Selcuk University, Faculty of Dentistry
Konya, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT06393270
Materials to be used as permanent filling materials in Class II restorations are still an essential field of study. This study aims to evaluate the 5-year clinical performance of Class II restorations performed with different bulk-fill restorative materials.
The study was planned as an observational clinical trial. In the study, Class II restorations performed with Tetric Bulk Fill (TBF) and Filtek Bulk Fill (FBF) composites and Equia Forte Fil (EF) will be evaluated. Fifty-one patients and 119 restorations will be included in the study. Restorations will be assessed in terms of modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria during the 5th year. Cochran Q, Pearson chi-square, and Fisher-Freeman-Halton tests will be used for statistical analysis.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–50 year
All sexes
Observational
Konya, Turkey (Türkiye)
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
<!-- -->
Exclusion criteria
Dental caries classification system
Time frame: 5th year.
At the control appointment, it was determined whether there was material loss in the restoration. The scale used includes the characters A, B, and C. A is the best clinical result.
Time frame: 5th year.
At the control appointment, it was determined whether the restoration's color harmony with the adjacent tooth tissue was maintained. The scale used includes the characters A, B, and C. A is the best clinical result.
Time frame: 5th year.
At the follow-up appointment, it was determined whether there was any deterioration in the marginal adaptation of the restoration. The scale used includes the characters A, B, and C. A is the best clinical result.
Time frame: 5th year.
At the control appointment, it was determined whether there was any color change at the edges of the restoration. The scale used includes the characters A, B, and C. A is the best clinical result.
Time frame: 5th year.
At the follow-up appointment, it was determined whether there was any decay under the restoration. The scale used includes the characters A and C. A is the best clinical result.
Time frame: 5th year.
At the control appointment, it was determined whether the restoration surface had a defect. The scale used includes the characters A, B, and C. A is the best clinical result.
Time frame: 5th year.
At the control appointment, it was determined whether the restoration maintained its anatomical form. The scale used includes the characters A, B, and C. A is the best clinical result.
Time frame: 5th year.
At the follow-up appointment, it was determined whether there was postoperative sensitivity after the restorative procedure. The scale used includes the characters A, B, and C. A is the best clinical result.
Selcuk University
Other
5-year Clinical Follow-up of Bulk-fill Restorative Materials in Class II Restorations
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07262086
Class II Dental Caries, Dental Caries
Ismailia, Ismalia, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06894186
Class II Dental Caries, Dental Caries
View Trial DetailsNCT07718412
Behavior, Dental Caries
Sivas, Merkez, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07720999
Dental Caries, Neurologic Manifestations
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
View Trial Details