Pembrolizumab
Drug3 weekly cycles of Pembrolizumab administered by IV
NCT Number: NCT03425565
PEACOCC is a multi-centre, single arm, single stage phase II trial. The overall aim is to determine whether treatment with pembrolizumab is effective in patients with advanced clear cell gynaecological cancer.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Phase 2
Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Main Inclusion Criteria:
Main Exclusion Criteria:
3 weekly cycles of Pembrolizumab administered by IV
Time frame: 12 weeks
The proportion of progression-free participants is defined as the number of participants alive with complete or partial response or stable disease maintained at 12 weeks (as assessed by the site radiologist and/or investigator, using RECIST v1.1) divided by the number of participants in the analysis population. Only participants with tumour assessment at or beyond 12 weeks were considered progression-free. All eligible participants who received at least one cycle of pembrolizumab were included in the analysis population. Any patient found to be ineligible will be excluded and replaced.
Time frame: Time from start of trial treatment to progression or death from any cause (whichever came first).
All deaths were included, whether they occurred on study or following treatment discontinuation. For participants who had not died or progressed, progression-free survival were censored at the date of last contact.
Time frame: Time from diagnosis of first progression during or after their initial pembrolizumab therapy to second progression or death from any cause (whichever came first), during or after their retreatment pembrolizumab.
Time to second disease progression refers to progression in participants re-treated on trial after their first progression. All deaths are included, whether they occur during the re-treatment period or following treatment discontinuation. For participants who have not died or progressed, second progression-free survival were censored at the date of last contact.
Time frame: Time from start of treatment to death from any cause.
All deaths were included, whether they occurred on study or following treatment discontinuation. For participants who had not died, overall survival was censored at the date of last contact.
Time frame: 12 weeks post start of treatment
Objective response is defined as a complete or partial response determined by RECIST v1.1. Participants without a tumour assessment at 12 weeks are considered to be non-responders.
Time frame: Time from start of treatment until last tumour assessment. Tumour imaging was performed at baseline, week 6, week 12 and then repeated every 12 weeks during trial treatment and follow-up; on average the last response assessment was at 12 weeks.
The best objective response rate consists of the best among all objective responses assessed. The analysis of best objective response was performed with all participants over the whole study period (including re-treatment phase).
Time frame: Time from initial complete or partial response to disease progression or death on study from any cause (defined as death within 110 days of the last study treatment), whichever occurred first.
For patients with an objective response, duration of objective response is defined as the time from initial complete or partial response to disease progression or death on study from any cause (defined as death within 110 days of the last study treatment), whichever occurs first. Participants were censored at the date of last contact.
Time frame: Change at end of treatment from baseline (before start of treatment), an average of 20 weeks.
The questionnaire used is The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Ovarian (FACT-O), version 4. Questionnaires were completed at baseline, week 6, week 12 and then repeated every 12 weeks during trial treatment and until progression/ end of treatment. The algorithm for core construction is based on that provided by the FACT-O manual using overall score. The higher the score, the better the QoL on a 0-152 scale (sum of physical, social, emotional and functional well-being); a negative score at end of treatment indicates a decrease in QoL from baseline.
Time frame: Change at end of treatment from baseline (before start of treatment), an average of 20 weeks.
The questionnaire used is FACT-O (version 4). Questionnaires were completed at baseline, week 6, week 12 and then repeated every 12 weeks during trial treatment and until progression/ end of treatment. The algorithm for core construction is based on that provided by the FACT-O manual using overall sub-score. The higher the score, the better the QoL on a 0-28 scale; a negative score at end of treatment indicates a decrease in QoL from baseline.
Time frame: Change at end of treatment from baseline (before start of treatment), an average of 20 weeks.
The questionnaire used is FACT-O (version 4). Questionnaires were completed at baseline, week 6, week 12 and then repeated every 12 weeks during trial treatment and until progression/ end of treatment. The algorithm for core construction is based on that provided by the FACT-O manual using overall sub-score. The higher the score, the better the QoL on a 0-28 scale; a negative score at end of treatment indicates a decrease in QoL from baseline.
Time frame: Change at end of treatment from baseline (before start of treatment), an average of 20 weeks.
The questionnaire used is FACT-O (version 4). Questionnaires were completed at baseline, week 6, week 12 and then repeated every 12 weeks during trial treatment and until progression/ end of treatment. The algorithm for core construction is based on that provided by the FACT-O manual using overall sub-score. The higher the score, the better the QoL on a 0-24 scale; a negative score at end of treatment indicates a decrease in QoL from baseline.
Time frame: At end of treatment from baseline (before start of treatment), an average of 20 weeks.
The questionnaire used is FACT-O (version 4). Questionnaires were completed at baseline, week 6, week 12 and then repeated every 12 weeks during trial treatment and until progression/ end of treatment. The algorithm for core construction is based on that provided by the FACT-O manual using overall sub-score. The higher the score, the better the QoL on a 0-28 scale; a negative score at end of treatment indicates a decrease in QoL from baseline.
Time frame: Change at end of treatment from baseline (before start of treatment), an average of 20 weeks.
The questionnaire used is FACT-O (version 4). The algorithm for core construction is based on that provided by the FACT-O manual using overall sub-score. The higher the score, the better the QoL on a 0-100 scale (sum of PWB, FWB and OCS); a negative score at end of treatment indicates a decrease in QoL from baseline.
University College, London
Other
A Phase II Study of Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Gynaecological Clear Cell Cancer
Acronym: PEACOCC
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06936878
Advanced Cancer, Digestive System Diseases
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06215950
Adnexal Diseases, Advanced Cancer
Wuhu, Anhui, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05971303
Gynecologic Cancer
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT03674567
Advanced Cancer, Breast Diseases
Gilbert, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details