Riccardo De Giorgi
Oxford, OX3 7JX, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT03966859
Work in our group has revealed that short-term (7-day) administration of antidepressants produces positive biases in the processing of emotional information in healthy volunteers. Such effect might be an important neuropsychological mechanism of antidepressant action.
The current study will investigate the effect of seven-day administration of atorvastatin 20mg on emotional and reward processing tasks in healthy volunteers. There is evidence that statins may exert antidepressant effects via anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant pathways, and it is therefore predicted that atorvastatin will have positive effects on emotional and reward processing.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–50 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Oxford, OX3 7JX, United Kingdom
Depression is common and associated with considerable health disability. Traditional antidepressants mainly work by modulating monoamine levels in the synaptic cleft; however, the evidence that depression is caused by impaired serotonin or noradrenaline activity is weak and inconsistent, and indeed current antidepressant strategies remain burdened by partial efficacy, poor side-effects profile, and a slow onset of therapeutic action. Therefore, there is a pressing need to develop antidepressant medications with novel non-monoaminergic mechanisms of action - or, conversely, to identify alternative pathophysiological pathways leading to depression that can be targeted with new drugs. Intriguingly, there is growing evidence that both peripheral and central inflammation play a role in the pathophysiology of depression.
Patients with depression consistently show negative biases in emotional processing, which are believed to play a key role in the aetiology and maintenance of their clinical symptoms. Overall, robust evidence suggests that early changes in emotional processing can serve as valid surrogate markers of antidepressant efficacy; for example, seven days' treatment with selective serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (citalopram and reboxetine respectively) compared to placebo decreases the recognition of negative facial expressions and recall of negative versus positive stimuli in healthy volunteers. Conversely, another study using the pro-inflammatory cytokine interferon-α showed that inflammatory-mediated depression can be associated with an increased recognition of negative facial expressions. Furthermore, depression associated with inflammation is characterised by significant symptoms of anhedonia, which has been linked to diminished neural responses to reward anticipation. Such reward-deficit is particularly refractory to conventional serotoninergic and noradrenergic antidepressants, and even the antidepressant bupropion (a noradrenaline and dopamine reuptake inhibitor), whilst inducing positive changes in emotional processing, appears to worsen reward processing. However, the reversal of this deficit in reward processing is still considered as a valuable marker of target engagement for anti-inflammatory drugs in depression, as a more sensitive outcome measure than traditional rating scales designed to capture the global clinical symptomatology.
The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors or statins are recommended and have been widely used since the '80s for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases. It is now established that these medications have significant anti-inflammatory effects that are independent from their lipid-lowering properties, as well as appearing early in treatment only after seven day of administration. Statins are considered extremely safe drugs: their more common side-effect are muscle pain or weakness (usually mild and quickly responding to stopping or switching medication) and elevation of liver transaminases (significant only in case of pre-existing hepatic disease), whereas more serious adverse events include rhabdomyolysis (very rare but severe myopathy associated with elevated creatine kinase and myoglobinuria), new-onset diabetes mellitus (in predisposed individual with pre-existing hyperglycaemia), and haemorrhagic stroke (in patients with prior haemorrhagic stroke or lacunar infarct); however, clinical trials have ultimately concluded that such adverse events attributed to statin therapy in routine practice are not actually caused by it, especially at doses lower than 80mg/day and when used for less than 52 weeks. Other common (≥ 1/100, < 1/10) but usually mild side-effects include: nasopharyngitis, pharyngo-laryngeal pain, epistaxis, headache, and gastrointestinal disturbances (constipation, diarrhoea, flatulence, dyspepsia, nausea). Importantly, a potential antidepressant effect for statins has been confirmed in animals, as well as clinically in observational and interventional studies. Although their anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant properties have been involved, the mechanisms underlying the antidepressant effects of statins remain unclear, therefore further translational studies have been advocated in order to elucidate this aspect.
In this exploratory study, we will investigate the effect of seven-day administration of atorvastatin 20mg once daily compared to placebo on emotional and reward processing tasks in 50 healthy volunteers. In view of the previous evidence that statins may exert antidepressant effects via anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant pathways, we predict that atorvastatin will have positive effect on emotional and reward processing.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
oral dose, once daily for 7 days
Other names: Lipitor, Atorva
oral dose, once daily for 7 days
Other names: placebo
Time frame: Assessed during the research visit after the seventh day of atorvastatin or placebo administration, i.e. on the eight day after the patient started taking atorvastatin or placebo
Faces representing varying degrees [from "neutral" (0%) to "full prototypical emotion" (100%) of basic emotions (happiness, fear, anger, disgust, sadness, surprise)] are displayed on the screen and participants are asked to quickly and correctly classify them. Accuracy and reaction times on positive vs negative stimuli are compared between those receiving drug and placebo.
Time frame: Assessed during the research visit after the seventh day of atorvastatin or placebo administration, i.e. on the eight day after the patient started taking atorvastatin or placebo
Faces acting as positive or negative emotional stimuli (happy or fearful facial expressions) are presented together with a matched neutral face. One is presented above and one below a central fixation point. Subsequently, a probe appears behind one of the two faces and participants are asked to quickly indicate the position of the probe. Accuracy and reaction times on positive vs negative stimuli are compared between those receiving drug and placebo.
Time frame: Assessed during the research visit after the seventh day of atorvastatin or placebo administration, i.e. on the eight day after the patient started taking atorvastatin or placebo
Words describing positive and negative personality characteristics are presented, and participants are asked to quickly indicate whether they would like or dislike being described with the presented word. Accuracy and reaction times on positive vs negative stimuli are compared between those receiving drug and placebo.
Time frame: Assessed during the research visit after the seventh day of atorvastatin or placebo administration, i.e. on the eight day after the patient started taking atorvastatin or placebo
After a delay from the Emotional categorisation task, participants are asked to recall and write down as many words as possible from it. Accuracy in recall of positive vs negative stimuli are compared between those receiving drug and placebo.
Time frame: Assessed during the research visit after the seventh day of atorvastatin or placebo administration, i.e. on the eight day after the patient started taking atorvastatin or placebo
The original personality descriptors in the Emotional categorisation task, plus an equal number of matched distractor words, are presented, and participants are asked to indicate whether they recognise it from the Emotional categorisation task. Accuracy and reaction times on positive vs negative stimuli are compared between those receiving drug and placebo.
Time frame: Assessed during the research visit after the seventh day of atorvastatin or placebo administration, i.e. on the eight day after the patient started taking atorvastatin or placebo
During a computer-based task, participants are instructed to learn and select which images are associated with wins rather than losses. Accuracy and reaction times are assessed and compared between those receiving drug and placebo.
Time frame: A blood sample will be drawn on the day of randomisation and on the day of the research visit (i.e. after the seventh day on atorvastatin or placebo)
Changes in high sensitivity-C Reactive Protein (hs-CRP) from baseline to seven-day, comparing those receiving drug and placebo
University of Oxford
Other
The Effect of Seven-Day Atorvastatin Administration on Emotional Processing, Reward Processing, and Inflammation in Healthy Volunteers
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07008586
Behavior, Healthy
Cambridge, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT06944210
Healthy, Inflammation
Davis, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06041087
Behavior, Bone
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT05746845
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Orléans, France
View Trial Details