Radiation Oncology Department at the University of Arizona Heath Network
Tucson, Arizona, 85724-5024, United States
NCT Number: NCT02379988
This is a pilot study to determine whether the addition of inspiratory hold (breath holding) can decrease the radiation dose that the heart and lung receive for patients being treated for left sided breast cancer.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Tucson, Arizona, 85724-5024, United States
Subjects have a standard of care CT simulation, which includes an additional breath hold CT. Inspiratory gated breath-hold will be used. Two radiation plans will be generated: one for the CT scan performed free breathing, and one for the CT scan performed with inspiratory gated breath hold. The cardiac and lung doses will be determined. At the discretion of the treating physician, the plan with the lower cardiac and lung dose may be used to treat the patient.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
This is a pilot study to determine whether the addition of inspiratory hold (breath holding) can decrease the radiation dose that the heart and lung receives for patients being treated for left sided breast cancer.
Time frame: Treatment Day 1 (both pFB and pDIBH scans were done on the same day)
The primary endpoints of this study were to evaluate the feasibility of the combination of prone positioning and RPM pDIPH for breast cancer radiation treatment. Each woman enrolled in the study had 2 radiation plans generated: one for the pFB scan and one for the pDIBH scan. The mean difference between the dosimetrically determined heart, left anterior descending (LAD) artery, and left lung radiation doses were computed with the associated 95% confidence interval; however, the Wilcoxin paired signed rank test was used and listed below as the primary analysis because of the non-normal distributions.
Time frame: Treatment Day 1
This outcome was measured by looking at the maximum dose to the heart and maximum dose to the left lung in patients using the free breathing method versus the breath holding method in the prone position. The mean of the maximum doses for each patient was taken and compared using the Wilcoxin Paired Signed Rank Test.
Time frame: Treatment Day 1
The breast volume was evaluated using the dose-volume histogram. A paired t-test was used to assess if breast volume and the mean difference for heart was statistically significant. Because paired data were generated the number of women required was less than if 2 independent samples of women were to be used.
Time frame: Treatment Day 1
This outcome was measured by looking at the maximum dose to the LAD in patients using the free breathing method versus the breath holding method in the prone position. The mean of the maximum doses for each patient was taken and compared using the Wilcoxin Paired Signed Rank Test.
University of Arizona
Other
Pilot Study For Prone Breath Hold Technique to Decrease Cardiac and Pulmonary Doses in Women Receiving Left Breast Radiotherapy
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06384417
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04902872
Adnexal Diseases, Appendiceal Neoplasms
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06865534
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Marburg, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT05889728
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
View Trial Details