Bone Scan
ProcedureUndergo bone scan
Other names: Bone Scintigraphy
NCT Number: NCT02135042
There are two study questions we are asking in this randomized phase II/III trial based on a blood biomarker, Epstein Barr virus (EBV) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) for locoregionally advanced non-metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer. All patients will first undergo standard concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy. When this standard treatment is completed, if there is no detectable EBV DNA in their plasma, then patients are randomized to either standard adjuvant cisplatin and fluorouracil chemotherapy or observation. If there is still detectable levels of plasma EBV DNA, patients will be randomized to standard cisplatin and fluorouracil chemotherapy versus gemcitabine and paclitaxel. Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays to kill tumor cells and shrink tumors. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cisplatin, fluorouracil, gemcitabine hydrochloride, and paclitaxel work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. It is not yet known whether giving cisplatin and fluorouracil is more effective than gemcitabine hydrochloride and paclitaxel after radiation therapy in treating patients with nasopharyngeal cancer.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine whether substituting adjuvant concurrent high dose cisplatin (CDDP) and fluorouracil (5-FU) with gemcitabine (gemcitabine hydrochloride) and paclitaxel will result in superior progression-free survival. (Detectable Plasma Epstein Barr Virus [EBV] Deoxyribonucleic Acid [DNA] Cohort randomized Phase II) II. To determine whether omitting adjuvant CDDP and 5-FU (observation alone in the adjuvant setting) will result in non-inferior overall survival as compared with those patients receiving adjuvant CDDP and 5-FU chemotherapy. (Undetectable Plasma EBV DNA Cohort Phase III)
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Time to distant metastasis. (Randomized Phase II and Phase III) II. Time to local progression. (Randomized Phase II and Phase III) III. Time to regional progression. (Randomized Phase II and Phase III) IV. Progression-free survival (Undetectable Cohort). V. Overall survival (Detectable Cohort). VI. Acute and late toxicity profiles based on clinician-reported Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version (v.) 4. (Randomized Phase II and Phase III) VII. Death during or within 30 days of end of protocol treatment. (Randomized Phase II and Phase III) VIII. Quality of life (general and physical well-being). (Randomized Phase II and Phase III) IX. Quality of life (hearing). (Randomized Phase II and Phase III) X. Quality of life (peripheral neuropathy). (Randomized Phase II and Phase III) XI. Cost effectiveness. (Randomized Phase II and Phase III)
OUTLINE:
Patients undergo intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) once daily (QD) 5 days a week for 6.5 to 7 weeks and receive low-dose cisplatin intravenously (IV) over 30-60 minutes or high-dose cisplatin IV over 3 hours once weekly during IMRT. Beginning 1 week after chemoradiation, plasma samples are collected for EBV DNA analysis.
PHASE II: Patients with detectable EBV DNA from pre-treatment analysis are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
ARM I: Patients receive PF regimen comprising cisplatin IV over 60-180 minutes and fluorouracil IV over 96 hours continuously beginning at least 4 weeks after completion of IMRT. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 3 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
ARM II: Patients receive GT regimen comprising paclitaxel IV over 1 hour and gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 at least 4 weeks after completion of IMRT. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
PHASE III:
Patients with undetectable EBV DNA from pre-treatment analysis are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
ARM III: Patients receive PF regimen as in Arm I.
ARM IV: Patients undergo clinical observation.
Patients undergo computed tomography (CT) scan, magnetic resonance imaging, (MRI) positron emission tomography (PET) scan, and bone scan throughout the study.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Undergo bone scan
Other names: Bone Scintigraphy
Given IV
Other names: Abiplatin, Blastolem, Briplatin, CDDP, Cis-diammine-dichloroplatinum, Cis-diamminedichloridoplatinum, Cis-diamminedichloro Platinum (II), Cis-diamminedichloroplatinum, Cis-dichloroammine Platinum (II), Cis-platinous Diamine Dichloride, Cis-platinum, Cis-platinum II, Cis-platinum II Diamine Dichloride, Cismaplat, Cisplatina, Cisplatinum, Cisplatyl, Citoplatino, Citosin, Cysplatyna, DDP, Lederplatin, Metaplatin, Neoplatin, Peyrone's Chloride, Peyrone's Salt, Placis, Plastistil, Platamine, Platiblastin, Platiblastin-S, Platinex, Platinol, Platinol- AQ, Platinol-AQ, Platinol-AQ VHA Plus, Platinoxan, Platinum, Platinum Diamminodichloride, Platiran, Platistin, Platosin
Undergo clinical observation
Other names: observation
Undergo CT scan
Other names: CAT, CAT Scan, Computed Axial Tomography, Computerized Axial Tomography, Computerized axial tomography (procedure), Computerized Tomography, Computerized Tomography (CT) scan, CT, CT Scan, Diagnostic CAT Scan, Diagnostic CAT Scan Service Type, tomography
Given IV
Other names: 5 Fluorouracil, 5 Fluorouracilum, 5 FU, 5-Fluoro-2,4(1H, 3H)-pyrimidinedione, 5-Fluorouracil, 5-Fluracil, 5-Fu, 5FU, AccuSite, Carac, Fluoro Uracil, Fluouracil, Flurablastin, Fluracedyl, Fluracil, Fluril, Fluroblastin, Ribofluor, Ro 2-9757, Ro-2-9757
Given IV
Other names: dFdCyd, Difluorodeoxycytidine Hydrochloride, Gemcitabine HCI, Gemzar, LY 188011, LY-188011, LY188011
Undergo IMRT
Other names: IMRT, Intensity modulated radiation therapy (procedure), Intensity Modulated RT, Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, Radiation, Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
Correlative studies
Undergo MRI
Other names: Magnetic Resonance, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Magnetic resonance imaging (procedure), Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan, Medical Imaging, Magnetic Resonance / Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, MR, MR Imaging, MRI, MRI Scan, MRIs, NMR Imaging, NMRI, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging, sMRI, Structural MRI
Given IV
Other names: Anzatax, Asotax, Bristaxol, Praxel, Taxol, Taxol Konzentrat
Undergo PET scan
Other names: Medical Imaging, Positron Emission Tomography, PET, PET Scan, Positron emission tomography (procedure), Positron Emission Tomography Scan, Positron-Emission Tomography, PT
Ancillary studies
Other names: Quality of Life Assessment
Time frame: Up to 7 years
Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for each arm. Their distributions will be compared between treatment arms with a 1-sided stratified log rank test. for stratification factors and concurrent cisplatin dose. A one-sided log rank test will be used to compare the PFS at a significance level of 0.1379.
