Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Suspended

NCT Number: NCT03164460

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy or Intensity Modulated Radiation/Proton Therapy in Treating Patients With Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer

This phase II trial studies how well stereotactic body radiation therapy or intensity modulated radiation/proton therapy works in treating patients with head and neck cancer that has come back. Stereotactic body radiation therapy uses special equipment to position a patient and deliver radiation to tumors with high precision. This method can kill tumor cells with fewer doses over a shorter period and cause less damage to normal tissue. Intensity modulated radiation/proton therapy uses high energy x-rays or protons to kill tumor cells and shrink tumors. It is not yet known whether stereotactic body radiation therapy or intensity modulated radiation/proton therapy may work better in treating patients with head and neck cancer.

Why the study stopped: PI Request
Suspended

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

M D Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

About this study

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare the 2-year rate of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)-4.0 grade 3 or higher toxicity at 2 years between the two treatment arms.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare the 2-year locoregional failure free survival (LFFS) in patients being treated with reirradiation with either stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SBRT) versus intensity modulated radiation therapy/intensity modulated proton therapy (IMRT/IMPT).

II. To determine if there is any difference in local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival between the two arms.

III. To compare toxicity using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)-4.0 and Performance Status Scale-HN (Head and Neck).

IV. To compare patient reported outcome (PRO) measures of symptoms using MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI), MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-HN, ACT-HN Symptom Index (FACT-HNSI), MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT), for skull base only, Anterior Skull BASE Questionnaire (ASBQ), for skull base only, Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI), Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS), Performance Status Scale For Head and Neck Cancer Patients (PSS-HN), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem version (V)2.0 (WPAI:SHP), and University of Michigan Xerostomia-Related Quality of Life Scale, Xerostomia and Health Questionnaire (European Quality of Life Five Dimension Three Level [EQ-5D-3L]).

V. Quality-Adjusted-Life-Years (QALY) comparison between IMPT and IMRT. VI. Compare cost-benefit economic analysis of treatment. VII. Perform dosimetric analysis and compare correlates of critical structures.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:

I. To assess potential differences between patients on study and patients who were considered eligible for randomized, were randomized to a treatment arm, but may have dropped out of the study for other reasons after being randomized to; or were denied insurance coverage for the treatment arm she/he was randomized.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized into 1 of 2 groups.

GROUP I: Patients undergo SBRT every other day for a total of 5 treatments.

GROUP II: Patients undergo IMRT/IMPT once daily (Monday-Friday) for up to 30-35 treatments.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 2-3 months, every 3 months for 1 year, and then every 3-4 months for up to 2 years.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with histologically documented recurrent head and neck cancer, or second primary head and neck cancer, AND who have previously received radiation (at least 30 Gy) for head and neck cancer
  • Not eligible for surgery for recurrence or poor surgical candidate
  • Gross disease apparent on imaging (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] or computed tomography [CT])
  • 1-3 sites of recurrence (< 60 cc per site, total volume < 100 cc)
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) = 0, 1, or 2
  • Negative pregnancy test for women of child bearing potential

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who are pregnant or breast feeding
  • Clinically significant uncontrolled major cardiac, respiratory, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal or hematologic disease but not limited to:
  • a) Symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina, or cardiac dysrhythmia not controlled by pacer device
  • b) No myocardial infarction within 3 months of registration
  • Widely metastatic disease (oligometastatic disease acceptable)

Treatment and study plan

Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy

Radiation

Undergo IMRT/IMPT

Other names: IMRT, Intensity Modulated RT, Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy

Proton Radiation

Radiation

Undergo IMRT/IMPT

Other names: Radiation, Charged Particles-Protons

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Radiation

Undergo SBRT

Other names: SABR, SBRT, Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of grade 3+ toxicity (Tox3+) assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)

    Time frame: At 2 years

    Will use the methods of Gooley et al. to estimate the cumulative incidence of Tox3+, as well as competing-risk regression to model cumulative incidence of Tox3+ while treating death not related to Tox3+ as a competing event. The student t-test or the Wilcoxon rank sum test will be used to compare continuous variables between patient groups. The chi-square test or the Fisher's exact test will be applied to evaluate the association between two categorical variables. Logistic regression models will be used to evaluate the effects of the important patient clinical factors including treatment on TOX3+.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Local control defined as absence of local failure

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

    The student t-test or the Wilcoxon rank sum test will be used to compare continuous variables between patient groups. The chi-square test or the Fisher's exact test will be applied to evaluate the association between two categorical variables. Logistic regression models will be used to evaluate the effects of the important patient clinical factors including treatment on TOX3+.

  2. Local failure free survival (LFFS) defined as failure (recurrence or progression) within the prescribed radiation field, including failure within 2 cm of the radiation field

    Time frame: From treatment initiation until local failure or death from any cause, assessed at 2 years

    Will be estimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier. Comparison of time-to-event endpoints by important subgroups will be made using the log-rank test. Proportional hazards regression may be employed for multivariate analysis on time-to-event outcomes.

  3. Incidence of acute grade 3 or higher toxicity assessed by CTCAE

    Time frame: Up to 90 days after completion of radiation therapy

    The student t-test or the Wilcoxon rank sum test will be used to compare continuous variables between patient groups. The chi-square test or the Fisher's exact test will be applied to evaluate the association between two categorical variables. Logistic regression models will be used to evaluate the effects of the important patient clinical factors including treatment on TOX3+.

  4. Incidence of late grade 3 or higher toxicity assessed by CTCAE

    Time frame: 90 days up to 2 years

    The student t-test or the Wilcoxon rank sum test will be used to compare continuous variables between patient groups. The chi-square test or the Fisher's exact test will be applied to evaluate the association between two categorical variables. Logistic regression models will be used to evaluate the effects of the important patient clinical factors including treatment on TOX3+.

  5. Progression free survival (PFS)

    Time frame: From treatment initiation until an LFFS event, or occurrence, recurrence, or progression of distant metastases, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 2 years

    PFS event is defined as an LFFS event, or occurrence, recurrence or progression of distant metastases. Comparison of time-to-event endpoints by important subgroups will be made using the log-rank test. Proportional hazards regression may be employed for multivariate analysis on time-to-event outcomes.

  6. Overall survival

    Time frame: From treatment initiation until time to death from any cause, assessed up to 2 years

    Comparison of time-to-event endpoints by important subgroups will be made using the log-rank test. Proportional hazards regression may be employed for multivariate analysis on time-to-event outcomes.

  7. Patient reported outcomes (PROs)

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

    Generalized linear models for the repeated measures analysis will be performed to assess the change in PROs overtime with important covariates including treatment in the models.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Other

Collaborators

  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Registry information

Official study title

Phase II Randomized Trial of Stereotactic Onco-Ablative Reirradiation Versus Conventionally Fractionated Conformal Radiotherapy for Patients With Small Inoperable Head and Neck Tumors (SOAR-HN)

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
May 23, 2017
Registry last updated
Aug 10, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.