Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04195217

" Application of Art Therapy in Oncology: Evaluation of the Symptomatic of Patients Suffering From a Cancerous Disease"

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of art-therapeutic management on a patient with cancer, during chemotherapy treatment, on the reduction of physical or psychological symptoms.

Art therapy is a non-drug approach that can help some patients cope with the consequences of cancer beyond the care provided.

The common psychosocial difficulties experienced by cancer patients are pain, fatigue, depression, anxiety, drowsiness. In sum, the well-being and quality of life of the patient throughout the illness.

The main objective is to evaluate the impact of art therapy, as a supportive care, on improving the well-being felt after a session of cancer treatments (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, ...), during 6 sessions( around 24 days between 2 sessions) , at patients with a cancer pathology using two questionnaires, one on the evaluation of symptoms (ESAS), the other on the quality of life (FACT-G).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Perigueux Hospital Center

Périgueux, Dordogne, 24000, France

About this study

Patients will be randomized into the following groups:

  • Group 1: Art therapy as supportive care in 6 consecutive sessions of cancer treatments with or without additional supportive care
  • Group 2: 6 consecutive sessions of cancer treatments with or without additional supportive care.

Symptom assessment with the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) is done before and after each treatment session for each patient.

The FACT-G questionnaire on the quality of life at the beginning and the end of the care for the two groups (group benefiting from the art-therapy and group not benefiting from the art-therapy) and a questionnaire on the contribution of art therapy, at the end of care, for the participants of the art-therapy group.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • aged over 18
  • patient cared for on Onco-hematology day with a cancerous pathology
  • consent of the patient
  • patient affiliated to social Security

Exclusion criteria

  • patient minor
  • patient under legal protection
  • patient with too much impairment of vital and / or cognitive functions to participate and understand the study
  • patient whose predictable management is less than the follow-up period (6 sessions),
  • patient who has already participated in an art therapy session during their lifetime

Treatment and study plan

Art Therapy

Behavioral

When the patient is placed in a treatment room, a nurse or the ARC proposes to complete the questionnaires corresponding to his visit in accordance with the diagram of the investigations, then retrieve the questionnaire and forward it to the art therapist Then, the art therapist intervenes ans propose different Artistic supports : paint, watercolor pencils, pastels, pencils, clay , origami, music in as an accompaniment to artistic creation.

The workshop runs from 30 minutes to 2:30. It can be cut by doctors and nurses interventions during medical care. The limit of care is set at 2:30 for reasons of concentration of the patient, organization of the service but the patient is an actor of his care, and chooses when the session ends.

At the end of intervention, the nurse or the ARC proposes at patient to complete the end questionnaire. Theses last are retrieve it and to forward it to the art therapist.

Primary outcomes

  1. Average, Over the 6 Treatment Sessions, of the Change in the ESAS 'Well-being" Assessed Before and After Each Treatment Session.

    Time frame: Before and after each chimotherapy session - 6 sessions between 6 weeks to 6 months

    The aim is to evaluate the impact of art therapy as a supportive care on the improvement of the well-being felt after a session of cancer treatments (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, ...), during 6 sessions, in patients having a cancerous pathology.

    The primary endpoint is the 6-session average of the difference between the ESAS score associated with the patient's well-being symptom (a symptom of "feeling good" on the ESAS assessment), obtained before and after the treatment session.

    The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (SESA) is a 9-item symptom rating scale. The quote goes from 0 to 10. A score close to zero means a better result.

    Well-being (0=well, 10=bad)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Average Over the 6 Treatment Sessions of the Difference Between ESAS Scores for Each One of the Other Symptoms, Measured Before and After Each Treatment Session

    Time frame: Before and after each chemotherapy session - 6 sessions between 6 weeks to 6 months

    For each of the other symptoms of the ESAS scale, : pain, fatigue, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, lack of appetite, difficulty breathing, the average over 6 treatment sessions, the difference between the ESAS score associated with the symptom studied, obtained before and after each treatment session.

    The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (SESA) is a 9-item symptom rating scale. The quote goes from 0 to 10. For symptoms assessed within the 1st secondary endpoint, the ESAS score correlates positively to symptom intensity.

  2. Difference in ESAS Scores for Each Symptom Between the First Treatment Session and the Last (6th) Session.

    Time frame: 6 sessions between 6 weeks to 6 months

    To determine the impact of the 6 sessions of art therapy as supportive care to cancer treatments on the evolution of symptoms, by the ESAS scale, before the first session of art therapy, and after the last session (6th) The secondary judgment criterion 2 corresponds, for each of the ESAS symptoms, to the difference in ESAS score associated with the symptom studied, before the first and the last treatment session (6th).

    The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (SESA) is a 9-item symptom rating scale. The quote goes from 0 to 10. Symptom intensity (0-10) and for well-being a score close to zero means a better result.

  3. Difference in the Total FACT-G Quality-of-life Score Between the First Session and the End of the 6 Anticancer Treatment Sessions.

    Time frame: 6 sessions between 6 weeks to 6 months

    Secondary endpoint 3 is the difference in total FACT-G quality of life score score between inclusion and the end of the 6 sessions of cancer treatment.

    This questionnaire contains 27 items constructed on a Likert scale with 5 coded response modes: 0 "Not at all" / 1 "A little" / 2 "Moderately" / 3 "A lot" / 4 "Enormously".

    A score is calculated by dimension ( physical, social, emotional and functional). These scores range from 0 to 28 where 0 represents a low level of well-being and 28 a high level of well-being. This score corresponds to the sum of the raw scores obtained for each dimension, and varies from 0 (low level) to 108 (good level of general well-being).

    Score global FACT-G (0-108)

  4. Participants' Satisfaction With Art Therapy as Well as Their Subjective Perception of the Effects Experienced During and After the Sessions

    Time frame: End of 6 session between 6 weeks to 6 months

    Questionnaire (created by the principal investigator) designed to evaluate patient satisfaction, after 6 sessions of art therapy, on this type of therapy as supportive treatment in onco-therapy. It is composed of 5 questions relating to the feeling of art therapy sessions by the patient. They are rated from 0 to 5 (a better score is close to 5) in relation The secondary endpoint 4 is the satisfaction questionnaire for art therapy, performed only in patients in the therapy group by art.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier de Perigueux

Other

Collaborators

  • Centre Hospitalier de PAU

Registry information

Acronym: ARONCO

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Dec 11, 2019
Registry last updated
Aug 28, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.