Early Highly Effective Therapies Group
DrugHighly Effective MS Therapy group of medications
Other names: Lemtrada (alemtuzumab), Ocrevus (ocrelizumab), Tysabri (natalizumab), Rituxan (rituximab), Kesimpta (ofatumumab), Briumvi (ublituximab)
NCT Number: NCT03535298
The DELIVER-MS study seeks to answer the question: Does early treatment with highly effective DMT improve the prognosis for people with MS? This is an area of significant controversy and no data currently exist to guide treatment choices for patients and clinicians. The study results will help guide overall treatment philosophy and will be applicable not only to a wide range of existing therapies but also to new therapies, meeting a significant unmet need in patient decision making and aiding the decision for medication approval by third parties.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, England, United Kingdom
DELIVER-MS is a multi-center pragmatic comparative effectiveness randomized clinical trial with additional-parallel observational cohort. It aims to enroll up to 400 individuals newly diagnosed with RRMS and randomize them 1:1 to Early Highly Effective (EHT) or Escalation (ESC) treatment paradigms, based on the use of different disease modifying therapies (DMT) as first-line therapy. EHT approach to DMT is defined as use of one of five monoclonal antibodies (alemtuzumab, natalizumab, rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, ublituximab) as first-line therapy. ESC approach is defined as initiating any other approved MS DMT as first-line therapy, then escalating to a more effective therapy upon disease activity. Once randomized, the Neurologist and Participant decide which DMT within the arm is most appropriate. After the initial DMT is initiated, if a DMT change is needed, the second-line therapy may be chosen from either arm, regardless of randomization. The randomization only applies to the initial DMT choice.
Up to 400 individuals who do are not amenable to randomization or who agree to randomization but are not approved for coverage for a medication in the arm to which they were randomized will enter the Observational Arm. In the Observational Arm, the DMT chosen is from any approved DMT for MS and is chosen by the Neurologist and participant.
All study procedures throughout are identical between the randomized and observation alarm, except for the randomization.
The primary objective for the initial 36 months of the study is normalized whole brain volume loss, measured using MRI from baseline to Month 36. The primary objective for the long term extension of the study (Months 48-108) is the EDSS+, a composite measure of clinical disability based on the EDSS and MSFC.
The study is performed primarily in tertiary MS Centers in the US and UK.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Highly Effective MS Therapy group of medications
Other names: Lemtrada (alemtuzumab), Ocrevus (ocrelizumab), Tysabri (natalizumab), Rituxan (rituximab), Kesimpta (ofatumumab), Briumvi (ublituximab)
Escalation MS Therapy group of medications
Other names: Betaseron (beta interferon), Copaxone (glatiramer acetate), Aubagio (teriflunomide), Extavia (beta interferon), Gilenya (fingolimod), Glatopa (glatiramer acetate), Plegridy (beta interferon), Rebif (beta interferon), Tecfidera (dimethyl fumarate), Avonex (beta interferon), Mavenclad (cladribine), Mayzent (siponimod), Vumerity (diroximel fumarate), Zeposia (ozanimod), Bafiertam (monomethyl fumarate), Ponvory (ponesimod)
Time frame: Baseline to 36 months
To determine whether an EHT approach to DMT, defined as use of one of four monoclonal antibodies (alemtuzumab, natalizumab, rituximab, or ocrelizumab) as first-line therapy, is more effective than an escalation of treatment approach in reducing normalized whole brain volume loss measured using MRI in PwRRMS from Baseline to Month 36.
Time frame: 48 months to 108 months
To determine whether an EHT approach to DMT, defined as use of one of six monoclonal antibodies (alemtuzumab, natalizumab, rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, ublituximab) as first-line therapy, is more effective than an escalation of treatment approach in reducing time to reach a multidimensional composite comprised of EDSS+ worsening. EDSS+ worsening will be defined as worsening on ⩾ 1 of the 3 components: EDSS, 9HPT, or T25FW, which is confirmed at another visit after 12 months. EDSS worsening will be defined as a ⩾1.0-point increase from a baseline score of ⩽5.5 or a ⩾0.5-point increase from a baseline score of ⩾6.0. T25FW and 9HPT worsening will be defined as ⩾20% worsening from baseline.
Time frame: Month 6 to month 36
To determine whether an EHT approach to DMT, defined as use of one of four monoclonal antibodies (alemtuzumab, natalizumab, rituximab, or ocrelizumab) as first-line therapy, is more effective than an escalation of treatment approach in reducing normalized whole brain volume loss measured using MRI in PwRRMS from Month 6 to Month 36.
Time frame: Baseline to 36 months
Proportion of participants with a multidimensional composite comprised of EDSS progression (>1.5 points for those with EDSS of 0 at Baseline, ≥1.0 for those with EDSS of 0.5-5.0 at Baseline, and >0.5 points for those with EDSS above 5.0 at Baseline), 20% change in MSFC-4 subcomponents (T25FW, 9HPT), 10% in SDMT or, 1 line change in LCLA confirmed over 12 months.
Time frame: Baseline to 36 months
Change in MSIS-29 responses from participants
Time frame: Baseline to 36 months
11 subscales, each is scored separately, there is no composite score
Physical Domains:
Upper Extremity Function (Fine Motor, ADL):
Higher scores indicate: Better Functioning
Lower Extremity Function (Mobility):
Higher scores indicate: Better Functioning
Fatigue:
Higher scores indicate: Worse Functioning
Sleep Disturbance:
Higher scores indicate: Worse Functioning
Mental Domains:
Cognition Function:
Higher scores indicate: Better Functioning
Stigma:
Higher scores indicate: Worse Functioning
Anxiety:
Higher scores indicate: Worse Functioning
Depression:
Higher scores indicate: Worse Functioning
Positive Affect and Well -being:
Higher scores indicate: Better Functioning
Social Domains:
Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities:
Higher scores indicate: Better Functioning
Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities:
Higher scores indicate: Better Functioning
Time frame: 48 months to 108 months
To determine the efficacy of an EHT approach as compared to an escalation approach as reflected by the following:
Time frame: 48 months to 108 months
To determine the efficacy of an EHT approach as compared to an escalation approach as reflected in the following patient-reported outcomes:
Time frame: 48 months to 108 months
To determine the safety of an EHT approach as compared to an escalation approach as reflected in the following:
The Cleveland Clinic
Other
Determining the Effectiveness of earLy Intensive Versus Escalation Approaches for the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
Acronym: DELIVER-MS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03500328
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05519553
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Nantes, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05296161
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT06345157
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Ancona, AN, Italy
View Trial Details