MB-102-- single dose of 4 µmol/kg
Drug4 µmol/kg administered by intravenous injection over 30 seconds, followed by a 10 mL normal saline flush administered intravenously over 30 seconds.
Other names: Relmapirazin
NCT Number: NCT02772276
This study was a pilot, safety, and pharmacokinetic study of MB-102 versus iohexol and the use of the non-invasive optical renal function monitor (ORFM) device in normal and compromised renal function participants with different skin color types.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Riverside Clinical Research, Edgewater, Florida, United States
The objectives of this study were to evaluate the safety and tolerability of single and multiple doses of MB-102 in participants with normal and impaired kidney function; to determine plasma pharmacokinetics of MB-102 compared to the pharmacokinetics of iohexol in participants with normal and impaired kidney function; to demonstrate that MB-102-transdermal-fluorescence-measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using the optical renal function monitor (ORFM) Brilliance device is aligned with MB-102 plasma GFR; to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the ORFM investigational medical device prototypes QuantumLeap, Radiance, and Brilliance for the non-invasive transdermal fluorescent detection of MB-102 in participants with a range of skin color types; and to determine the optimal dose of MB-102 for non-invasive measurement.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Main Criteria for Inclusion (Quantum Leap and Radiance device)
Main Criteria for Inclusion (Brilliance device)
Normal-CKD Stage 2/QuantumLeap; Normal-CKD Stage 2/Radiance; Normal-CKD Stage 2/Brilliance algorithm optimization; Normal-CKD Stage 2/Brilliance sensor optimization; Normal-CKD Stage 2/Brilliance sensor optimization; and Normal-CKD Stage 2/Brilliance (1-2 sensors)
CKD Stage 3-4/QuantumLeap
CKD Stage 3-5/Radiance; CKD Stage 3-5/Brilliance algorithm optimization; CKD Stage 3-5/Brilliance sensor validation; and CKD Stage 3-5/Brilliance 1-2 sensors
Exclusion criteria
Main Criteria for Exclusion (QuantumLeap device)
Additional Exclusion: Normal-CKD Stage 2/QuantumLeap
Additional Exclusion: CKD Stage 3-4/QuantumLeap
Main Criteria for Exclusion: (Radiance device)
o Males must be willing to practice abstinence or utilize adequate contraception from dosing day to at least 7 days post dose
Main Criteria for Exclusion: (Brilliance device)
o Males must be unwilling to practice abstinence or utilize adequate contraception from dosing day to at least 7 days post dose
Additional Exclusion: Normal-CKD Stage 2/Radiance; Normal-CKD Stage 2/Brilliance algorithm optimization; Normal-CKD Stage 2/Brilliance sensor optimization; Normal-CKD Stage 2/Brilliance sensor validation; and Normal-CKD Stage 2/Brilliance (1-2 sensors)
Additional Exclusion: CKD Stage 3-5/Radiance; CKD Stage 3-5/Brilliance algorithm optimization; CKD Stage 3-5/Brilliance sensor validation; and CKD Stage 3-5/Brilliance 1-2 sensors
4 µmol/kg administered by intravenous injection over 30 seconds, followed by a 10 mL normal saline flush administered intravenously over 30 seconds.
Other names: Relmapirazin
130 mg administered by intravenous injection over 30 seconds, followed by a 10 mL normal saline flush administered intravenously over 30 seconds. A subset of participants will receive two doses of MB-102, 12 hours apart.
Other names: Relmapirazin
130 mg administered by intravenous injection over 30 seconds, followed by a 10 mL normal saline flush administered intravenously over 30 seconds.
Other names: Relmapirazin
4 µmol/kg administered by intravenous injection over 30 seconds, followed by a 10 mL normal saline flush administered intravenously over 30 seconds. A subset of participants will receive two doses of MB-102, 12 hours apart.
