Kenya Medical Research Institute
Nairobi, Kenya
NCT Number: NCT04998318
The Pocket colposcope has 510k FDA clearance and has been successfully used in almost 1500 unique patients globally in Duke and non-Duke protocols to date. 400 women who are HPV-positive and planned to undergo treatment at 6 Ministry of Health-supported outpatient clinics in Kisumu County will be recruited to the study. After providing informed consent, participants will be randomized 1:1 to either standard-of-care visual inspection or colposcopy with the Pocket Colposcope
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me25 year–65 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Nairobi, Kenya
Women randomized to the standard-of-care arm will undergo VIA followed by Visual Inspection with Lugol's Iodine (VILI). Women randomized to the Pocket Colposcope arm will undergo Pocket-Assisted VIA (PA-VIA), green light imaging, and VILI using the Pocket Colposcope. Women in both arms will have biopsies taken of any suspicious lesions, or two biopsies taken in random locations if no lesions are visible. The locations of the biopsies will be based on provider impression. After their study-exams and biopsies are taken, women who are eligible for ablative treatment will be immediately treated in the clinic. Those with larger lesions or lesions concerning for invasive cancer will be referred to the local hospital for an excisional procedure.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Both arms will receive treatment in order to prevent cervical cancer. However, the intervention using the pocket colposcope device will be used on half the enrolled subjects.
VIA and VILI as previously described,
Time frame: Baseline
The primary endpoint was the diagnostic accuracy of VIA versus the Pocket Colposcope for detecting CIN2+ lesions.
Time frame: Baseline
Sensitivity of Pocket vs VIA
Time frame: Baseline
Specificity of Pocket vs VIA
Time frame: Baseline
Negative predictive value (NPV) of Pocket vs VIA
Time frame: Baseline
Positive predictive value (PPV) of Pocket vs VIA
Time frame: baseline
Participants were asked how much they knew about cervical cancer and cervical cancer prevention prior to the exam and after the visit.
Time frame: baseline
Providers perspective was assessed using the question: 'Did you run into any of the following challenges during today's exam?'.
Time frame: Baseline
Participant perspective of the exam was assessed by asking "Did you experience any pain throughout your exam?"
Time frame: Baseline
Participant perspective of the exam was assessed by asking "How confident are you in the provider's assessment from today's visit?"
Time frame: Baseline
Participant perspective of the exam was assessed by asking "How likely would you recommend this medical exam to a friend?"
Duke University
Other
Compare the Performance of the Pocket Colposcope to VIA/VILI for Triage of HPV+ Women in Kenya
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04092257
Blood-Borne Infections, Cervical Cancer
Lilongwe, Malawi
View Trial DetailsNCT05340322
Blood-Borne Infections, Cervical Cancer
Lima, Peru
View Trial DetailsNCT04155294
Blood-Borne Infections, Cervical Cancer
Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT07225530
Blood-Borne Infections, Cervical Cancer
La Romana, Dominican Republic
View Trial Details