Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00859846

Ultrasound Guided Arterial Line Placement in Long Axis Versus Short Axis in Pediatric Patients

The use of ultrasound is becoming widespread to guide the placement of arterial lines for both vascular access and regional anesthesia in the field of anesthesia. Arterial line placement can be challenging, especially in the pediatric population. Frequently multiple attempts are required with relatively high failure rates. This can result in excessive needle punctures and extended OR times. A few studies have looked at the use of ultrasound to decrease OR time and increase success rates both in adult and pediatric populations. These studies compared the traditional palpation method with either short axis or long axis views of the vessel using ultrasound guidance. No study to date has compared short axis and long axis views for arterial line placement in either the pediatric or adult population. Our study compares success rates and OR times when long and short axis methods of arterial line insertion are employed in the pediatric population.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

General Anesthesia

Age range

1 day–14 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center Deparment of Anesthesiology

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104, United States

About this study

An Arterial line is an intraoperative monitor that is frequently placed in the pediatric population. Due to their smaller anatomy and more compliant skin, arterial lines can be more difficult to insert in the pediatric population than in adults. Additionally, lower perfusion pressure and larger subcutaneous adipose tissue can make pulse palpation more difficult. Ultrasound is a modality that can directly image the radial, ulnar, or brachial artery. Along with 2D ultrasound, doppler ultrasound can be utilized to confirm that an artery is not a vein. Once the vessel is identified, the vessel can be viewed in either the long or short access. The ultrasound beam is only 1 millimeter thick so a practitioner must stabilize the probe to view the vessel, especially in the long axis view. Once the artery is viewed in long axis, the needle can be directly visualized all the way into the vessel. Visualization of a guidewire or catheter in the vessel can confirm proper arterial access. In a short access ultrasound view, it is possible to see tissue movement and sometimes a hyperechoic (bright) dot which represents the needle. Tissue movement can help confirm the needle is immediately above the artery at all times. The advantage of the short axis view is that less precision is needed to hold and position the transducer than with the long axis view. The disadvantage of the short axis view is that the operator cannot see the tip of the angiocatheter as it enters the vessel. As a result, the proximal portion of the angiocatheter can be above the artery but the distal tip could be to the side of the artery.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • The investigators will identify patients 0 to 14 years of age who are classified as ASA physical status ≤4 and scheduled to have surgery under general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

  • History of vasculitis, autoimmune disease, Reynauds phenomenon or disease
  • History of no collateral perfusion
  • The absence of an upper extremity artery to cannulate such as a bilateral amputee
  • A child in DHS custody
  • Infection at the site of insertion
  • Patient refusal.

Treatment and study plan

Arterial Line Placement

Procedure

The following measures will be collected and compared.

  • Time (in seconds) required for successful placement of the arterial line. This is the time elapsed between either palpation or placement of ultrasound probe on the patient's wrist and the successful demonstration of arterial waveform on the anesthesia monitor.
  • number of attempts, defined as forward advancements of needle, required to cannulate the artery.
  • number of separate skin punctures.
  • number of arteries into which entry is attempted.

Other names: Ultrasound guided (short vs Long axis)

Primary outcomes

  1. Using the long axis ultrasound view increases the success rate of arterial line insertions compared to using the short axis view.

    Time frame: 1.5 year

    Using the long axis ultrasound view increases the success rate of arterial line

Secondary outcomes

  1. Using the short axis view, when successful, results in quicker insertion than when using the long axis view.

    Time frame: 1.5 year

    Using the short axis view, when successful, results in quicker insertion than when using the long axis view.

Interested in participating?

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Oklahoma

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Ultrasound Guided Arterial Line Placement in Long Axis Versus Short Axis in Pediatric Patients.

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Mar 11, 2009
Registry last updated
Oct 12, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.