Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07236294

3D Printed vs. Milled Occlusal Splints in Dentistry

This crossover study aims to evaluate the wear comfort, retention, and stability of 3D-printed and milled occlusal splints in healthy subjects.

The main question it aims to answer is:

Research questions

- How do healthy subjects experience the wear comfort, fitting, retention and stability of a printed and milled occlusal splint? and how do clinicians experience the fitting, retention and stability of the splints?

By systematically assessing self-reported outcomes, this research seeks to contribute valuable insights into the practical applications of both technologies. The findings may not only enhance our understanding of patient preferences but also guide future developments in the design and manufacturing of occlusal splints, ultimately improving patient care in dental practice.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year–45 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

About this study

The main study parameter is to assess the participant self-reported findings regarding the comfort, retention, stability and fit of the milled and printed splint and in addition to the hygiene and discoloration of the splint over time.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects being healthy (ASA <IV)
  • Subjects with healthy, complete dentitions (except for extractions of wisdom teeth, or tooth extractions for the purpose of orthodontic treatment in the past)
  • Subjects willing and able to participate in the study
  • Subjects willing to provide written informed consent for their participation in the study

Exclusion criteria

  • Subjects with dental issues other than the inclusion criteria
  • Subjects with a history of autoimmune disorder
  • Subjects with known allergies to acrylic materials
  • Subjects with severe allergies manifested by a history of anaphylaxis or those with severe, chronic allergies (e.g., asthma) and subjects with an active infection of any kind at the time of enrollment
  • Subjects who are pregnant or lactating
  • Subjects enrolled in another investigational clinical trial

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Comfort

    Time frame: "From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks"

    Self reported wear comfort by filling in a questionnaire. This scale measures the comfort of the occlusal splint, where "Very uncomfortable" represents the worst experience (lowest score) and "Very comfortable" represents the best experience (highest score). Minimum Value: Very uncomfortable, Maximum Value: Very comfortable. Higher Scores Mean: Better comfort (more comfort)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Stability

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks

    Two dentists will evaluate the splints outside of the mouth using a standardized assessment form (pre-tested) focussing on stability. The splints will then be placed in the mouth of the subject and reassessed based on the same parameter.

    Description: This is a custom-developed 5-point Likert-type scale designed to assess the experience of splint stability. Dentists rate how stable or mobile the occlusal splint feel.

    Scale Values:

    • = Very unstable / significant movement
    • = Unstable / some movement
    • = Neutral / no notable instability or discomfort
    • = Stable / little to no discomfort
    • = Very stable / no movement or discomfort at all Score Range: Minimum = 1, Maximum = 5 Higher scores indicate a better outcome (i.e. greater stability and comfort during wear).

    Participants also rate stability on the same way. They rate how stable or mobile the occlusal splint felt during use.

  2. Perceived Retention of Occlusal Splint on Model

    Time frame: From enrollment to end of treatment at six weeks

    This 5-point Likert-type scale measures the perceived retention (fit and tightness) of the splint when seated on the dental model, used to assess passive fit.

    Scale Values:

    • = Much too loose
    • = Loose, but acceptable
    • = Optimal
    • = Slightly tight, but acceptable
    • = Too tight Score Range: Minimum = 1, Maximum = 5 A score of 3 ("Optimal") indicates the ideal result, where the occlusal splint has a good fit and retention on the model.

    Scores 1-2 ("Too loose") and 4-5 ("Too tight") indicate deviations from optimal retention, which may be considered suboptimal and might require adjustment.

  3. Perceived Retention of Occlusal Splint During Wear

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at six weeks.

    A custom 5-point Likert-type scale measuring how well the occlusal splint stays in place during use, based on patient-reported experience. The scale evaluates whether the retention is too loose or too tight, or within acceptable/optimal limits.

    Scale Values:

    • = Much too loose
    • = Loose, but acceptable
    • = Optimal
    • = Slightly tight, but acceptable
    • = Very good Score Range: Minimum = 1, Maximum = 5 Directionality: Higher scores indicate a better outcome (i.e. better retention and patient satisfaction during wear).
  4. Perceived Fit of the Occlusal Splint on the Model and in the Mouth

    Time frame: From enrollment to end of the treatment at six weeks.

    This 5-point Likert-type scale evaluates the fit of the occlusal splint both on the dental model and in the patient's mouth. It assesses how well the splint is perceived to conform to the desired shape and fit, both passively on the model and during wear.

    Scale Values:

    • = Very poor
    • = Poor
    • = Average
    • = Good
    • = Very good Score Range: Minimum = 1, Maximum = 5

    Directionality:

    Higher scores represent better fit (i.e., optimal adaptation and minimal discomfort).

  5. Perceived Fit of the Occlusal Splint on Teeth

    Time frame: From enrollment to end of the treatment at six weeks

    This 5-point Likert-type scale measures how well the patient feels the occlusal splint fits on their teeth. This includes subjective experiences regarding comfort and fit quality.

    Scale Values:

    • = Very poor fit
    • = Poor fit
    • = Average fit
    • = Good fit
    • = Very good fit Score Range: Minimum = 1, Maximum = 5

    Directionality:

    Higher scores indicate a better fit (i.e., a more comfortable and effective splint).

  6. Cleanability

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks.

    This 5-point Likert-type scale measures how easy or difficult it is for the patient to keep the occlusal splint clean. It evaluates the patient's experience of cleaning the splint and the effort involved in maintaining its cleanliness.

    Scale Values:

    • = Very difficult to clean
    • = Difficult to clean
    • = Neutral
    • = Easy to clean
    • = Very easy to clean Score Range: Minimum = 1, Maximum = 5

    Directionality:

    Higher scores indicate that the splint is easier to clean, suggesting better material or design for cleanliness.

  7. Occlusion

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks.

    Articulating paper is used to check the occlusion. The contact marks of the paper help identify areas of contact between the splint and natural teeth, and the distribution of these contacts is assessed.

    • = Very Poor Occlusion. Few or no contacts, or contacts are isolated in a small area, which may create uneven pressure and discomfort.
    • = Poor Occlusion. A small number of scattered contacts, or large areas without contact. There are visible areas where the occlusion is uneven.
    • = Neutral Occlusion. Contacts are generally evenly distributed but may be slightly uneven in certain areas. Some contact marks, but no clear high spots or excessive force.
    • = Good Occlusion Most contacts are evenly distributed. A few areas may show slightly heavier marks but are within an acceptable range comfort and function.
    • = Very Good Even pressure across the splint, indicating optimal fit. Higher scores (4-5) indicate better occlusion.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Sabine Mechelse, MSc

CONTACT

[email protected]

0031648136263

Stanimira Kalaykova- Sparreboom, dr.

CONTACT

[email protected]

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Radboud University Medical Center

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Material and Clinical Assessment of 3D-printed vs. Milled Occlusal Splints: A Study on Performance and Durability in Dental Applications

Acronym: Splints

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Nov 19, 2025
Registry last updated
Nov 19, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.