NCT Number: NCT00153023
1 Year Trial Telmisartan 80 mg Versus Valsartan 160 mg in Hypertensive Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Overt Nephropathy
The general aim of this study is to compare telmisartan 80 mg with valsartan 160 mg in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy with adjusted blood pressure beyond the target of 130/80 mmHg after one year of treatment.
The primary objective of this study is to show that telmisartan 80 mg is at least as effective (i.e., not inferior) and possibly superior to valsartan 160 mg in reducing 24 hour proteinuria after one year of treatment.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
30 year–80 year
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary location
University Hospital St. Anna, Brno, Czechia
About this study
This is a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, forced titration, multicentre, parallel group trial in patients with essential hypertension, diabetes mellitus type 2 and diabetic nephropathy.
After a 4-6 week Run-in period, patients are randomised to one of the treatment groups and receive either Telmisartan 40 - 80 mg or Valsartan 80 - 160 mg. The treatment regimen is a forced titration with the lower dose given for 2 weeks and the higher dose given for the rest of the treatment period summing up to 52 weeks of treatment. During the treatment period, 8 visits to the investigator are scheduled in order to control blood pressure, renal function parameters and safety. In addition, parameters of endothelial function and oxidative stress are measured at baseline, 6 months and after one year of treatment.
Study Hypothesis:
Non-inferiority of telmisartan 80 mg compared to valsartan 160 mg will be tested using the following set of hypotheses:
Null Hypothesis:
The overall mean change from baseline in UPER (24 hour urinary protein excretion rate) for telmisartan 80 mg is inferior to that for valsartan 160 mg by 0.5 g/day or more.
Alternative Hypothesis:
The overall mean change from baseline in UPER (24 hour urinary protein excretion rate) for telmisartan 80 mg is less than 0.5 g/day worse than that for valsartan 160 mg.
Comparison(s):
In order to test the non-inferiority hypothesis, analysis of covariance with treatment and centre as main effects and baseline as a covariate will be performed. Time-to-event data will be analysed using the log-rank test.
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus
- Aged 30-70 years of age
- Hypertension at screening defined as:
- an average cuff systolic blood pressure > 130 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure >80 mmHg in untreated patients OR
- patients receiving antihypertensive therapy (i.e., medications specifically prescribed to treat hypertension)
- Overt nephropathy defined by 24 hour proteinuria >= 900 mg and by serum creatinine below 265 mol/l (3.0 mg/dl)
Exclusion criteria
None
Treatment and study plan
valsartan
DrugPrimary outcomes
-
Change from baseline (Visit 6) in 24 hour proteinuria, after one year of treatment (study end) with telmisartan 80 mg versus valsartan 160 mg.
Time frame: Baseline, after 1 year of treatment
Secondary outcomes
-
Change from baseline in 24-hour urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER).
Time frame: Baseline, after 1 year of treatment
-
Change from baseline in 24-hour urinary sodium excretion rate.
Time frame: Baseline, after 1 year of treatment
-
Change from baseline in serum creatinine.
Time frame: Baseline, after 1 year of treatment
-
Change from baseline in creatinine clearance
Time frame: Baseline, after 1 year of treatment
-
Change from baseline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).
Time frame: Baseline, after 1 year of treatment
-
Change from baseline in plasma asymmetrical dimethylarginine (ADMA) levels.
Time frame: Baseline, after 1 year of treatment
-
Change from baseline in urine 8-iso-prostaglandin F2α levels
Time frame: Baseline, after 1 year of treatment
-
Change from baseline in serum high sensitive C-reactive protein (CRP) levels.
Time frame: Baseline, after 1 year of treatment
-
Time to a composite of a doubling of serum creatinine concentration , end-stage renal disease (ESRD), or all cause death
Time frame: after 1 year of treatment
-
Time to a composite of morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular causes (myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, first hospitalisation for heart failure or unstable angina, coronary or peripheral revascularisation).
Time frame: after 1 year of treatment
-
Change from baseline in insulin sensitivity (Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) index).
Time frame: Baseline, after 1 year of treatment
-
Change from baseline in plasma adiponectin levels.
Time frame: Baseline, after 1 year of treatment
-
Change from baseline in BP endpoints (SBP, DBP and pulse pressure)
Time frame: Baseline, after 1 year of treatment
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Boehringer Ingelheim
Industry
Registry information
Official study title
A Prospective, Randomised, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Forced-titration, Multicentre, Parallel Group, One Year Treatment Trial to Investigate the Efficacy of Telmisartan 80 mg Versus Valsartan 160 mg in Hypertensive Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Overt Nephropathy VIVALDI-Study
Important dates
- Study start
- 2003
- Primary completion
- 2005
- Study completion
- 2005
- First posted
- Sep 12, 2005
- Registry last updated
- Nov 13, 2013
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
A Prospective, Randomised, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Forced-titration, Multicentre, Parallel Group, One Year Treatment Trial to Compare Telmisartan (MICARDIS) 80 mg Versus Losartan (COZAAR) 100 mg, in Hypertensive Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Overt Nephropathy (AMADEO Study)
NCT00168857
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Complications
Montgomery, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsMeasurement of Endothelial Function and Cardiac Output: New Methods
NCT02299960
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Complications
Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany
View Trial DetailsEffects of Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) On Anti-HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigen)Antibody Levels In Patients Awaiting Cadaveric Renal Transplant.
NCT00446459
Autoimmune Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsEffects of Rituximab and Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) on Highly Sensitized Patients Awaiting Renal Transplant
NCT00446251
Autoimmune Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
View Trial Details