Other names: Relmapirazin
5 mL of a 647 mg/mL solution administered by intravenous injection over 30 seconds, followed by a 10 mL normal saline flush administered intravenously over 30 seconds
Other names: Omnipaque 300
Optical Renal Function Monitor (ORFM)
Optical Renal Function Monitor (ORFM)
Optical Renal Function Monitor (ORFM)
Optical Renal Function Monitor (ORFM)
Time frame: From the time of dosing through the follow-up visit, up to 10 days
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury, or untoward clinical signs (including abnormal laboratory findings) in subjects, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to the investigational medical device or drug.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) minutes post dose.
Blood samples were collected pre-dose (time 0) and at 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) minutes post dose, and were analyzed using validated analytical methods. Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax; measured in ng/mL) was directly determined from the concentration-time data.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) minutes post dose.
Blood samples were collected pre-dose (time 0) and at 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) minutes post dose, and were analyzed using validated analytical methods. Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax; measured in ng/mL) was directly determined from the concentration-time data.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) minutes post dose.
Blood samples were collected pre-dose (time 0) and at 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) minutes post dose, and were analyzed using validated analytical methods. The time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax; measured in minutes) was directly determined from the concentration-time data.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) minutes post dose.
Blood samples were collected pre-dose (time 0) and at 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) minutes post dose, and were analyzed using validated analytical methods. The time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax; measured in minutes) was directly determined from the concentration-time data.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) minutes post dose.
Blood samples were collected pre-dose (time 0) and at 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) minutes post dose, and were analyzed using validated analytical methods. The elimination half-life (the time required for the concentration of the drug to reach half of its original value) was calculated as t1/2 λz= ln(2)/ λz.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) minutes post dose.
Blood samples were collected pre-dose (time 0) and at 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) minutes post dose, and were analyzed using validated analytical methods. The elimination half-life (the time required for the concentration of the drug to reach half of its original value) was calculated as t1/2 λz= ln(2)/ λz.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) minutes post dose.
Blood samples were collected pre-dose (time 0) and at 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) minutes post dose, and were analyzed using validated analytical methods. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (ng*min/mL) was be estimated from time 0 to the last measurable concentration using noncompartmental analyses.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) minutes post dose.
Blood samples were collected pre-dose (time 0) and at 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) minutes post dose, and were analyzed using validated analytical methods. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (ng*min/mL) was be estimated from time 0 to the last measurable concentration using noncompartmental analyses.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) minutes post dose.
Blood samples were collected pre-dose (time 0) and at 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) minutes post dose, and were analyzed using validated analytical methods. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (ng*min/mL) from time 0 to infinity was calculated as: AUC∞ = AUClast + LQC/λz where LQC is the predicted concentration (based on the terminal regression) at the time of the last measurable concentration.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) minutes post dose.
Blood samples were collected pre-dose (time 0) and at 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) minutes post dose, and were analyzed using validated analytical methods. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (ng*min/mL) from time 0 to infinity was calculated as: AUC∞ = AUClast + LQC/λz where LQC is the predicted concentration (based on the terminal regression) at the time of the last measurable concentration.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) minutes post dose.
Blood samples were collected pre-dose (time 0) and at 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) minutes post dose, and were analyzed using validated analytical methods. Total plasma clearance (the volume of plasma cleared of the drug over time) was calculated as: Clp = Dose/ AUC∞.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) minutes post dose.
Blood samples were collected pre-dose (time 0) and at 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) minutes post dose, and were analyzed using validated analytical methods. Total plasma clearance (the volume of plasma cleared of the drug over time) was calculated as: Clp = Dose/ AUC∞.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) minutes post dose.
Blood samples were collected pre-dose (time 0) and at 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) minutes post dose, and were analyzed using validated analytical methods. The terminal rate constant (λz) was determined by linear regression of the terminal linear phase of the log plasma concentration-time profile.
Time frame: Pre-dose and 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) minutes post dose.
Blood samples were collected pre-dose (time 0) and at 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) minutes post dose, and were analyzed using validated analytical methods. The terminal rate constant (λz) was determined by linear regression of the terminal linear phase of the log plasma concentration-time profile.