Time frame: Up to 7 years
Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for each arm. Their distributions will be compared between treatment arms with a 1-sided stratified log rank test. for stratification factors and concurrent cisplatin dose. The confidence interval approach will be used for the final analysis of OS.
Time frame: Up to 7 years
The cumulative incidence method will be used to estimate local, regional, and distant failure rates. The failure rates for the experimental treatment will be compared against the control using a failure-specific log-rank test. Multivariate analysis will be performed using the Cox proportional hazards model.
Time frame: Up to 7 years
The cumulative incidence method will be used to estimate local, regional, and distant failure rates. The failure rates for the experimental treatment will be compared against the control using a failure-specific log-rank test. Multivariate analysis will be performed using the Cox proportional hazards model.
Time frame: Up to 7 years
Defined as an estimated increase in the size of the tumor (product of the perpendicular diameters of the two largest dimensions) of greater than 25%, taking as reference the smallest value of all previous measurements or appearance of new areas of malignant disease. The cumulative incidence method will be used to estimate local, regional, and distant failure rates. The failure rates for the experimental treatment will be compared against the control using a failure-specific log-rank test. Multivariate analysis will be performed using the Cox proportional hazards model.
Time frame: Up to 7 years
Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for each arm. Their distributions will be compared between treatment arms with a 1-sided stratified log rank test. for stratification factors and concurrent cisplatin dose.
Time frame: Up to 7 years
Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for each arm. Their distributions will be compared between treatment arms with a 1-sided stratified log rank test. for stratification factors and concurrent cisplatin dose.
Time frame: Up to 7 years
Rates of specific acute toxicity profiles and late toxicity profiles will be estimated using a binomial distribution along with their associated 95% confidence intervals and will be compared using Fisher's exact test between the 2 treatment arms.
Time frame: Up to 7 years
Rates of specific acute toxicity profiles and late toxicity profiles will be estimated using a binomial distribution along with their associated 95% confidence intervals and will be compared using Fisher's exact test between the 2 treatment arms.
Time frame: Up to 30 days of end of protocol treatment
Incidence of death will be determined.
Time frame: Baseline to up to 1 year
Correlation between categorical measures will be summarized by odds ratios, chi-square tests, and associated measures. Adjusted correlation may be derived from analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models or derived directly using nonparametric analysis of variance (ANOVA) models if normality assumption is violated. Correlations between HHIE-S PRO scores and PTA and FACT-NP hearing, and PTA will be compared as dependent statistics
Time frame: Baseline to up to 24 months
Will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-Nasopharyngeal (NP). Changes in patient reported outcome (PRO) scores will be correlated to clearance or non-clearance of EBV titers. Descriptive statistics derived from FACT-NP will be used to enrich the understanding of QOL as it pertains to the 2 phase III arms of observation versus additional adjuvant chemotherapy. Univariable and multivariable analysis will be performed using the Cox proportional hazards model for OS and distant metastasis. Pearson correlation will be estimated between general and physical well-being. QOL measures and change from baseline will be correlated to EBV DNA.
Time frame: Baseline to up to 24 months
Will be assessed by the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening version (HHIE-S). QOL analysis including overall score and change from baseline will be summarized using mean and standard deviation at each time point for each arm. Overall and nasopharyngeal-specific QOL, hearing QOL (FACT-NP hearing domain, HHIE-S scores), peripheral neuropathy QOL over the short and long term and pure-tone audiometry (PTA) scores will be compared using a two sample independent t test and paired t test if the comparison is within the experimental arm between different time points.
Time frame: Baseline to up to 24 months
Changes in QOL (peripheral neuropathy) will be assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-Taxane.
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Incremental cost effectiveness ratios will be compared to determine the probability of cost effectiveness of various interventions, with sensitivity analyses to identify model weaknesses. The expected value of perfect information will be determined to delimit the upper boundary for cost-effective future investment in this area of research.
NRG Oncology
Other
Randomized Phase II and Phase III Studies of Individualized Treatment for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Based on Biomarker Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03475212
Adenoviridae Infections, Adenovirus Infection
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04308278
DNA Virus Infections, EBV Infection
Heule, Kortrijk, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT03159364
Actinomycetales Infections, Adenoviridae Infections
Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07685457
BKV Infection, CMV Infection
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial Details