Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01358175

16 Week Efficacy and 2 Year Long Term Safety and Efficacy of Secukinumab in Patients With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis

This study will assess the efficacy and safety of secukinumab in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis who are intolerant to or have had an inadequate response to NSAIDs, DMARDs and / or TNFα inhibitor therapy.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Novartis Investigative Site, Brussels, Belgium

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or non-pregnant, non-lactating female patients at least 18 years of age
  • Diagnosis of moderate to severe AS with prior documented radiologic evidence (X-ray) fulfilling the Modified New York criteria for AS (1984)
  • Patients should have been on NSAIDs with an inadequate response
  • Patients who are regularly taking NSAIDs as part of their AS therapy are required to be on a stable dose
  • Patients who have been on an anti-TNFα agent (not more than one) must have experienced an inadequate response

Exclusion criteria

  • Chest X-ray with evidence of ongoing infectious or malignant process
  • Patients with total ankylosis of the spine
  • Patients previously treated with any biological immunomodulating agents except for those targeting TNFα
  • Previous treatment with any cell-depleting therapies
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

Treatment and study plan

Secukinumab (75 mg)

Drug

Secukinumab (75 mg)

Secukinumab (150 mg)

Drug

Secukinumab (150 mg)

Placebo

Drug

Placebo

Primary outcomes

  1. Assessment of Responders for the SpondyloArthritis International Society / ASAS 20 Response

    Time frame: 16 weeks

    ASAS 20 response is a validated composite assessment, reflecting the proportion of treated patients who achieve within a defined timeframe at least 20% improvement in score in at least 3 of a conventional set of 4 clinical domains relevent to AS and no worsening in the fourth domain. ASAS 20 is used to assess the efficacy of at least one dose of secukinumab against placebo.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assessment of Responders for the SpondyloArthritis International Society ASAS 40 Response

    Time frame: 16 weeks

    ASAS 40 response is a validated composite assessment, reflecting the proportion of treated patients who achieve within a defined timeframe at least 40% improvement in score in at least 3 of a conventional set of 4 clinical domains relevent to AS and no worsening in the fourth domain. ASAS 40 is used to assess the efficacy of at least one dose of secukinumab against placebo.

  2. Change From Baseline in Serum hsCRP

    Time frame: Base line and Week 16

    The change from baseline in hsCRP is expressed as a ratio of post-baseline to baseline values. With the ratio normalized to 1.0 at baseline, ratios less than 1.0 represent decreased postbaseline values, whereas ratios greater than 1.0 represent increased post-baseline values.

  3. Assessment of Responders for the SpondyloArthritis International Society ASAS 5/6 Response

    Time frame: 16 weeks

    ASAS 5/6 response is a validated composite assessment, reflecting the proportion of treated patients who achieve within a defined timeframe at least 20% improvement in score in at least 5 of a conventional set of 6 clinical domains relevent to AS and no worsening in the remaining domain. In this study, ASAS 5/6 is used to assess the efficacy of at least one dose of secukinumab against placebo.

  4. Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index / BASDAI

    Time frame: Baseline and 16 weeks

    BASDAI is a validated assessment tool using 0 through 10 scales (0 indicating "no problem" and 10 indicating " worst problem"), to characterize six clinical domains pertaining to five major symptoms of AS perceived by the patients. Computed composite scores of 4 or greater indicate suboptimal disease control. In this study, the BASDAI is used to assess the efficacy of at least one dose of secukinumab verus placebo. To give each symptom equal weighting, the mean (average) of the two scores relating to morning stiffness is taken. The resulting 0 to 50 score is divided by 5 to give a final 0 - 10 BASDAI score. Scores of 4 or greater suggest suboptimal control of disease, and patients with scores of 4 or greater are usually good candidates for either a change in their medical therapy or for enrollment in clinical trials evaluating new drug therapies directed at Ankylosing Spondylitis.

  5. Change From Baseline in Physical Function Component of the Short-form Health Survey / SF-36 PCS

    Time frame: baseline, 16 weeks

    SF-36 is a 36 item questionnaire which measures Quality of Life across eight domains, which are both phyically and emotionally based. Two overall summary scores, the Phyical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) can be computed. In this study, SF-36 PCS is used to assess improvement from baseline of at least one dose of secukinumab versus placebo.The SF-36 is a validated instrument measuring health-related quality of life across multiple disease states. It has 36 questions with 8 subscale scores and 2 summary scores (1) physical component summary=physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. For subscores and summary scores, 0 =worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. Change from Baseline= post-Baseline - Baseline value.

  6. Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Questionnaire / ASQoL

    Time frame: baseline and 16 weeks

    ASQoL is an 18 item questionnaire that assesses disease-specific quality of life (QoL), consisting of statements that are relevant to the physical and mental conditions for a participant with AS: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each statement is answered by the participant as a 'Yes' (scored as 1) or 'No' (scored as 0). All item scores are summed to give a total score. Total score can range from 0 (good QoL) to 18 (poor QoL). In this study, ASQoL is used to assess improvement from baseline of at least one dose of secukinumab versus placebo.

  7. Assessment of Responders for ASAS Partial Remission

    Time frame: 16 weeks

    ASAS partial remission is a composite assessment, reflecting the proportion of treated patients who achieve within a defined time frame a value not above 2 units in each of the 4 ASAS domains on a scale of 10. In this study ASAS partial remission is used to assess the efficacy of at least one dose of secukinumab versus placebo.ASAS partial remission was defined as a VAS score of less than 2 units in each of the 4 domains of ASAS 20: participant global assessment, pain (total back pain), function and inflammation. The percentages of participants who achieved ASAS partial remission were calculated.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study of Secukinumab to Demonstrate the 16 Week Efficacy and to Assess the Long Term Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy up to 2 Years in Patients With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis

Acronym: MEASURE 1

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
May 23, 2011
Registry last updated
Mar 9, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.