Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02741921

Conventional Double-lumen Tube vs VivaSight DL

The investigators sought to compare the time to intubation and success rate of the endotracheal intubation using standard double-lumen tube and video tube ETView DL in an adult cadaver model in normal and difficult airway conditions.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Endotracheal Intubation

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Medical University of Warsaw, Department of Emergency Medicine

Warsaw, Masovia, 02-005, Poland

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • fresh adult cadavers

Exclusion criteria

  • cadavers with face injures

Treatment and study plan

VivaSight DL

Device

intubation using VivaSight DL tube

conventional double-lumen tube

Device

intubation using conventional double-lumen tube

Primary outcomes

  1. Time required for endotracheal intubation

    Time frame: 1 day

    time from pick up the tube to first ventilation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time required for visual confirmation of double lumen tube position position

    Time frame: 1 day

    Time required for visual confirmation of double lumen tube position position

  2. success rate of intubation attempt

    Time frame: 1 day

    success rate of first intubation attempt

  3. Ease of intubation

    Time frame: 1 day

    To access subjective opinion about the difficulty of each intubation method, participants were asked to rate it on a visual analog scale (VAS) with a score from 1 (extremely easy) to 10 (extremely difficult).

Interested in participating?

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Warsaw

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Ability of Anesthesiologist to Placid a Double-lumen Tube. A Randomized Crossover Cadaver Study Comparing VivaSight DL and Conventional Double-lumen Tube

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Apr 18, 2016
Registry last updated
Apr 18, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.