Time frame: Pre-dose and each time the participant voids up to 720 minutes post dose
Urine samples were collected pre-dose (time 0) and 5 mL urine samples were collected each time the subject voided. The total volume of urine excreted was recorded until 12 hours post-dose, and was analyzed using validated analytical methods. Renal clearance (the volume of plasma cleared of the drug by the kidneys over time) was calculated as: CLr = Ae/ AUClast, where Ae is the cumulative amount of analyte excreted in urine over the sampling interval.
Time frame: Pre-dose and each time the participant voids up to 720 minutes post dose
Urine samples were collected pre-dose (time 0) and 5 mL urine samples were collected each time the subject voided. The total volume of urine excreted was recorded until 12 hours post-dose, and was analyzed using validated analytical methods. Renal clearance (the volume of plasma cleared of the drug by the kidneys over time) was calculated as: CLr = Ae/ AUClast, where Ae is the cumulative amount of analyte excreted in urine over the sampling interval.
Time frame: Pre-dose (time 0) and 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) minutes post dose
Blood samples were collected pre-dose (time 0) and at 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) minutes post dose, and were analyzed using validated analytical methods. Transdermal fluorescence intensity at the time of blood sampling as measured by the QuantumLeap device was documented, and the correlation between the transdermal fluorescence intensity of MB-102 as measured by the QuantumLeap device and the plasma concentration of MB-102 at each time point in the renal excretion phase was calculated.
Time frame: Pre-dose (time 0) and 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) minutes post dose
Blood samples were collected pre-dose (time 0) and at 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) minutes post dose, and will be analyzed using validated analytical methods. Transdermal fluorescence intensity at the time of blood sampling as measured by the Radiance device was documented, and the correlation between the transdermal fluorescence intensity of MB-102 as measured by the Radiance device and the plasma concentration of MB-102 at each time point in the renal excretion phase was calculated.
Time frame: Pre-dose (time 0) and 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, and 480 minutes post dose
Blood samples were collected pre-dose (time 0) and at 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, and 480 minutes post dose, and were analyzed using validated analytical methods. Transdermal fluorescence intensity at the time of blood sampling as measured by the Brilliance device was documented, and the correlation between the transdermal fluorescence intensity of MB-102 as measured by the Brilliance device and the plasma concentration of MB-102 at each time point in the renal excretion phase was calculated.
Time frame: Pre-dose (time 0) and 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) and 960, 1440, 1920, 2400, and 2880 (±30 min) minutes post dose
Blood samples were collected pre-dose (time 0) and at 5, 10, 15; (± 1 or 2 min), 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300 (±5 min), 360, 480, 600 and 720 (±10 min) and 960, 1440, 1920, 2400, and 2880 (±30 min) minutes post dose, and were analyzed using validated analytical methods. Transdermal fluorescence intensity at the time of blood sampling as measured by the Brilliance device was documented, and the correlation between the transdermal fluorescence intensity of MB-102 as measured by the Brilliance device and the plasma concentration of MB-102 at each time point in the renal excretion phase was calculated.
Time frame: From the time of dosing through the follow-up visit, up to 10 days
The number of participants with adverse events related to the use of the QuantumLeap device was documented.
Time frame: From the time of dosing through the follow-up visit, up to 10 days
The number of participants with adverse events related to the use of the Radiance device was documented.
Time frame: From the time of dosing through the follow-up visit, up to 10 days
The number of participants with adverse events related to the use of the Brilliance device was documented.
MediBeacon
Industry
A Pilot Safety and Pharmacokinetic Study of MB-102 Versus Iohexol and the Use of the Non-invasive Optical Renal Function Monitor (ORFM) Device in Subjects With Normal and Impaired Renal Function and a Range of Skin Color Types
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07751861
Acute Kidney Injury, Female Urogenital Diseases
Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT06248359
Acute Kidney Injury, Female Urogenital Diseases
Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07518992
Acute Kidney Injury, Confusion
Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07746063
Acute Kidney Injury, Female Urogenital Diseases
Braunschweig, Germany
View Trial Details