Phonological Awareness
BehavioralEarobics training
NCT Number: NCT03582566
This study aims to determine the effectiveness of computer games to improve language and literacy outcomes for children who have hearing loss. Children will be assigned to one of four conditions: phonological awareness training, working memory training, phonological awareness + working memory training, or active control.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me5 year–7 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, United States
Both phonological awareness and working memory are known to be important for children's language and literacy learning. Though there are computer games that claim to improve phonological awareness and working memory, it is unknown if these games will improve language and literacy skills for children who have hearing loss.
The investigators will first determine if the games are effective for improving language and phonological awareness in children with hearing loss relative to an active control condition. Secondly, the investigators will determine if gains in phonological awareness and working memory translate into gains in language and literacy skills relative to active control.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Earobics training
Cogmed training
Earobics + Cogmed training
Spashmath
Time frame: Baseline, post-intervention (8 weeks post-baseline), 6 months post-baseline
Change in a standardized test of phonological awareness. Scores are from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better performance.
Time frame: Baseline, post-intervention (8 weeks post-baseline), 6 months post-baseline
Change in a standardized test of phonological awareness. Scores are from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better performance.
Time frame: Baseline, post-intervention (8 weeks post-baseline), 6 months post-baseline
Change in a standardized test of verbal working memory
Time frame: Baseline, post-intervention (8 weeks post-baseline), 6 months post-baseline
Change in a standardized test of language and literacy skills. Measures performance on expressive and receptive language, and reading and writing abilities. Scores are age-adjusted.
Time frame: Baseline, post-intervention (8 weeks post-baseline), 6 months post-baseline
Change in a standardized test of vocabulary knowledge. Scores are from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better performance.
Time frame: Baseline, post-intervention (8 weeks post-baseline), 6 months post-baseline
Change in a standardized test of early literacy skills. Scores are from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better performance.
Florida State University
Other
Training-Induced Language and Literacy Improvement in Children With Cochlear Implants
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04427033
Ear Diseases, Hearing Disorders
Innsbruck, Austria
View Trial DetailsNCT06106373
Ear Diseases, Hearing Disorders
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06560918
Ear Diseases, Hearing Disorders
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05973669
Cochlear Implant, Cochlear Implant Recipients
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
View Trial Details