Mid Atlantic Retina- Wills Eye Institute
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States
NCT Number: NCT02836210
To prospectively compare clinical outcomes using straight (perpendicular) versus angled trocar insertion during 27 gauge pars plana vitrectomy surgery for epiretinal membrane
Primary Endpoints:
Sclerotomy suture rates and incidence of suture blebs at the end of 27 gauge MIVS.
Secondary Endpoints:
Rate of postoperative wound-related complications such as hypotony, choroidal detachments, endophthalmitis, and sclerotomy-related retinal tears with a minimum follow-up of 30 days.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States
Microincision vitrectomy surgery (MIVS) has largely replaced use of conventional, 20-gauge vitrectomy, offering more rapid visual recovery, decreased postoperative pain and inflammation, and reduced surgical time with use of smaller diameter instruments1. Most recently, 27 gauge vitrectomy instrumentation has been introduced2, offering an additional small gauge option to the currently available 23, 25, or 25+ gauge systems.
Initial experience with small gauge MIVS yielded mixed results, with early reports noting increased rates of wound-related postoperative complications including hypotony, choroidal detachments, endophthalmitis, and sclerotomy-related retinal tears3,4. However, with more experience and instrument modifications, outcomes with MIVS improved1,3. In a 2010 Ophthalmic Technology Assessment report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology, outcomes of MIVS were found comparable to that of 20 gauge vitrectomy benchmarks5.
Prior studies have established that a two-stage, angled incision results in improved wound integrity with 23, 25, and 25+ MIVS systems6,7, helping to prevent complications such as post-operative endophthalmitis and hypotony. However, in the two clinical series describing outcomes of 27 gauge MIVS, a one-stage, perpendicular wound construction was performed without complication in a series of 31 patients2,8. Thus far, direct comparison between wound construction techniques (one-stage, perpendicular or two-stage, angled) has not been evaluated.
The purpose of this study is to prospectively compare clinical outcomes using straight, one-stage (perpendicular) versus angled, two-stage trocar insertion during 27 gauge minimally invasive vitrectomy surgery (MIVS). The design of the study will be a randomized, clinical trial. Primary outcomes will be sclerotomy suture rates and incidence of suture blebs at the end of 27 gauge MIVS surgery for epiretinal membrane and macular pucker indications (no air or gas tamponade). Secondary endpoints will include rate of postoperative wound-related complications such as hypotony, choroidal detachments, endophthalmitis, and sclerotomy-related retinal tears with a minimum of 30 days follow-up.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Conventional, 3-port pars plana vitrectomy with membrane peeling is performed for epiretinal membrane indication. Angled and straight trocar entry will be directly compared.
Time frame: Minimum follow-up 30 days.
Time frame: Minimum follow-up of 30 days
Rate of complications including hypotony, choroidal detachment, and endophthalmitis
Time frame: Minimum follow-up of 30 days
Measured in mm Hg by tonometry
Wills Eye
Other
27-gauge Vitrectomy Wound Integrity: a Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Angled Versus Straight Entry in Fluid-filled Vitrectomized Eyes
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07736690
Epiretinal Membrane, Eye Diseases
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04132401
Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Cardiovascular Diseases
Manresa, Barcelona, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT06459284
Epiretinal Membrane, Eye Diseases
Vienna, Austria
View Trial DetailsNCT06753539
Epiretinal Membrane, Eye Diseases
Vienna, Austria
View Trial Details