Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04001257

18F-Fluoro-Ethyl-Tyrosine (FET) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Grading Glioma

Role of 18F-FET PET for grading gliomas according to 2016 WHO classification: value of quantitative and qualitative data obtained by 18F-FET PET for differentiating low grade glioma (WHO II) versus high grade gliomas (WHO III and IV)

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

CHRU de Brest

Brest, 29609, France

About this study

The management and prognosis of patients with glioma is highly dependent on the tumour grade according to the new 2016 classification of the World Health Organization (WHO), which incorporates molecular characteristics. Standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enhanced by contrast is the basis of imaging primary brain tumours including gliomas. Nevertheless MRI specificity to type glioma is limited. Recently, positron emission tomography (PET) molecular imaging using radiolabeled amino acids or their analogues has been recommended by the Neuro-Oncology Response Assessment (RANO) working group for differential diagnosis of brain lesions, non-invasive classification of glial tumours, prognostic value, tumour delineation, stereotactic biopsy radiotherapy planification and treatments follow-up, to provide additional informations beyond MRI on biological processes such as cell proliferation, membrane biosynthesis, glucose consumption and absorption of amino acid analogues. Among the radiotracers used in PET, radiolabeled amino acids or their analogues are increasingly used in clinical routine for glioma imaging. Although most previous PET studies focused on brain gliomas used L-[methyl- 11 C] -methionine (11C-MET), the fluorinated amino acid analogue O - (2-[ 18 F] fluoroethyl) -L-tyrosine (18F-FET) appeared to be a favorable marker for clinical routine due to his longer half-life than Carbone 11. Recent european guidelines attempt to provide some guidance on the performance and interpretation of molecular imaging. The authors recommend a static (20-40 mn after injection (Pi)) or dynamic PET acquisition (40-50 mn from injection). A visual analysis can be completed by a quantitative analysis which consists to measure mean and maximal tumour activity uptake values (SUVmean and SUVmax) and their respective tumour to background ratios (TBRmean and TBRmax). Although the mean physiological brain activity uptake is well defined, the measurement of mean glioma activity uptake is less clear. Indeed, TBRmean depends on the delineation of the tumour ROI and/or VOI. Most often previously, VOI was determined by a 3D contouring process using a tumour-to-brain ratio of at least 1.6 at the beginning of the scan, threshold defined on a brain gliomas biopsy-controlled study. Moreover, Albert et al. emphasized the interest of early TBRmax.To our knowledge, none study evaluated others parameters as SUVmax, SUVmean and TBRmean in early period. In this context, the aim of this study was to compare quantitative and qualitative PET parameters between Low Grade Glioma and High Grade Glioma.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • glial tumor
  • patient underwent 18F-FET PET at Brest University Hospital
  • no opposite to participate

Exclusion criteria

  • patient Under 18 years old
  • opposite to participate

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. quantitative criteria (SUVmax) between 2 groups (glioma II vs glioma III-IV)

    Time frame: 3 months

    study mean value of SUVmax obtained by 18F-FET PET between 2 groups (glioma II vs glioma III-IV)

  2. quantitative criteria (TBRmax) between 2 groups (glioma II vs glioma III-IV)

    Time frame: 3 months

    study mean value of TBRmax obtained by 18F-FET PET between 2 groups (glioma II vs glioma III-IV)

  3. quantitative criteria (SUVmean) between 2 groups (glioma II vs glioma III-IV)

    Time frame: 3 months

    study mean value of SUVmean obtained by 18F-FET PET between 2 groups (glioma II vs glioma III-IV)

  4. quantitative criteria (TBRmean) between 2 groups (glioma II vs glioma III-IV)

    Time frame: 3 months

    study mean value of TBRmean obtained by 18F-FET PET between 2 groups (glioma II vs glioma III-IV)

  5. quantitative criteria (SUVpeak) between 2 groups (glioma II vs glioma III-IV)

    Time frame: 3 months

    study mean value of SUVpeak obtained by 18F-FET PET between 2 groups (glioma II vs glioma III-IV)

  6. quantitative criteria (métabolic tumoral volume MTV) between 2 groups (glioma II vs glioma III-IV)

    Time frame: 3 months

    study mean value of MTV obtained by 18F-FET PET between 2 groups (glioma II vs glioma III-IV)

  7. quantitative criteria (Total Lesion Glycolysis TLG) between 2 groups (glioma II vs glioma III-IV)

    Time frame: 3 months

    study mean value of TLG obtained by 18F-FET PET between 2 groups (glioma II vs glioma III-IV)

  8. quantitative criteria (SUVmin) between 2 groups (glioma II vs glioma III-IV)

    Time frame: 3 months

    study mean value of SUVmin obtained by 18F-FET PET between 2 groups (glioma II vs glioma III-IV)

Secondary outcomes

  1. qualitative criteria (Time Activity Curve TAC) between 2 groups (glioma II vs glioma III-IV)

    Time frame: 3 months

    study qualitative data obtained by 18F-FET PET between 2 groups (glioma II vs glioma III-IV)

  2. agreement between readers for quantitative and qualitative criteria

    Time frame: 3 months

    study inter and intra observers agreement

  3. diagnostic accuracy of clinical data to discriminate the 2 groups of glioma (symptom or size of tumor)

    Time frame: 3 months

    study diagnostic accuracy of clinical data

  4. diagnostic accuracy of biological criteria (as MGMT mutation or IDH status or 1p19q codeletion, ATRX status) to discriminate the 2 groups of glioma

    Time frame: 3 months

    study diagnostic accuracy of biological data

  5. diagnostic accuracy of PET criteria (SUVmax, TBRmax, SUVmean, TBRmean, SUVpeak, SUVmin, TLG and MTV) between the 2 groups of glioma

    Time frame: 3 months

    study diagnostic accuracy of PET data

  6. prognostic value of F-FET PET data on PET Baseline on PFS

    Time frame: 2 years and 3 months

    study the prognostic value of PET criteria on PFS

  7. prognostic value of F-FET PET data on PET Baseline on OS

    Time frame: 2 years and 3 months

    study the prognostic value of PET criteria on OS

  8. prognostic value of variation of quantitative PET data (SUVmax, TBRmax, SUVmean, TBRmean, SUVpeak, SUVmin, MTV, TLG) (for example deltaSUVmax between PET Baseline and PET 3 months) on PFS

    Time frame: 2 years and 3 months

    modification of PET criteria between PET Baseline and PET at follow-up and their prognostic value on PFS

  9. prognostic value of variation of quantitative PET data (SUVmax, TBRmax, SUVmean, TBRmean, SUVpeak, SUVmin, MTV, TLG) (for example deltaSUVmax between PET Baseline and PET 3 months) on OS

    Time frame: 2 years and 3 months

    modification of PET criteria between PET Baseline and PET at follow-up and their prognostic value on OS

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Brest

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Role of 18F-Fluoro-Ethyl-Tyrosine (FET) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) for Grading Glioma

Acronym: GLIOFET

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Jun 28, 2019
Registry last updated
Jan 18, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.