to CDK4/6 inhibition. Recently, we showed that inhibitors of cell cycle progression, including CDKN1A, CDKN1C, CDKN2B, and CDKN2D, are increased by DAC inhibition in breast cancer cell lines, including triple-negative cell lines. [10] Others have shown cell cycle arrest by DAC inhibitors due to increases in p21 or decreases in CDK2 and cyclin A. [11-13] We also see an increase in RB1 expression in breast cancer cell lines. In the TCGA breast cancer analysis, RB1 was frequently down-regulated but not mutated or lost in triple-negative breast cancer. [14] Therefore, we hypothesized that DAC inhibition would increase the sensitivity of breast cancer to CDK4/6 inhibition. We first tested this hypothesis in a small panel of cell lines. We showed and published that all showed synergy between a CDK4/6 inhibitor (PD-0322991) and DAC inhibitors. [10] Since then, we have tested the combination of the DAC inhibitor vorinostat and the CDK4/6 inhibitor PD-322991 in a larger panel of cell lines and have shown at least additivity in most triple-negative cell lines. Indeed, it seems that those cancers least sensitive to CDK4/6 inhibition may benefit the most from co-treatment with a DAC inhibitor.
Recently, we investigated ribociclib and belinostat in six triple-negative breast cancer cell lines. All 6 cell lines showed growth inhibition with belinostat and panobinostat. Synergy was seen in four of the six cell lines at multiple doses.
We have also recently completed an analysis on a window of opportunity trial of the DAC inhibitor high-dose valproic acid, in breast cancer.[15] In that study, women were treated with valproic acid for one week before definitive therapy began. Fifty percent of women with triple-negative breast cancers had a significant decrease in Ki-67 with one week of valproic acid, providing proof of principle biologic activity of DAC inhibition in triple-negative breast cancer. (By contrast, no HER2 positive tumor had a decrease in Ki-67 with valproic acid treatment.) Given the genomic similarities between serous ovarian cancer and triple-negative breast cancer seen in the TCGA and pan-cancer analyses [16], we have chosen to include ovarian cancers in the dose-escalation component to increase accrual rate but not in the dose-expansion.
Neither CDK4/6 inhibition nor DAC inhibition have a well-defined predictive biomarker to determine which cancers will respond and which will not. Because of the complex genomic effects of inhibition of the 11 DACs and the multiple targets of DACs, including histones, p53, etc, it is unlikely that a single gene or protein alteration will predict sensitivity. We have published a method for predicting sensitivity to targeted drugs using genome-wide gene expression analysis. [17] After demonstrating proof of principle by accurately predicting sensitivity to vemurafenib, we developed a genomic biomarker for the DAC inhibitor valproic acid. We then validated that this biomarker predicted sensitivity in vitro and in vivo. In the window of opportunity discussed above, our genomic signature had an AUC of 0.66 for predicting decreased Ki-67 with one week of treatment with valproic acid. We will develop a similar multi-gene gene expression based biomarker for the combination of ribociclib and belinostat.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
For dose escalation cohorts only:
OR:
For dose expansion cohort only:
For all patients:
----AST(SGOT)/ALT(SGPT) ≤ 5 × institutional ULN for patients with liver metastasis.
Exclusion criteria
--Note: Therapy with heparin, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), an oral factor Xa inhibitor, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, or fondaparinux is allowed.
--Note: Patients on effective anti-retroviral therapy with an undetectable viral load within 6 months of the anticipated start of treatment are eligible for this trial.
--Note: Patients with an undetectable HBV viral load on appropriate suppressive therapy are eligible. Patients with an undetectable HCV viral load are eligible.
Ribociclib Dose Level 0 (starting dose) 200mg QD Dose Level 1A 400mg QD on Days 8-28 Dose Level 1B 200mg QD Dose Level 2 400mg QD on Days 8-28
Belinostat Dose Level 0 (starting dose) 600mg/m2 daily for 5 days Dose Level 1A 600mg/m2 daily for 5 days Dose Level 1B 1000mg/m2 daily for 5 days Dose Level 2 1000mg/m2 daily for 5 days
*Administration on 5 consecutive days is preferred. Administration within 7 days allowed as needed to accommodate holidays and infusion schedules.
Time frame: up to 28 days after initiation of study treatment
This outcome measure will report the count of participants who experienced DLTs during the DLT period. The DLT period is defined as the first cycle of treatment (from cycle one day one dosing to cycle two day 1). Patients will be assessed over this period for the occurrence of adverse events, per CTCAE v5.0.
Any of the following events occurring within the defined DLT period which are attributable (possibly, probably, or definitely related) to any or all agents in the combination will be classified as a DLT:
Time frame: up to 5 months from the start of study treatment
To assess the safety of ribociclib and belinostat in combination.
This outcome measure will report the count of participants who experienced an Grade 3 or higher Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) related to ribociclib and belinostat. Events with a Definite, Probable, or Possible attribution were considered attributed to ribociclib and belinostatin.
Time frame: up to 4 months
To assess the efficacy in the study population. Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from study drug initiation to the time of documented disease progression (as assessed by RECIST 1.1) or death from any cause.
Time frame: up to 4 months
To assess the efficacy in the study population. Objective response rate is defined as the proportion of patients achieving CR (Complete Response) or PR (Partial Response), as assessed by RECIST 1.1 while on study treatment. CR was defined as a the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions. PR was defined as a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD, for a minimum of four weeks.
University of Utah
Other
A Phase I/Ib Trial of the CDK4/6 Antagonist Ribociclib And The HDAC Inhibitor Belinostat In Patients With Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer And Recurrent Ovarian Cancer With Response Prediction By Genomics (CHARGE)
Acronym: CHARGE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05143970
Adnexal Diseases, Advanced Solid Tumor
Marseille, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06533332
Adnexal Diseases, Advanced Solid Tumor
Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT05708703
Adnexal Diseases, Breast Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05796973
Adenocarcinoma, Adnexal Diseases
Tampere, Länsi-Suomi, Finland
View Trial Details