Manchester Royal Eye Hospital
Manchester, M13 9WL, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT01701700
Over 1 million people in the UK suffer from untreatable visual impairment, many of them elderly. The major complaint of visually impaired people is their inability to carry out simple tasks, especially those involving reading. It is known that this activity limitation is a major cause of depression in an older population, and it is reflected in reduced quality of life. Low vision clinics, mostly based within hospital ophthalmology departments, dispense optical magnifiers to allow patients to carry out these tasks again, but these devices do have limitations (unusual posture, short working distance, monocular viewing). Although electronic magnifiers have been around since the 1960s, they were initially very large and expensive. Recent advances in technology have brought about an explosion in the number and range of portable and moderately-priced aids, which can be used binocularly, in a natural working position: these are currently not available through the NHS. Evidence is needed as to whether these portable hand-held electronic magnifiers could offer a significant benefit to the majority of patients, and therefore whether they should be routinely dispensed in low vision clinics.
The proposed study is a two-arm randomised crossover trial with existing users of optical magnifiers being assigned to use a hand-held electronic magnifier in addition to their existing devices for 2 months. Reading and task performance will be measured with the aid, and compared to the performance with optical aids, and the patient will be asked to report on the comparisons between the aids.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–95 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Manchester, M13 9WL, United Kingdom
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Other names: electronic video magnifier, portable CCTV, electronic vision enhancement system, EVES
Other names: magnifiers
Time frame: Change from baseline at 2 months and 4 months
Use of Manchester Low Vision Questionnaire to quantify device usage
Time frame: Change from baseline at 2 months and 4 months
Reading speed using the device assessed by MNREAD test
Time frame: Change from baseline at 2 months and 4 months
total time taken to performance 5 selected activities of daily living using aids if required
Time frame: Change from baseline at 2 months and 4 months
Use of NV-VFQ-15 questionnaire to self-rate difficulty in performance of near vision activities
Time frame: Change from baseline at 2 months and 4 months
Use of EQ-5D and VISQOL questionnaires to self-rate health-related quality of life
Time frame: Change from baseline at 2 months and 4 months
use of WHO-5 questionnaire to self-rate wellbeing
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
Other Gov
The Effectiveness of Portable Electronic Vision Enhancement Systems (EVES) in Comparison to Optical Magnifiers for Near Vision Activities in Visual Impairment - The p-EVES Study
Acronym: p-EVES
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07771946
Blindness, Eye Diseases
Ankara, Altindağ, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT01606826
Asthma, Bronchial Diseases
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05064319
Bipolar Disorder, Bipolar I Disorder
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07747792
Actinomycetales Infections, Bacterial Infections
Lusaka, Lusaka Province, Zambia
View Trial Details